Advertisement

The Sociocultural Context of Exceptional Creativity: Historiometric Studies

  • Dean Keith SimontonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)

Abstract

As pointed out in an earlier chapter, historiometry is distinctively suited to studying the social and cultural aspects of creative genius. In this chapter I review some central empirical findings using this technique. The review focuses on three levels of analyses: the creative product, the creative person, and the creative society. Moreover, the treatment scrutinizes creative genius as both (a) a sociocultural cause (e.g., eminence achieved for creative contributions to a culturally-valued domain) and (b) a sociocultural effect (e.g., the consequence of role-model availability, interpersonal networks, political circumstances, cultural diversity, and prevailing ideologies). The collective results provide a rich basis for any social psychology of creativity.

Keywords

Creative genius Achieved eminence Sociocultural context Social psychology 

References

  1. Borowiecki, K. J. (2014). Artistic creativity and extreme events: The heterogeneous impact of war on composers’ production. Poetics, 47, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carson, S. H. (2014). Cognitive disinhibition, creativity, and psychopathology. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 198–221). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Cerulo, K. A. (1984). Social disruption and its effects on music: An empirical analysis. Social Forces, 62, 885–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2014). Diversifying experiences in the development of genius and their impact on creative cognition. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 375–393). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2015). Four perspectives on creativity. In R. A. Scott & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–15). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. (2014). Evaluating excellence in the arts. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 511–532). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Gray, C. E. (1966). A measurement of creativity in Western civilization. American Anthropologist, 68, 1384–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hellmanzik, C. (2014). Prominent modern artists: Determinants of creativity. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 564–585). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, B. F., Reedy, E. J., & Weinberg, B. A. (2014). Age and scientific genius. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 422–450). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kozbelt, A. (2007). A quantitative analysis of Beethoven as self-critic: Implications for psychological theories of musical creativity. Psychology of Music, 35, 144–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kozbelt, A. (2014). Musical creativity over the lifespan. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 451–472). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Kozbelt, A., & Burger-Pianko, Z. (2007). Words, music, and other measures: Predicting the repertoire popularity of 597 Schubert lieder. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kroeber, A. L. (1944). Configurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lamb, D., & Easton, S. M. (1984). Multiple discovery. Avebury, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar
  18. Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Martindale, C. (2007). Recent trends in the psychological study of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25, 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCrae, R. R., & Greenberg, D. M. (2014). Openness to experience. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 222–243). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. McKay, A. S., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Literary geniuses: Their life, work, and death. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 473–487). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  23. Naroll, R., Benjamin, E. C., Fohl, F. K., Fried, M. J., Hildreth, R. E., & Schaefer, J. M. (1971). Creativity: A cross-historical pilot survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Price, D. (1978). Ups and downs in the pulse of science and technology. In J. Gaston (Ed.), The sociology of science (pp. 162–171). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Shadish, W. R., Jr., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Gupta, S. K. S. (1995). Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25, 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simonton, D. K. (1976a). The causal relation between war and scientific discovery: An exploratory cross-national analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 7, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simonton, D. K. (1976b). Do Sorokin’s data support his theory?: A study of generational fluctuations in philosophical beliefs. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 15, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Simonton, D. K. (1976c). Ideological diversity and creativity: A re-evaluation of a hypothesis. Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Simonton, D. K. (1976d). Philosophical eminence, beliefs, and zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 630–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Simonton, D. K. (1976e). The sociopolitical context of philosophical beliefs: A transhistorical causal analysis. Social Forces, 54, 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simonton, D. K. (1977a). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simonton, D. K. (1977b). Eminence, creativity, and geographic marginality: A recursive structural equation model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 805–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simonton, D. K. (1980). Techno-scientific activity and war: A yearly time-series analysis, 1500–1903 A.D. Scientometrics, 2, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simonton, D. K. (1983a). Dramatic greatness and content: A quantitative study of eighty-one Athenian and Shakespearean plays. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Simonton, D. K. (1983b). Intergenerational transfer of individual differences in hereditary monarchs: Genetic, role-modeling, cohort, or sociocultural effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simonton, D. K. (1986). Aesthetic success in classical music: A computer analysis of 1935 compositions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 4, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Galtonian genius, Kroeberian configurations, and emulation: A generational time-series analysis of Chinese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simonton, D. K. (1989). Shakespeare’s sonnets: A case of and for single-case historiometry. Journal of Personality, 57, 695–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simonton, D. K. (1990a). Lexical choices and aesthetic success: A computer content analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 251–264.Google Scholar
  42. Simonton, D. K. (1990b). Psychology, science, and history: An introduction to historiometry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simonton, D. K. (1991). Latent-variable models of posthumous reputation: A quest for Galton’s G. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 607–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simonton, D. K. (1992a). Gender and genius in Japan: Feminine eminence in masculine culture. Sex Roles, 27, 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Simonton, D. K. (1992b). Leaders of American psychology, 1879–1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simonton, D. K. (1992c). The social context of career success and course for 2,026 scientists and inventors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 452–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simonton, D. K. (1996). Individual genius and cultural configurations: The case of Japanese civilization. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 354–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simonton, D. K. (1997a). Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simonton, D. K. (1997b). Imagery, style, and content in 37 Shakespeare plays. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simonton, D. K. (1998). Fickle fashion versus immortal fame: Transhistorical assessments of creative products in the opera house. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simonton, D. K. (2000). The music or the words? Or, how important is the libretto for an opera’s aesthetic success? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18, 105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simonton, D. K. (2004). Thematic content and political context in Shakespeare’s dramatic output, with implications for authorship and chronology controversies. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simonton, D. K. (2009). The “other IQ”: Historiometric assessments of intelligence and related constructs. Review of General Psychology, 13, 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simonton, D. K. (2013). What is a creative idea? Little-c versus big-C creativity. In J. Chan & K. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 69–83). Cheltenham Glos, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  57. Simonton, D. K. (2014a). Historiometric studies of genius. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 87–106). Oxford, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  58. Simonton, D. K. (2014b). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simonton, D. K. (2015a). Numerical odds and evens in Beethoven’s nine symphonies: Can a computer really tell the difference? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 33, 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Simonton, D. K. (2015b). Psychology as a science within Comte’s hypothesized hierarchy: Empirical investigations and conceptual implications. Review of General Psychology, 19, 334–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Simonton, D. K. (2017, April 6). Intellectual genius in the Islamic Golden Age: Cross-civilization replications, extensions, and modifications. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simonton, D. K. (in press). Creativity in sociocultural systems: Cultures, nations, and civilizations. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of group creativity and innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Simonton, D. K., & Ting, S.-S. (2010). Creativity in Eastern and Western civilizations: The lessons of historiometry. Management and Organization Review, 6, 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sinatra, R., Wang, D., Deville, P., Song, C., & Barabási, A.-L. (2016, November 4). Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354, aaf5239.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sorokin, P. A. (1937–1941). Social and cultural dynamics (Vols. 1–4). New York: American Book.Google Scholar
  66. Sternberg, R. J., & Gordeeva, T. (1996). The anatomy of impact: What makes an article influential? Psychological Science, 7, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yuasa, M. (1974). The shifting center of scientific activity in the West: From the sixteenth to the twentieth century. In N. Shigeru, D. L. Swain, & Y. Eri (Eds.), Science and society in modern Japan (pp. 81–103). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California, DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations