Advertisement

Microgenetic Analysis and Creativity: Analyzing Psychological Change Processes

  • Mônica Souza Neves-Pereira
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)

Abstract

Microgenetic analysis designates a type of idiographic and qualitative research that allows investigating developmental processes by conducting micro-analyses of social interactions among subjects in structured and natural activities and in specific settings circumscribed by chronological – thus, irreversible – time. The cultural psychology of creativity considers that creativity as a phenomenon originates from human interactions semiotically mediated by their socio-cultural contexts, which evolve in the course of ontogenesis by means of dialectical and dialogical processes. The merger of microgenesis and research in creativity has significantly contributed to research in this field, by enabling in-depth analyses of the genesis and development of creativity, including developmental changes and transformations experienced by interacting subjects in the contexts under study.

Keywords

Creativity Microgenesis Human development 

References

  1. Alessandrini, C. D. (2003). A microgênese na oficina criativa. Revista de Psicopedagogia, 20(63), 270–291.Google Scholar
  2. Brinkmann, S., Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2014). Historical overview of qualitative research in the social sciences. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 697–1658). New York: Oxford University Press E-book ISBN 978–0–19-981175-5.Google Scholar
  3. Garvey, A. P. (2014). Emoções e comunicação como um sistema dinâmico: abordagem histórico-relacional. Em M. C. D. P. Lyra, A. P. Garvey, M. Silva & E. C. Chaves (Orgs.), Microgênese. Um estudo do processo de mudança (pp. 21–51). Recife, Brazil: Editora UFPE.Google Scholar
  4. Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glaveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity. New York: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, early view, 49, 165.  https://doi.org/10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glăveanu, V. P. (2016). The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research. London: Macmillan Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Valsiner, J. (2015). Rethinking creativity. Contributions from social and cultural psychology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Glăveanu, V. P., & Neves-Pereira, M. S. (in press). Psicologia cultural da criatividade. In M. S. Neves-Pereira & D. S. Fleith (Orgs.). Teorias da criatividade. Campinas: Editora Papirus.Google Scholar
  10. Glicksohn, J., & Yonai, S. (2010). Creativity and impulsivity in the lab: A microgenetic approach. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 397–401.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.523407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Góes, M. C. R. (2000). A abordagem microgenética na matriz histórico-cultural: Uma perspectiva para o estudo da constituição da subjetividade. Cadernos CEDES, XX(50), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gralewski, J. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and possibilities for its development in polish high schools: A qualitative study. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 3(2), 294–329.Google Scholar
  13. Lavelli, M., Pantoja, A. P. F., Hsu, H. C., Messinger, D., & Fogel, A. (2008). Using Microgenetic Designs to Study Change Processes. In D. M. Teti (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Developmental Science (pp. 40–65). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756676.ch3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neves-Pereira, M. S. (2004). Criatividade na Educação Infantil: Um estudo sociocultural construtivista de concepções e práticas de educadores (Tese de Doutorado). Universidade de Brasília, Brasília – DF.Google Scholar
  15. Neves-Pereira, M. S. (in press). Posições conceituais da criatividade.Google Scholar
  16. Neves-Pereira, M. S., & Branco, A. U. (2015). Criatividade na educação infantil: contribuições da psicologia cultural para a investigação de concepções e práticas de educadores. Estudos de Psicologia, 20(3), 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palega, A. K. (2015). Creative engagement in everyday life – Learning from aesthetic experience. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2(2), 212–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rojas-Drummond, S. M., Albarrán, C. D., & Littleton, K. S. (2008). Collaboration, creativity and the co-construction of oral and written texts. Thinking skills and creativity, 3(3), 177–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenthal, V. (2006). On the proper treatment of microgenesis. In Second Language, Culture and Mind Conference (LCM 2006). (pp. 117–118), France. LCM Organization. halshs-00125699Google Scholar
  20. Sato, T., Yasuda, Y., Kido, A., Arakawa, A., Mizoguchi, H., & Valsiner, J. (2007). Sampling reconsidered. Idiographic science and the analyses of personal life trajectories. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 82–106). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sullivan, F. R. (2011). Serious and playful inquiry: Epistemological aspects of collaborative creativity. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
  22. Tateo, L., & Marsico, G. (2014). Open complementarity in cultural psychology. In B. Wagoner, N. Chaudhary & P. Hviid (Orgs). Cultural psychology and its future. Complementarity in a new key (pp. 1593–1880). Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing INC. E-book: 978-1-62396-627-0.Google Scholar
  23. Valsiner, J. (2017). From methodology to methods in human psychology. Theoretical Advances in Psychology. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Teoria e método em psicologia. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Martins Fontes.Google Scholar
  25. Werner, H. (1956). Microgenesis and aphasia. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yokochi, S., & Okada, T. (2005). Creative cognitive process of art making: A field study of a traditional Chinese ink painter. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2&3), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mônica Souza Neves-Pereira
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational and Developmental PsychologyThe University of BrasiliaBrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations