Skip to main content

Breast Tissue Classification Using Local Binary Pattern Variants: A Comparative Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 894))

Abstract

Mammographic tissue density is considered to be one of the major risk factors for developing breast cancer. In this paper we use quantitative measurements of Local Binary Patterns and its variants for breast tissue classification. We compare the classification results of LBP, ELBP, Uniform ELBP and M-ELBP for classifying mammograms as fatty, glandular and dense. A Bayesian-Network classifier is used with stratified ten-fold cross-validation. The experimental results indicate that ELBP patterns at different orientations extract more relevant elliptical breast tissue information from the mammograms indicating the importance of directional filters for breast tissue classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Oliver, A., et al.: A novel breast tissue density classification methodology. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 12, 55–65 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McCormack, V.A., dos Santos Silva, I.: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 15(6), 1159–1169 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. George, M., Rampun, A., Denton, E., Zwiggelaar, R.: Mammographic ellipse modelling towards birads density classification. In: Tingberg, A., Lång, K., Timberg, P. (eds.) IWDM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9699, pp. 423–430. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Obenauer, S., Sohns, C., Werner, C., Grabbe, E.: Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography. J. Digit. Imaging 19(3), 258 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfe, J.N.: Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37(5), 2486–2492 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kallenberg, M.G., Lokate, M., Van Gils, C.H., Karssemeijer, N.: Automatic breast density segmentation: an integration of different approaches. Phys. Med. Biol. 56(9), 2715 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Muhimmah, I., Zwiggelaar, R.: Mammographic density classification using multiresolution histogram information. In: Proceedings of the International Special Topic Conference on Information Technology in Biomedicine, ITAB, October 2006

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zwiggelaar, R., Muhimmah, I., Denton, E.R.E.: Mammographic density classification based on statistical grey-level histogram modeling. In: Proceedings of the Medical Image Understanding and Analysis (MIUA 2005), pp. 183–186 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hadjidemetriou, E., Grossberg, M.D., Nayar, S.K.: Multiresolution histograms and their use for recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26(7), 831–847 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou, C., et al.: Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms. Med. Phys. 28(6), 1056–1069 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. He, W., Denton, E.R.E., Zwiggelaar, R.: Mammographic segmentation and risk classification using a novel binary model based Bayes classifier. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds.) IWDM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7361, pp. 40–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Zwiggelaar, R.: Automatic classification of breast density. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 2005. ICIP 2005, vol. 2, pp. II-1258. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mutra, M., Grgi, M., Dela, K.: Breast density classification using multiple feature selection. automatika 53(4), 362–372 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Petroudi, S., Brady, M.: Breast density segmentation using texture. In: Astley, S.M., Brady, M., Rose, C., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds.) IWDM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4046, pp. 609–615. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11783237_82

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Oliver, A., Llad, X., Marti, R., Freixenet, J., Zwiggelaar, R.: Classifying mammograms using texture information. In: Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, Vol. 223 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nanni, L., Lumini, A., Brahnam, S.: Local binary patterns variants as texture descriptors for medical image analysis. Artif. Intell. Med. 49(2), 117–125 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen, H.-T., Caplier, A.: Elliptical local binary patterns for face recognition. In: Park, J.-I., Kim, J. (eds.) ACCV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7728, pp. 85–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37410-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Ojala, T., Pietikäinen, M., Mäenpää, T.: Gray scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. In: Vernon, D. (ed.) ECCV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1842, pp. 404–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45054-8_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Suckling, J., et al.: The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In: International Congress Series Exerpta Medica, vol. 1069, pp. 375–378 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ferlay, J., et al.: Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer 136(5), E359–E386 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. American College of Radiology, Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BIRADS. American College of Radiology, PA, Philadelphia (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. George, M., Denton, E., Zwiggelaar, R.: Mammogram breast density classification using mean-elliptical local binary patterns. In: International Workshop on Breast Imaging (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minu George .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

George, M., Zwiggelaar, R. (2018). Breast Tissue Classification Using Local Binary Pattern Variants: A Comparative Study. In: Nixon, M., Mahmoodi, S., Zwiggelaar, R. (eds) Medical Image Understanding and Analysis. MIUA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 894. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95921-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95921-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95920-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95921-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics