Abstract
Wildfire management relies upon prompt detection of new ignitions and timely anticipation of a fire’s growth as influenced by local terrain, fuel characteristics and condition, and weather, notably wind. Recent advances include the Coupled Atmosphere-Wildland Fire Environment (CAWFE) modeling system, which couples a numerical weather prediction model optimized for modeling fine-scale airflows in complex terrain with fire behavior algorithms, capturing how the fire “creates its own weather”, and ingests spatially refined (375-m pixels) satellite active fire detection products from Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), igniting simulated fires ‘in progress’. Assuming regular fire mapping data, this allows an accurate forecast of fire growth for the next 12–24 h; sequences of these simulations may maintain a reasonable forecast of fire growth from detection it until it is extinguished. However, accurately anticipating a fire’s growth is a difficult forecasting challenge because of accumulating model error, stochastic processes, and intervention (i.e., firefighting), data may be missing, and some conditions are inherently less predictable. Here, we develop and apply algorithms (steered by other data) to distill new and existing (but underutilized) sources of data on wildfire detection and mapping, develop and apply algorithms to integrate asynchronous data on wildfire detection and monitoring with coupled weather–wildland fire models, and assess the improvement in wildfire detection time and forecasted fire growth. We investigate the use of additional datasets from satellites with fire detection algorithms and adjacent non-utilized passes of VIIRS to enhance simulations of the 2015 Canyon Creek Complex. These additional asynchronous data allowed 1–3 h earlier fire detection by remote sensing, allowed forecasts to begin and be delivered much earlier, and introduced several additional simulations into the cycling forecast of a three-day fire growth period. By updating the anticipated fire growth forecast more frequently, these supplemental simulations improved fire growth forecast and compensated where standard, scheduled observations were missing or obscured by clouds.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
L. Giglio, J. Descloitres, C.O. Justice, Y.J. Kaufman, An enhanced contextual fire detection algorithm for MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 87, 273–282 (2003)
C.O. Justice, L. Giglio, S. Korontzi, et al., The MODIS fire products. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 244–262 (2002)
W. Schroeder, P. Oliva, L. Giglio, I. Csiszar, The new VIIRS 375 m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 143, 85–96 (2014)
R.C. Rothermel, A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-115 (1972)
J.L. Coen, W. Schroeder, Use of spatially refined remote sensing fire detection data to initialize and evaluate coupled weather-wildfire growth model simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 5536–5541 (2013)
H. Stern, N.E. Davidson, Trends in the skill of weather prediction at lead times of 1–14 days. Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 141, 2726–2736 (2015)
M. Rochoux, Towards a more comprehensive monitoring of wildfire spread – Contributions of model evaluation and data assimilation strategies, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Centrale Paris, 2014
J. Mandel, S. Amram, J.D. Beezley, G. Kelman, A.K. Kochanski, V.Y. Kondratenko, B.H. Lynn, B. Regev, M. Vejmelka, Recent advances and applications of WRF-SFIRE. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss 14, 2829–2845 (2014)
J.L. Coen, P.J. Riggan, Simulation and thermal imaging of the 2006 Esperanza wildfire in southern California: Application of a coupled weather-wildland fire model. Int. J. Wildland Fire 23, 755–770 (2014)
W. Schroeder, P. Oliva, L. Giglio, B. Quayle, E. Lorenze, F. Morelli. Active fire detection using Landsat-8/OLI data. Remote Sens. Environ. 185, 210–220 (2016)
C.O. Justice, M.O. Róman, I. Csiszar, et al., Land and cryosphere products from Suomi NPP VIIRS: Overview and status. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos 118, 9753–9765 (2013)
I. Csiszar, W. Schroeder, L. Giglio, et al., Active fires from the Suomi NPP visible infrared imaging radiometer suite: Product status and first evaluation results. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 803–816 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020453
D. Roy, M.A. Wulder, T.R. Loveland, et al., Landsat-8: Science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sens. Environ. 145, 154–172 (2014)
L. Giglio, I. Csiszar, Á. Restás, J.T. Morisette, W. Schroeder, D. Morton, C.O. Justice, Active fire detection and characterization with the advanced Spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER). Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 3055–3063 (2008)
W. Schroeder, E. Prins, L. Giglio, I. Csiszar, C. Schmidt, J. Morisette, D. Morton, Validation of GOES and MODIS active fire detection products using ASTER and ETM+ data. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 2711–2726 (2008)
T.L. Clark, W.D. Hall, J.L. Coen, Source Code Documentation for the Clark-Hall Cloud-scale Model Code Version G3CH01. NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN-426+STR. doi: https://doi.org/10.5065/D67W694V (1996)
T.L. Clark, T. Keller, J. Coen, P. Neilley, H. Hsu, W.D. Hall, Terrain-induced turbulence over Lantau Island: 7 June 1994 tropical storm Russ case study. J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 1795–1814 (1997)
J.L. Coen, Simulation of the big elk fire using coupled atmosphere – Fire modeling. Int. J. Wildland Fire 14, 49–59 (2005)
J.L. Coen, Modeling Wildland Fires: A Description of the Coupled Atmosphere-Wildland Fire Environment Model (CAWFE). NCAR Technical Note NCAR/TN–500+STR (2013) 38 pp
T. Clark, J.L. Coen, D. Latham, Description of a coupled atmosphere–fire model. Int. J. Wildland Fire 13, 49–63 (2004)
F.A. Albini, PROGRAM BURNUP: A simulation model of the burning of large woody natural fuels. Final Report on Research Grant INT-92754-GR by U.S.F.S. to Montana State University, Mechanical Engineering Dept. (1994)
C.B. Clements, S. Zhong, S. Goodrick, et al., Observing the dynamics of wildland grass fires: FireFlux—A field validation experiment. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 1369–1382 (2007)
J.L. Coen, S. Mahalingam, J. Daily, Infrared imagery of crown-fire dynamics during FROSTFIRE. J. Appl. Meteorol. 43, 1241–1259 (2004)
R.C. Rothermel, Predicting Behavior and Size of Crown Fires in the Northern Rocky Mountains, Res. Paper INT-438 (U.S. Dep. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, 1991) 46 p
J.L. Coen, W. Schroeder, The High Park fire: Coupled weather-wildland fire model simulation of a windstorm-driven wildfire in Colorado's front range. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 131–146 (2015)
Acknowledgements
The National Science Foundation (NSF) under grant 1462247 and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under awards NNH11AS03 and NNX12AQ87G supported this work. NSF sponsors the National Center for Atmospheric Research. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are the authors’ and do not reflect the views of NSF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coen, J.L., Schroeder, W., Rudlosky, S.D. (2018). Transforming Wildfire Detection and Prediction Using New and Underused Sensor and Data Sources Integrated with Modeling. In: Blasch, E., Ravela, S., Aved, A. (eds) Handbook of Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95504-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95504-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95503-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95504-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)