Advertisement

The Dynamic Display of Social Creativity: Developing the Method of Serial Reproduction

  • Brady WagonerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the method of serial reproduction as a way of analyzing social creativity as an ongoing cultural process. The method allows us to situate creativity in its social and historical context, as well as the intricate networks of interactions that condition novel products. Furthermore, it highlights the ways in which the process and product of creativity are deeply intertwined, rather than analyzing them as disconnected as has typically been done in creativity research; in other words, creative products are analyzed as part of a cultural stream in view to understanding social and psychological processes. The chapter begins by describing the intellectual foundations of the method in an early school of anthropology focused on cultural contact and change. It then proceeds to illustrate different ways of using the method to study social creativity in both laboratory and real-world settings. The latter examples come from research on the dynamics of street art in Egypt after the 2011 uprising.

Keywords

Method of serial reproduction Cultural contact and diffusion Bartlett Memory Street art Egyptian revolution 

References

  1. Awad, S., Wagoner, B., & Glăveanu, V. (2017). The street art of resistance. In N. Chaudhary & P. Hviid (Eds.), Resistance in everyday life (pp. 161–180). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awad, S. H. (2017). Documenting a contested memory: Symbols in the changing city space of Cairo. Culture & Psychology, 23(2), 234–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awad, S. H., & Wagoner, B. (2015). Agency and creativity in the midst of social change. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Constraints of agency: Explorations of theory in everyday life (pp. 229–244). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Awad, S. H., & Wagoner, B. (2017). Street art of resistance. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Awad, S. H., & Wagoner, B. (2018). Image politics of the Arab uprisings. In B. Wagoner, F. Moghaddam, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The psychology of radical social change: From rage to revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bartlett, F. C. (1923). Psychology and primitive culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bartlett, F. C. (1926). Psychology of culture contact Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 1 (13th ed.pp. 765–771). London/New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bartlett, F. C. (1958). Thinking: An experimental and social study. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Thinking through creativity and culture: Toward an integrated model. New Brunswik, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Haddon, A. C. (1895). Evolution in art: As illustrated by the life histories of designs. London: Walter Scott Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall, K. R. L. (1950). The effect of names and titles upon the serial reproduction of pictorial and verbal material. British Journal of Psychology, 41, 109–121.Google Scholar
  15. Harré, R., & Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1998). Positioning theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Markova, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Morin, O. (2011). How traditions live and die. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Moscovici, S. (1976/2008). Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  20. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.Google Scholar
  21. Rivers. (1912). Conventionalism in primitive art (Reports of British Association for the Advancement of Science) (Sección H), 599.Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wagoner, B. (2017a). The constructive mind: Bartlett’s psychology in reconstruction. Cambridge, UK: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wagoner, B. (2017b). What makes memory constructive? A study in the serial reproduction of Bartlett’s experiments. Culture & Psychology, 23(2), 186–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagoner, B., Awad, S. H., & Bresco, I. (2018). The politics of representing the past: Symbolic spaces of positioning and irony. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Communication and PsychologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations