• Christopher J. FergusonEmail author


The impact of video games is often debated in society, sometimes in response to tragic shootings, sometimes in regard to potential positive outcomes. At times, these debates can become acrimonious and unproductive, even among scholars. However, there are also excellent opportunities for scholars to dialogue and debate across differences. Such debates can be both intellectually stimulating and fun. This book covers some of the major debates related to video games with opposing scholars on each issue. It is hoped that this approach will demonstrate that video game debates needn’t always be heated. Even if scholars differ in respect to their views of video game influences, we can still part as friends.


Video games Debates Moral panic Controversy 


  1. Cognitive Training Data. (2014). An open letter to the Stanford Center on Longevity.
  2. Crecente, B. (2018). Video games remain an easy out for politicians, but change will come with time. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from:
  3. Salam, M., & Stack, L. (2018). Do video games lead to mass shootings? Researchers Say No. New York Times. Retrieved from:
  4. Stanford Center on Longevity. (2014). A consensus on the brain training industry from the scientific community.
  5. State’s Attorney for the Judicial District of Dansbury. (2013). Report of the State’s Attorney for the Judicial District of Danbury on the Shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School and 36 Yogananda Street, Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. Danbury, CT: Office of the state’s attorney judicial district of Danbury.Google Scholar
  6. Virginia Tech Review Panel. (2007). Report of the Virginia Tech Review Panel. Retrieved 11/11/07 from:

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStetson UniversityDeLandUSA

Personalised recommendations