Predicting Subgrade Resilient Modulus for Use in the MEPDG Using Common Soil Indices

Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)


In roadway pavement design, one must consider the performance of the pavement structure and mixture design. The tendency for pavement to be more flexible in nature gives increased importance to the properties and condition of the underlying soil subgrade. Traditional foundation design normally considers the static strength response of the soil from stationary loads. Roadway pavement design, however, must consider the dynamic strength response created by moving traffic loads. This dynamic strength of soil, or “stiffness,” is known as its resilient modulus (MR). The resilient modulus is determined by costly and time-consuming laboratory tests. For these reasons, it would be greatly beneficial to find an effective, yet simpler method to determine the values of MR. The goal of this study was to utilize multiple regression analyses to determine the relationships between common soil index properties, MR, and use these relationships to create an equation to model. The methodology used in the creation of these equations will be described as well as a statistical evaluation of their performance. Subgrade soil property data for 253 different soils found in northeast Texas was mined from Arizona State University’s “National Catalog of Natural Subgrade Properties Needed for the ME-PDG Input.” The common soil index properties studied include five sieve analysis gradations, liquid limit, and plasticity index. These properties were analyzed against MR.


Resilient Modulus Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) Soil Index Properties Northeast Texas Subgrade Soil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The contents presented in this paper reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of any agency or institute.


  1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO): Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Coleri, E.: Relationship between resilient modulus and soil index properties of unbound materials. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey (2007)Google Scholar
  3. Davies, B.O.A.: A model for the prediction of subgrade soil resilient modulus for flexible-pavement design: influence of moisture content and climate change. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH (2004)Google Scholar
  4. George, K.P.: Prediction of resilient modulus from soil index properties. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS (2004) Google Scholar
  5. Huang, Y.H.: Pavement Analysis and Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1993)Google Scholar
  6. Ravindra, G.: Development of resilient modulus prediction models for base and subgrade pavement layers from in-situ devices test results. Master’s Thesis, Louisiana State University (2004)Google Scholar
  7. Nguyen, B.T., Mohajerani, A.: Resilient modulus of fine-grained soil and a simple testing and calculation method for determining an average resilient modulus value for pavement design. Transp. Geotech. 7, 59–70 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zapata, C.E.: Research Results Digest 347: A National Database of Subgrade Soil-Water Characteristic Curves and Selected Soil Properties for Use with the MEPDG. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. ISBN: 978-0-309-43012-8 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Texas at TylerTylerUSA
  2. 2.The Texas A&M University SystemCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations