Advertisement

Climate for Creativity: How to Measure It in Parent – Child Relationships?

  • Joanna Maria KwaśniewskaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)

Abstract

Many parents nowadays want to know how they can foster their offspring’s creativity. The aim of this chapter is to review the literature on climate for creativity in the family context and introduce a new instrument. The Climate for Creativity in Parent-Child Relationship Questionnaire is constructed to measure and diagnose parental behaviors which may either stimulate or block a child’s creative development. Firstly, a wide range of research on the climate for creativity, particularly in the home environment, is discussed. Secondly, the characteristics, construction procedure as well as the CCP-CRQ’s psychometrical properties are described. Finally, the potential areas of application in research and psychological practice are presented.

Keywords

Child’s creativity Climate for creativity Parent-child relationship Questionnaire The climate for creativity in parent-child relationship questionnaire 

References

  1. Albert, R. S. (1971). Cognitive development and parental loss among the gifted, the exceptionally gifted, and the creative. Psychological Reports, 29, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, R. S. (1980). Family position and the attainment of eminence: A study of special family positions and special family experience. In R. S. Runco (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 141–154). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Albert, R. S. (1994). In N. Colangelo & S. Assouline (Eds.)., Talent development The contribution of early family history to the achievement of eminence (pp. 311–360). Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1986). The achievement of eminence: A model based on a longitudinal study of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 332–360). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  7. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Amabile, T. M., Burnside, R. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1995). Technical manual for KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity. Greensbor, NC: Centre for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
  9. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  10. Bloom, B. S., & Sosniak, L. A. (1981). Talent development. Educational Leadership, 39(2), 86–94.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colangelo, N. (1988). Families of gifted children: The next ten years. Roeper Review, 11, 16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihályi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dacey, J. S. (1989). Discriminating characteristics of the families of highly creative adolescents. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23(4), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalton, W., Frick-Horbury, D., & Kitzmann, K. (2006). Young adults’ retrospective reports of parenting by mothers and fathers: Associations with current relationship quality. Journal of General Psychology, 133(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Domino, G. (1969). Maternal personality correlates of sons’ creativity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 30, 150–154.Google Scholar
  18. Ekvall, G. (1999). Creative climate. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. I, pp. 403–413). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Foster, L. (2004). Early influences on creativity in great Britain. In M. Fryer (Ed.), Creativity and cultural diversity (pp. 131–136). Leeds: The Creativity Centre Educational Trust.Google Scholar
  20. Freinerg, H. J. (1999). School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (10 anniversary ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Goertzel, M. G., Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, T. G. (1978). 300 eminent personalities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Goertzel, V., Goertzel, M. G., Goertzel, T. G., & Hansen, A. (2004). Cradles of eminence: Childhoods of more than 700 famous men and women. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Gough, H. G. (1975). The California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  25. Grant, T. N. (1973). A study of masculinity-femininity in creative male adolescents and their parents (Doctoral disserta-tion, Fordham University, 1972). Dissertation Abstracts International, 33(4), 3304B.Google Scholar
  26. Griffith, J. (1999). School climate as “social order” and “social action”: A multi-level analysis of public elementary school student perceptions. Social Psychology of Education, 2, 339–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gute, G., Gute, D. S., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihályi, M. (2008). The early lives of highly creative persons: The influence of the complex family. Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Srbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Harrington, D. M., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1987). Testing aspects of Carl Rogers’s theory of creative environments: Child-rearing antecedents of creative potential in young adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Helson, R. (1968). Effects of sibling characteristics and parental values on creative interest and achievement. Journal of Personality, 36, 589–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Isaksen, S. G., & Lauer, K. J. (2002). The climate for creativity and change in teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2000–2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 171–184.Google Scholar
  35. James, L. A., & James, L. R. (1989). Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 739–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. James, L. R., Hater, J. J., Gent, M. J., & Bruni, J. R. (1978). Psychological climate: Implications from cognitive social learning theory and interactional psychology. Personnel Psychology, 31, 783–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. James, L. R., James, L. A., & Ashe, D. K. (1990). The meaning of organizations: The role of cognition and values. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 41–84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wiśniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big five personality factors as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kwaśniewska, J., & Nęcka, E. (2004). Perception of the climate for creativity in the workplace: The role of the level in the organization and gender. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2(13), 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kwaśniewska, J. M., Gralewski, J., Witkowska, E., Kostrzewska, M., & Lebuda, I. (2018). Mothers’ personality traits and the climate for creativity they build with their children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kwaśniewska, J. M., & Lebuda, I. (2017). Balancing between the roles and duties – Creativity of mothers. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 4(1), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17(7), 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McConnell, S. R., Priest, J. S., Davis, S. D., & McEvoy, M. A. (2002). Best practices in measuring growth and development for preschool children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 1231–1246). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  46. McCurdy, H. G. (1960). The childhood pattern of genius. Horizon, 2, 33–38.Google Scholar
  47. Mellou, E. (1996). The two-conditions view of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 126–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Michel, M., & Dudek, S. Z. (1991). Mother-child relationships and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 4(3), 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1999). Creative out-of-school activities in intellectually gifted adolescents as predictors of their life accomplishment in young adults: A longitudinal study. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, A. L., Lambert, A. D., & Neumeister, K. L. S. (2012). Parenting style, perfectionism, and creativity in high-ability and high-achieving young adults. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(4), 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller, B. C., & Gerard, D. (1979). Family influences on the development of creativity in children: An integrative review. Family Coordinator, 28, 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nęcka, E., & Kwaśniewska, J. (2005). Climate for creativity in Polish companies: Does a new market economy need new ideas? In W. B. Jostingmeier & H. J. Boeddrich (Eds.), 8th European Conference on Creativity and Innovation – Conference Proceedings Book (pp. 237–259). Mainz: Deutsche Universitas Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Nichols, R. C. (1964). Parental attitudes of mothers of intelligent adolescents and creativity of their children. Child Development, 35, 1041–1049.Google Scholar
  54. Niedziałek, A. & Kwaśniewska, J. M. (in preparation). Climate for Creativity in Parent-Child Relationship in the Perception of Mothers and Fathers. Creativity Theories – Research – Applications.Google Scholar
  55. Orinstein, A. S. (1961). An investigation of parental child-rearing attitudesand creativity in children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, 1961). Dissertation Abstracts Inter-national, 22, 4085–5086.Google Scholar
  56. Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., Altmann, R. A., Lacost, H. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2003). Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Puccio, M. Mance, M. C. Murdock, B. Miller, J. Vehar, R. Firestien, S. Thurber, & D. Nielsen. (2011). Educating for creativity. Level 1. Resource book. Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar
  59. Richards, R. (1990). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health: “Afterview” for CRJ issues on creativity and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Robinson, C. C., Mandleco, B., Olsen, S. F., & Hart, C. H. (1995). Authoritative, authoritarian and permissive parenting practices: Development of a new measure. Psychological Reports, 77, 819–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Robinson, C. C., Mandleco, B., Olsen, S. F., & Hart, C. H. (2001). The parenting styles and dimension Questionnaire (PSDQ). In B. F. Perlmutter, J. Touliatos, & G. W. Holden (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques: Vol. 3. Instruments & index. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Rousseau, D. M. (1988). The construction of climate in organizational research. In W. L. C. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 139–158). Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  63. Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Oxford: Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
  64. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(3), 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2005). Parents’ personality and the creative potential of exceptionally gifted boys. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schneider, B. (2002). Climate strength: A new direction for climate research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. (1995). Winning the service game. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  68. Schneider, S. H., & Duran, L. (2010). School climate in middle schools: A cultural perspective. Journal of Research in Character Education, 8, 25–37.Google Scholar
  69. Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2016). A history of modern psychology (11th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  70. Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tennent, L., & Berthelsen, D. (1997). Creativity: What does it mean in the family context? Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 1, 91–104.Google Scholar
  72. van Houte, M. (2005). Climate or culture? A plea for conceptual clarity in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walberg, H. J. (1981). Childhood traits and environments of highly eminent adults. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walberg, H. J., Zhang, G., Cummings, C., Fillipelli, L. A., Freeman, K. A., Haller, E. P., et al. (1996). Childhood traits and experiences of eminent women. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 315–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  77. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySWPS University of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations