Skip to main content

Roadmap to Local Autonomy? Drivers of Variation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe

Abstract

The previous chapters of the book have identified substantial and persistent patterns of variation in terms of local autonomy and its components across the 39 countries covered by the present study. This chapter seeks to explain the variation of local autonomy by trying to identify drivers of variation. Six hypotheses are explored in this regard with the database available. The hypotheses state that local autonomy varies in response to voter preferences, requirements of modernisation, state traditions, path dependency, games of multilevel governance, or citizen trust. State traditions, multilevel governance and citizen trust are the factors that best account for the cross-country variation in local autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The impact of population size on government structures as regards regionalisation has been investigated by Hooghe and Marks from a somewhat different angle (Hooghe and Marks 2012). They argue that (larger) population size increases communication needs concerning policy development; hence, larger countries tend to be more decentralised than smaller ones in order to facilitate “soft” communication.

  2. 2.

    This finding is in contrast to that of Hooghe and Marks (2012), who found supporting evidence for a positive relationship between population size and decentralisation measured as regionalisation by the Regional Authority Index. The divergent findings may suggest that decentralisation to different levels of government may be driven by different sets of factors.

References

  • Baldersheim, H., & Rose, L. E. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Territorial Choice in Europe – Conclusions. In H. Baldersheim & L. E. Rose (Eds.), Territorial Choice. The Politics of Boundaries and Borders. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baldersheim, H., Haug, A. V., & Øgård, M. (2011). The Rise of the Networking Region. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bish, R. L., & Ostrom, V. (1973). Understanding Urban Government; Metropolitan Reform Reconsidered. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Monitoring Committee. (2016). Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of the European Charter of Local Self-Government in 47 Member States. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denters, B., Goldsmith, M., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P., & Rose, L. E. (2014). Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, K. N. (1980). The State Traditions in Western Europe. A Study of an Idea and Institutions. Oxford: Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer 79. (2013). Public Opinion in the European Union. The European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay. From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberg, K. (2016). Evolutionary Institutionalism: New Perspectives. Politics and the Life Sciences, 35, 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2012). Beyond Federalism: Estimating and Explaining the Territorial Structure of Government. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 42, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Niedzwiecki, S., Chapman Osterkatz, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance (Vol. I). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Illner, M. (2010). Top-Down or Bottom-Up? Coping with Territorial Fragmentation in the Czech Republic. In H. Baldersheim & L. E. Rose (Eds.), Territorial Choice. The Politics of Boundaries and Borders. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M., & Loughlin, J. (Eds.). (1997). The Political Economy of Regionalism. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, J., & Peters, G. B. (1997). State Traditions, Administrative Reforms and Regionalization. In M. Keating & J. Loughlin (Eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin, J., Hendriks, F., & Lidström, A. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustick, I. S. (2011). Taking Evolution Seriously: Historical Institutionalism and Evolutionary Theory. Polity, 43, 179–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouritzen, P. E. (1991). Den politiske syklus. Aarhus: Forlaget Politika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, S. (2010). The Evolution of Modern States: Sweden, Japan, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swianiewicz, P. (Ed.). (2010). Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swianiewicz, P. (2014). An Empirical Typology of Local Government Systems in Eastern Europe. Local Government Studies, 40(2), 292–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Government Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ladner, A. et al. (2019). Roadmap to Local Autonomy? Drivers of Variation. In: Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95642-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics