Classroom Creative Climate: From a Static to a Dynamic Perspective

  • Maciej KarwowskiEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)


The concept of creative climate has been popular in the organizational literature since the late 1970s. As a result, several different theories and models of “creative climate” or a “climate conducive to creativity” were proposed and empirically tested over the years. Recent syntheses operationalize creative climate as a number (usually about a dozen) of interdependent dimensions, primarily related to interpersonal relationships and task-related activities. In this chapter, I briefly review these models and call for a more dynamic micro-assessment of creative climate in the classroom. Briefly discussing psychometric results and observational findings, I posit that the notion of creative climate as something stable that characterizes a class or a school, may be enriched with a more dynamic, situation-based concept of a creative climate, which argues that creative climate sometimes happens in the here-and-now of the classroom rather than serves as its stable characteristic. Such an emergent perspective of creative climate implies a different approach to measurement but it also presents a more inclusive epistemological perspective to untangle its nuances and complexities fully.


Creative climate Context Emergence Classroom Education 



Preparation of this chapter was possible thanks to the funding obtained from the National Science Centre, Poland (UMO-2016/22/E/HS6/00118).


  1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (in press). Unfreezing creativity: A dynamic micro-longitudinal approach. In R. A. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic perspectives on creativity: New directions for theory, research, and practice in education. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (2006). Social, emotional, ethical, and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy, and well-being. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 201–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a system perspective for the study of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. De Dreu, C. K., & van Dijk, M. A. (2018). Climatic shocks associate with innovation in science and technology. PLoS One, 13(1), e0190122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (2016). Shaping school culture. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diedrich, J., Jauk, E., Silvia, P. J., Gredlein, J. M., Neubauer, A. C., & Benedek, M. (2018). Assessment of real-life creativity: The Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 304–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epskamp, S., Rhemtulla, M., & Borsboom, D. (2017). Generalized network psychometrics: Combining network and latent variable models. Psychometrika, 82, 904–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freiberg, H. J. (2005). School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glăveanu, V. P. (2010a). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glăveanu, V. P. (2010b). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Culture & Psychology, 16, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glăveanu, V. P., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). The difference that makes a ‘creative’ difference in education. In R. A. Beghetto & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education (pp. 37–54). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Karwowski, M. (2018). Are people working together inclined towards practicality? A process analysis of creative ideation in individuals and dyads. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Advance online publication.
  20. Glăveanu, V. P., & Lahlou, S. (2012). Through the creator’s eyes: Using the subjective camera to study craft creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Dimensions of creative climate. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 15, 97–116.Google Scholar
  23. Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karwowski, M. (2009). Klimat dla kreatywności: koncepcje, metody, badania [Climate for creativity: Models, methods, research]. Warszawa: Centrum Doradztwa i Informacji Difin.Google Scholar
  25. Karwowski, M. (2011a). The creative mix: Teacher’s creative leadership, school creative climate, and students’ creative self-efficacy. Chowanna, 2, 25–43.Google Scholar
  26. Karwowski, M. (2011b). Teacher personality as predictor of perceived climate for creativity. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 21, 37–52.Google Scholar
  27. Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2013). Extending climato-economic theory: When, how, and why it explains differences in nations’ creativity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 493–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Scalas, L. F. (2014). Doubly latent multilevel analyses of classroom climate: An illustration. Journal of Experimental Education, 82, 143–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pelz, D. C. (1967). Creative tensions in the research and development climate: Technical achievement of scientists and engineers was high under conditions that seemed antithetical. Science, 157(3785), 160–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rubenstein, L. D., Callan, G. L., & Ridgley, L. M. (2017). Anchoring the creative process within a self-regulated learning framework: Inspiring assessment methods and future research. Educational Psychology Review. Scholar
  34. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simonton, D. K. (1975). Age and literary creativity: A cross-cultural and transhistorical survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van de Vliert, E. (2013). Climato-economic habitats support patterns of human needs, stresses, and freedoms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(5), 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van de Vliert, E., & Murray, D. R. (2018). Climate and creativity: Cold and heat trigger invention and innovation in richer populations. Creativity Research Journal, 30, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Houtte, M. (2005). Climate or culture? A plea for conceptual clarity in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of WroclawWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations