Advertisement

Imaginative Play, Socio-emotional Competence, and Sociometric Status in Preschool Children: Common Methodological Problems and New Research Directions

  • Dorota Maria Jankowska
  • Iwona Omelańczuk
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)

Abstract

Positive and effective functioning within a peer group has significant importance in the lives of even very young children. Imaginative play is considered important for the development of children’s cognitive and social skills. The following chapter provides a proposal for research on the relationship between imaginative play, socio-emotional competence, and the sociometric status of preschool children. The paper concludes with a discussion of methodological challenges in assessing children’s social competence, sociometric status, and diagnostic tasks measuring imaginative play.

Keywords

Imaginative play Peer group Sociometric status Social competence Preschool children 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by The Maria Grzegorzewska University (grant BSTM 1/16-I).

References

  1. Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1995). Theory of mind development and social understanding. Cognition & Emotion, 9(2–3), 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bierman, K. L., & Welsh, J. A. (2000). Assessing social dysfunction: The contributions of laboratory and performance-based measures. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29(4), 526–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosco, F. M., Friedman, O., & Leslie, A. M. (2006). Recognition of pretend and real actions in play by 1- and 2-year-olds: Early success and why they fail. Cognitive Development, 21(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byom, L. J., & Mutlu, B. (2013). Theory of mind: Mechanisms, methods, and new directions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Social, emotional, and personality development in context. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82–99). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75(1), 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colwell, M. J., & Lindsey, E. W. (2005). Preschool Children’s pretend and physical play and sex of play partner: Connections to peer competence. Sex Roles, 52(7–8), 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connolly, J. A., Doyle, A. B., & Reznick, E. (1988). Social pretend play and social interaction in preschoolers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 9(3), 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cordiano, T. J., Russ, S. W., & Short, E. J. (2008). Development and validation of the affect in Play Scale–Brief Rating version (APS–BR). Journal of Personality Assessment, 90(1), 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creasey, G. L., Jarvis, P. A., & Berk, L. E. (1998). Play and social competence. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), SUNY series, early childhood education: Inquiries and insights. Multiple perspectives on play in early childhood educationAlbany (pp. 116–143). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Denham, S. A., McKinley, M., Couchoud, E. A., & Holt, R. (1990). Emotional and behavioral predictors of preschool peer ratings. Child Development, 61(4), 1145–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn, J., & Cutting, A. L. (2001). Understanding others, and individual differences in friendship interactions in young children. Social Development, 8(2), 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hager, J. C. (2002). Facial action coding system: The manual. Salt Lake City: Research Nexus.Google Scholar
  16. Galyer, K. T., & Evans, I. M. (2001). Pretend play and the development of emotion regulation in preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 166(1), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gebart-Eaglemont, J. E., & Foddy, M. (1994). Creative potential and the sociometric status of children. Creativity Research Journal, 7(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gresham, F. A., & Elliott, N. S. (1990). Social skills rating system manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Grob, A., Meyer, C. S., & Hagmann-von Arx, P. (2013). Intelligence and Development Scales (IDS) (2nd ed.). Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
  20. Halle, T. G., & Darling-Churchill, K. E. (2016). Review of measures of social and emotional development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 45, 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howes, C., & Matheson, C. C. (1992). Sequences in the development of competent play with peers: Social and social pretend play. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 961–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, S. M., Zaslow, M., Darling-Churchill, K. E., & Halle, T. G. (2016). Assessing early childhood social and emotional development: Key conceptual and measurement issues. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 45, 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krasnor, L. R. (1997). The nature of social competence: A theoretical review. Social Development, 6(1), 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lau, S., & Li, W. (1996). Peer status and perceived creativity: Are popular children viewed by peers and teachers as creative. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94(4), 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lillard, A. S. (1993). Pretend play skills and the Childs theory of mind. Child Development, 64(2), 348–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lillard, A. S., & Kavanaugh, R. D. (2014). The contribution of symbolic skills to the development of an explicit theory of mind. Child Development, 85(4), 1535–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lillard, A. S., Lerner, M. D., Hopkins, E. J., Dore, R. A., Smith, E. D., & Palmquist, C. M. (2013). The impact of pretend play on children’s development: A review of the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindsey, E. W., & Colwell, M. J. (2013). Pretend and physical play: Links to preschoolers’ affective social competence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59(3), 330–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mostow, A. J., Izard, C. E., Fine, S., & Trentacosta, C. J. (2002). Modeling emotional, cognitive, and behavioral predictors of peer acceptance. Child Development, 73, 1775–1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nielsen, M., & Dissanayake, C. (2000). An investigation of pretend play, mental state terms and false belief understanding: In search of a metarepresentational link. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 609–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Northway, M. L., Rooks, M. M., & Moreno, J. L. (1955). Creativity and sociometric status in children. Sociometry, 18(4), 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Root-Bernstein, M. (2014). Inventing imaginary worlds: From childhood play to adult creativity across the arts and sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  35. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon (Editor-in-Chief) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (5th ed., pp. 619–700). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  37. Russ, S. W. (2004). Play in child development and psychotherapy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  38. Russ, S. W. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. Washington, DC: APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seja, A. L., & Russ, S. W. (1999). Childrens fantasy play and emotional understanding. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28(2), 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (1990). The house of make-believe children’s play and the developing imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Stagnitti, K. (2004). Understanding play: The implications for play assessment. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 51(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swindells, D., & Stagnitti, K. (2006). Pretend play and parents’ view of social competence: The construct validity of the child-initiated pretend play Assessment. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 53(4), 314–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, M., Carlson, S. M., Maring, B. L., Gerow, L., & Charley, C. M. (2004). The characteristics and correlates of fantasy in school-age children: Imaginary companions, impersonation, and social understanding. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1173–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 88(88), 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vygotsky, L. S. (1976). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, & K. Sylva (Eds.), Play: Its role in development and evolution (pp. 537–554). Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  47. Wallace, C. E., & Russ, S. W. (2015). Pretend play, divergent thinking, and math achievement in girls: A longitudinal study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(3), 296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weitzman, E., & Greenberg, J. (2002). Learning language and loving it: A guide to promoting children’s social, language, and literacy development in early childhood settings. Toronto: The Hanen Centre.Google Scholar
  49. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamamoto, K. (1964). Creativity and Sociometric choice among adolescents. The Journal of Social Psychology, 64(2), 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yamamoto, K., Lembright, M. L., & Corrigan, A. M. (1966). Intelligence, creative thinking, and Sociometric choice among fifth-grade children. The Journal of Experimental Education, 34(3), 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yawkey, T. D., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2018). Child’s play: Developmental and applied. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Youngblade, L. M., & Dunn, J. (1995). Individual differences in young Childrens pretend play with mother and sibling: Links to relationships and understanding of other peoples feelings and beliefs. Child Development, 66(5), 1472–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorota Maria Jankowska
    • 1
  • Iwona Omelańczuk
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Special EducationThe Maria Grzegorzewska UniversityWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations