Skip to main content

Engineering Economics

Abstract

The Galilean economists of the nineteenth century revealed novel traits compared with eighteenth-century scholars. Though they graduated mainly in law, the academics discussed here made explicit reference to Galileo as the ideal scientist, while retaining an empirical view of political economy. The keywords of this episode—statistics, mathematics, complexity, experimentalism, observation, but also pragmatism, factories, and labor—chart a trajectory that raises some questions about a research field aspiring to use strict tools in researching empirical laws. As the protagonists of this episode, economists mainly evoked the experimental dimension of the Galilean trinity, but the appropriate use of mathematics represented their true frontier. Experimentation and observation were considered as parts of the statistical practice. In the era of deep-rooted positivism, did they succeed in conducting a rigorous (i.e. scientific) analysis of social and economic reality that could be condensed into statistical data?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This current of thought owes its name to two regions—Lombardy and Veneto—where it was mainly rooted. In particular, its exponents taught at Pavia and Padua Universities.

References

  • Associazione pel Progresso degli Studi Economici. 1875. “Verbale dell’Adunanza del Comitato di Padova del 13 febbraio 1875.” Giornale degli Economisti. 1(1): 27–47 [Figure 3.1].

    Google Scholar 

  • Boccardo, G. 1875. “Del Metodo in Economia Politica.” Giornale degli Economisti, 1(1): 110–30. [Figure 3.1].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantoni, G. 1867. “Su alcune condizioni fisiche dell’ affinità e sul moto browniano.” Il Nuovo Cimento 27: 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockshott, W.P., A.F. Cottrell, G.J. Michaelson, I.P. Wright, and V.M. Yakovenko. 2009. Classical Econophysics. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Vecchio, G.S. 1878. “Intorno all’obiettivo, al metodo e all’importanza della Scienza Statistica.” Giornale degli Economisti 7: 309–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabaglio A. 1880. Storia e teorie generale della Statistica. Milan: Hoepli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giocoli, N. 2001. “La voce Matematica da Boccardo a Debreu”. Storia del pensiero economico 42: 131–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, V. 2011. “Metodo e compiti della scienza economica. Alcuni spunti per una ricostruzione della riflessione epistemologica di A. Messedaglia.” In V. Gioia, S. Noto eds. Angelo Messedaglia e il suo tempo. Macerata: EUM. 291–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messedaglia, A. 1874. Della Scienza nell’Età Nostra ossia Dei caratteri e dell’efficacia dell’odierna cultura scientifica. Padua: Tipografia Sacchetto. [Figure 3.1].

    Google Scholar 

  • Messedaglia, A. 1885–86. Statistica. Lezioni dettate nella R. Università di Roma, nell’anno scolastico 1885–1886 raccolte da alcuni Studenti. Rome: Lit. L. Laudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messedaglia, A. 1891. L’economia politica in relazione colla sociologia e quale scienza in sé. Rome: Pallotta [Figure 3.1].

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazzagli, C. 1980. “Statistica ‘investigatrice’ e scienze ‘positive’ nell’Italia dei primi decenni unitari.” Quaderni storici 45: 779–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricca-Salerno G. 1878. “Del metodo in economia politica.” Giornale degli Economisti 8: 207–41 [Figure 3.1].

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond P., J. Mimkes, and S. Hutzler. 2013. Econophysics & Physical Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Romani, R. 1992. “Romagnosi, Messedaglia, la ‘scuola lombardo-veneta’: la costruzione di un sapere sociale.” In R. Camurri, La scienza moderata. Fedele Lampertico e l’Italia liberale, Milan: Angeli. 177–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusset, G. 2016. “Labour as Culture. The Lombardo-Veneto School.” In M. Poettinger and G. Tusset, eds. Economic Thought and History. An Unresolved Relationship. Abingdon: Routledge. 177–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusset, G. 2017. “Carlo Francesco Ferraris. La scienza dell’amministrazione.” In P. Del Negro, F. Favotto, G. Tusset, eds. L’economia all’Università di Padova, Padua: Padova University Press. 255–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tusset, G. (2018). Engineering Economics. In: From Galileo to Modern Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95612-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95612-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95611-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95612-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)