Using Topological Transformations to Construct the Intercepting Lines

  • Gocha ChavleshviliEmail author
  • Gaioz Partskhaladze
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 809)


The use of topological transformations in solving the problems of descriptive geometry is that these transformations carry out the non-uniform deformation of space, enabling one to map the non-closed curve on the line and the closed curve on the circumference. The problem is solved with the participation of projections of deformed figures, and then the result is returned to the original projection. For practical use of topical transformations, it is necessary to establish the graphically represented compatibility for each corresponding point of the transformed and initial spaces. The following positional problems are solved in the paper: (1) Any frontal contour surface having same or similarly located elliptical intersections and the triangular prism are represented. Construct their intercepting line; (2) Any frontal contour surface having identical or similarly located elliptical intersections and the horizontally projected plane are represented. Construct their intercepting line; (3) The elliptic paraboloid and frontally projected cylinder are represented. Construct their intercepting line. The results of the paper can be used to solve technical and constructive problems.


Positional problem Topological transformations Intersection line 


  1. 1.
    Barnhill, R., Farin, G., Jordan, M., Piper, B.: Surface/surface intersection. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 4(1–2), 3–16 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shamos, M., Hoey, D.: Geometric intersection problems. In: 17th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1976)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stachel, H.: Descriptive geometry in todey’s engineering curriculum. Trans. FAMENA 29(2), 35–44 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rostomashvili, Z.: Remark to the projective geometry over rings and corresponding of lattices. Bull. Georgian Acad. Sci. 160(2), 211–212 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kemkhadze, S.: Geometries which are associated with general geometric lattices. Bull. Georgian Acad. Sci. 137(3), 14–17 (1998)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Migliari, R.: Nexus Netw. J. 14(3), 555–571 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schreiber, P.: Generalized descriptive geometry. J. Geom. Graph. 6(1), 37–59 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khatiskatsi, I.: Solution of position with collinear space formations. Bull. Georgian Acad. Sci. 170(1), 113–114 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khatiskatsi, I.: Solution of space problems by means of square-law transpormation. Bull. Georgian Acad. Sci. 170(2), 307–308 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lashkhi, A.: General geometric lattices and projective geometry of modules. J. Math. Sci. 74(3), 1044–1072 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Batumi Shota Rustaveli State UniversityBatumiGeorgia

Personalised recommendations