Advertisement

Life in the Cyber-Physical Society: The Need for Organic Creativity

Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)

Abstract

In this reflection, we consider the impact of the evolution of technology on our path towards the Post-Information Society, leading to fundamental ultimate and proximal questions about the future of the human species and its role in future cyber-physical collaborations. While there is a current tendency to believe that the correct answer for the educational system is the introduction of computational thinking as a subject for all, we maintain that this set of skills will not be sufficient, and indeed not the most important one. Our well-being from both psychological and social points of view, as well as the preservation of our specific role in the economy, will depend on the development of the specifically human traits and abilities related to organic creativity.

Keywords

Creativity Organic creativity Post-information society Computational thinking 

References

  1. Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G. E. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of irrelevance processing as moderator of openness and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alessi, G. (1992). Models of proximate and ultimate causation in psychology. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1359–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  5. Colton, S., de Mántaras, R. L., & Stock, O. (2009). Computational creativity: Coming of age. AI Magazine, 30(3), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corazza, G. E. (2017a). Creativity and anticipation. In R. Poli (Ed.), Handbook of anticipation. Theoretical and applied aspects of the use of future in decision making. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Corazza, G. E. (2017b). Organic creativity for well-being in the post-information society. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corazza, G. E., Pedone, R., & Vanelli-Coralli, A. (2010). Technology as a need: Trends in the evolving information society. Advances in Electronics and Telecommunications, 1, 124–132.Google Scholar
  10. Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. A. (Eds.). (2010). The dark side of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2017). Computational Thinking in Education: Where does it fit? A systematic literary review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07659.Google Scholar
  13. Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2016). How has the internet reshaped human cognition? The Neuroscientist, 22(5), 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu, J. J., & Fletcher, G. H. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 260–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lutz, W., O’Neill, B. C., & Scherbov, S. (2003). Europe’s population at a turning point. Science, 299(5615), 1991–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishra, P., Yadav, A., & Deep-Play Research Group. (2013). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century. TechTrends, 57(3), 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Poli, R. (2010). The many aspects of anticipation. Foresight-The Journal of Future Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 12(3), 7–17.Google Scholar
  19. Rosa, H. (2003). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high–speed society. Constellations, 10(1), 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Whitehead, A. N. (1978/1929). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (D. R. Griffin and D. W. Sherburne, ed., Corrected Edition). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DEI Department, Marconi Institute for CreativityUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations