Skip to main content

Challenging Māori Imprisonment and Human Rights Ritualism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights and Incarceration

Abstract

United Nations’ (UN) reports have consistently shown concern over the high levels of incarceration of Māori. Drawing upon documentary analysis and interviews with Māori engaged in human rights and imprisonment work, this chapter shows how the New Zealand state manages its international human rights engagements in terms of ritualism and selective endorsement. Nonetheless, Māori engagement with the UN, and especially with Indigenous rights, remain vital in the challenge to discriminatory criminal justice system practices and to incarceration. This must be dovetailed with actions to subvert ritualism, by imagining new worlds beyond the prison, and to consolidate social, economic and cultural justice for Māori.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adcock, F. (2012). The UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples and New Zealand: A study in compliance ritualism. New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, 10, 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaya, J. (2011). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Rights of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya. Addendum: The Situation of Maori in New Zealand. A/HRC/18/35/Add.4. Geneva: UNHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrae, D., McIntosh, T., & Coster, S. (2017). Marginalised: An insider’s view of the state, state policies in New Zealand and gang formation. Critical Criminology, 25(1), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, E., McCausland, R., Dowse, L., & McEntyre, E. (2015). A Predictable and Preventable Path: Aboriginal People with Mental and Cognitive Disabilities in the Criminal Justice System. Sydney: UNSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S. (2001). The land of murder, cannibalism, and all kinds of atrocious crimes? An overview of ‘Māori crime’ from pre-colonial times to the present day. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, H. (2010). Swimming to Cambodia: Justice and ritual in human rights after conflict. Australian Year Book of International Law, 29, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, H., & Larking, E. (2015). Introduction: The regulatory power of the universal periodic review. In H. Charlesworth & E. Larking (Eds.), Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review (pp. 1–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters, C. (2010). A self-determination approach to justifying indigenous peoples’ participation in international law and policy-making. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 17, 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, J. (2015). The universal periodic review as a public audit ritual. In H. Charlesworth & E. Larking (Eds.), Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review (pp. 42–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., & Tauri, J. (2016). Indigenous Criminology. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Corrections. (2007). Over-Representation of Māori in the Criminal Justice System. Wellington: Department of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Corrections. (2017). Prison Facts and Statistics—December 2016. Wellington: Department of Corrections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erueti, A. (2017). The sovereignty of human rights symposium: The politics of international indigenous rights. University of Toronto Law Journal. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.3138/UTLJ.67.5. Accessed February 8, 2018.

  • Iorns Magallanes, C. (1999). International human rights and their impact on domestic law on indigenous peoples’ rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. In P. Havemann (Ed.), Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand (pp. 235–277). Auckland: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (1988). The Māori and the Criminal Justice System: He Whaipaanga Hou—A New Perspective. Wellington: New Zealand Department of Justice Policy and Research Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2007). The journey from a Spanish monastery to Whitianga. Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence, 10, 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • JustSpeak. (2014). Unlocking Prisons: How We Can Improve New Zealand’s Prison System. Wellington: JustSpeak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, S. (2012). Selective endorsement without intent to implement: Indigenous rights and the anglosphere. The International Journal of Human Rights, 16(1), 100–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, T. (2011). Marginalisation: A case study: Confinement. In T. McIntosh & M. Mullholland (Eds.), Māori and Social Issues (pp. 263–283). Wellington: Huia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, L. (2017, April 11). Waitangi Tribunal finds corrections failing Māori on reoffending rates. Radio New Zealand. [Online]. Available http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/328603/corrections-’open-to-any-ideas’-over-Māori-reoffending. Accessed February 8, 2018.

  • Mihaere, R. (2015). A kaupapa Māori analysis of the use of Māori cultural identity in the prison system. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikaere, A. (2007). Seeing human rights through Māori eyes. Yearbook of New Zealand Jurisprudence, 10, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B. (2009). Identifying and Responding to Bias in the Criminal Justice System. Wellington: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Police. (2017). Recorded Crime Victims and Offenders Statistics (RCVS and RCOS). Wellington: New Zealand Police.

    Google Scholar 

  • NZ Herald. (2005, March 14). Prime Minister critical of UN committee’s process. NZ Herald. [Online]. Available http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10115177. Accessed February 8, 2018.

  • Quince, K. (2007). Māori and the criminal justice system in New Zealand. In J. Tolmie & W. Brooksbanks (Eds.), The New Zealand Criminal Justice System (pp. 333–358). Auckland: Lexis Nexis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvation Army. (2017). Off the Track: State of the Nation Report. Auckland: Salvation Army Social Policy and Parliamentary Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, E. (2016). The Road to Hell: State Violence Against Children in Postwar New Zealand. Auckland: Auckland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavenhagen, R. (2006). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous People, Rodolfo Stavenhagen. Addendum: Mission to New Zealand. E/CN.4/2006/78/Add.3. Geneva: UNHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauri, J., & Webb, R. (2012). A critical appraisal of responses to Māori offending. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 3(4), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toki, V. (2011). Indigenous rights—Hollow rights? Waikato Law Review, 19(2), 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee Against Torture [UNCAT]. (2009a). Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: List of Issues to be Considered During the Examination of the Fifth Periodic Report of New Zealand. CAT/C/NZL/Q/5. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CAT/C/NZL/Q/5. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee Against Torture [UNCAT]. (2009b). Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: Written Replies by New Zealand to the List of Issues (CAT/C/NZL/Q/5) to Be Taken Up in Connection with the Consideration of the Fifth Periodic Report of New Zealand. CAT/C/NZL/Q/5/Add.1. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CAT/C/NZL/Q/5/Add.1. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee Against Torture [UNCAT]. (2009c). Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 19 of the Convention, Concluding Observations of the Committee Against Torture, New Zealand. CAT/C/NZL/CO/5. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CAT/C/NZL/CO/5. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee Against Torture [UNCAT]. (2012). List of Issues Prepared by the Committee Prior to the Submission of the Sixth Periodic Report of New Zealand (CAT/C/NZL/6)* Adopted by the Committee at Its Forty-Eighth Session. CAT/C/NZL/Q/6. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CAT/C/NZL/Q/6. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee Against Torture [UNCAT]. (2014). Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 19 of the Convention Pursuant to the Optional Reporting Procedure, New Zealand. CAT/C/NZL/6. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CAT/C/NZL/6. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee Against Torture [UNCAT]. (2015). Concluding Observations on the Sixth Periodic Report of New Zealand. CAT/C/NZL/CO/6. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CAT/C/NZL/CO/6. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [UNCERD]. (2006). Reports Submitted by State Parties Under Article 9 of the Convention. Addendum, New Zealand. CERD/C/NZL/17. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CERD/C/NZL/17. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [UNCERD]. (2007a). Answers to Questions Put by the Rapporteur in Connection with the Consideration of the 15th to 17th Periodic Reports of New Zealand (CERD/C/NZL/17).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [UNCERD]. (2007b). Opening Statement to the Presentation of the 15th–17th Periodic Reports of New Zealand by Ambassador Don MacKay. United Nations, Geneva, 31 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [UNCERD]. (2007c). Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. A/62/18. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/A/62/18. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [UNCERD]. (2012). Reports Submitted by State Parties Under Article 9 of the Convention. Eighteenth to Twentieth Periodic Reports of States Parties due in 2011: New Zealand. CERD/C/NZL/18-20. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CERD/C/NZL/18-20. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [UNCERD]. (2013). Summary Record of the 2221st Meeting. CERD/C/SR.2221. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CERD/C/SR.2221. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination [UNCERD]. (2016). Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 9 of the Convention, New Zealand. CERD/C/NZL/21-22. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CERD/C/NZL/21-22. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Human Rights Committee [UNHRC]. (2015). Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant Pursuant to the Optional Reporting Procedure, New Zealand. CCPR/C/NZL/6. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CCPR/C/NZL/6. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • UN Human Rights Committee [UNHRC]. (2016). Concluding Observations on the Sixth Periodic Report of New Zealand. CCPR/C/NZL/CO/6. [Online]. Available http://undocs.org/CCPR/C/NZL/6. Accessed March 2, 2018.

  • Walker, R. (1990). Ka Whawhai Tonu Mātou. Auckland: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Stanley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stanley, E., Mihaere, R. (2018). Challenging Māori Imprisonment and Human Rights Ritualism. In: Stanley, E. (eds) Human Rights and Incarceration. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95399-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95398-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95399-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics