Climate Change Impacts on the Genetics of Post-Fire Regeneration and Reproductive Phenology

  • Filippos A. AravanopoulosEmail author
  • Paraskevi G. Alizoti
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 65)


Evidence regarding fast climatic change is constantly accumulating and has been linked to an ongoing increase of fire occurrence and reproductive phenology modifications, both being crucial factors in the evolution of forest tree populations. Studying the effects of forest fires in the gene pool, it was found that in basic genetic diversity parameters that reflect the magnitude of genetic variation in natural populations, no significant differences between post-fire and control populations were observed. Nevertheless, the genetic architecture of post-fire populations compared to control populations presented some differences in the frequencies of rare alleles, the occurrence of interspecific hybridization in the post-fire populations and the observation of genetic bottleneck effects, especially in isolated populations. Forest fires may not induce genetic erosion in forest tree populations per se however population isolation compounded by periods of high forest fire frequency and intensity, may lead to adverse consequences for the architecture of the genetic diversity of forest trees. Such consequences may be compounded by reduced natural regeneration due to the decreased percentage of sound seed, a result of the anticipated reduction of tree fertility and flowering synchronization, induced by climatic change.


Genetic diversity Molecular markers Forest fires Seed set 


  1. Alizoti, P. G., Kilimis, K., & Gallios, P. (2010). Temporal and spatial variation of flowering among Pinus nigra Arn. clones under changing climatic conditions. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 786–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aravanopoulos, F. A. (2009). Wild fires as a factor for the erosion of the forest gene pool: Towards a genetic holocaust? In Proceeding of 14th Pan-Hellenic forest science conference, Patras (pp. 851–863).Google Scholar
  3. Aravanopoulos, F. A., & Panetsos, K. P. (1998). Genetics and evolution of natural Pinus brutia Ten. populations in Lesvos island. Geotechnical Science Issues, 9, 10–19.Google Scholar
  4. Aravanopoulos, F. A., Panetsos, K. P., & Scaltsoyiannes, Α. (2004). Genetic structure of Pinus brutia stands exposed to wild fires. Plant Ecology, 171, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baka, M., & Aravanopoulos, F. A. (2000). Molecular genetics of Pinus halepensis populations. In Proceeding of 8th Pan-Hellenic conference, Hellenic scientific society for plant genetics and breeding, Arta (pp. 419–426).Google Scholar
  6. Baka, M., & Aravanopoulos, F. A. (2002). Analysis of molecular genetic parameters in natural Pinus halepensis (Mill.) populations. In Proceeding of 9th Pan-Hellenic conference, Hellenic scientific society for plant genetics and breeding, Thermi (pp. 427–434).Google Scholar
  7. Baka, M., & Aravanopoulos, F. A. (2006). Molecular genetic analysis of Aleppo pine populations originating from areas of differential forest fire history: Implications for reforestations and breeding. In Proceeding of international conference of population genetics and genomics of forest trees, Madrid (p. 112). Google Scholar
  8. Bariteau, M., Alptekin, U., Aravanopoulos, F. A., et al. (2003). Les resources génétiques forestières dans le basin Méditerranéen. Fôret Méditerranéenne, 24, 148–158.Google Scholar
  9. Bernier, G., & Périlleux, C. (2005). A physiological overview of the genetics of flowering time control. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 3, 3–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Climent, J., Prada, M. A., Calama, R., Chambel, M. R., Sánchez de Ron, D., & Alia, R. (2008). To grow or to seed: Ecotypic variation in reproductive allocation and cone production by young female Aleppo Pine (Pinus halepensis, Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany, 95(7), 833–842.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dimitrakopoulos, Α. (2004). Classification of Prefectures in Greece based on forest fire frequency and total burnt area during the period 1983–1997. Science Annual Facility Forestry & Natural Environment. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 40, 215–226.Google Scholar
  12. Dobzhansky, T. (1970). Genetics of the evolutionary process. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. EEA. (2007). Europe’s environment. 4th Assessment. Copenhagen: EEA.Google Scholar
  14. England, P. R., Usher, A. V., Whelan, R. J., & Ayre, D. J. (2002). Microsatellite diversity and genetic structure of fragmented populations of the rare, fire-dependent shrub Grevillea macleayana. Molecular Ecology, 11, 967–977.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gollan, T., Schurr, U., & Schulze, E. D. (1992). Stomatal response to drying soil in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition of Helianthus annuus. I. The concentration of cations, anions, amino-acids, in and pH of, the xylem sap. Plant, Cell & Environment, 15, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomez, Α., Aravanopoulos, F. A., Alia, R., & Bueno, M. A. (1999). Pinus halepensis RAPD markers: Linkage and genetic diversity. In Proceeding of international congress ‘Applications of Biotechnology in Forest Trees’, Vitoria, Spain, September 22–25, 1999. 4 p.Google Scholar
  17. IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, et al. (Eds.), Climate change: The physical science basis, Fifth Assessment Report. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
  18. Krauss, S. L. (1997). Low genetic diversity in Persoonia mollis (Proteaceae), a fire-sensitive shrub occurring in a fire-prone habitat. Heredity, 78, 41–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ledig, F. T. (1992). Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos, 63, 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meagher, T. R. (1988). Sex determination in plants. In D. J. Lovett & D. L. Lovett (Eds.), Plant reproductive ecology: Pattern and strategies (pp. 125–138). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. NOAA – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (2018). NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, State of the Climate: Global climate report for annual 2017.
  22. Paliouris, G., Taylor, H. W., Wein, R. W., et al. (1995). Fire as an agent in redistributing fallout 137Cs in the Canadian boreal forest. Science Total Enviroment, 160/161, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Panetsos, K. P., Aravanopoulos, F. A., & Scaltsoyiannes, Α. (1998). Genetic variation of Pinus brutia in islands of the north eastern Aegean Sea. Silvae Genetica, 47, 115–120.Google Scholar
  24. Pereira, J. S., Chaves, M. M., Caldeira, M. C., & Correia, A. (2007). Water availability and productivity. In J. Morison & M. Morecroft (Eds.), Plant growth and climate change (pp. 119–145). London: Blackwell Publication.Google Scholar
  25. Perry, D. J., & Bousquet, J. (2001). Genetic diversity and mating system of post-fire and post-harvest black spruce: An investigation using codominant sequence-tagged-site (STS) markers. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Queitsch, C., Hong, S. W., Vierling, E., & Lindquist, S. (2000). Heat shock protein 101 plays a crucial role in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 12, 479–492.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Rajora, O. P., & Pluhar, S. A. (2003). Genetic diversity impacts of forest fires, forest harvesting, and alternative reforestation practices in black spruce (Picea mariana). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106, 1203–1212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rajora, O. P., & Rahman, M. H. (2002). EST and microsatellite DNA analysis of genetic effects of forest management practices and forest fires in black spruce (Picea mariana). In X proc. plant and animal genome conference San Diego, CA, January 12–16 (p. 209).Google Scholar
  29. Rajora, O. P., Mann, I. K., & Shi, Y. Z. (2005). Genetic diversity and population structure of boreal white spruce (Picea glauca) in pristine conifer-dominated and mixed wood forest stands. Canadian Journal of Botany, 83, 1096–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ray, P. D., Huang, B. W., & Tsuji, Y. (2012). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signalling. Cellular Signaling, 24, 981–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reznick, D., Nunney, L., & Tessier, A. (2000). Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogers, D. L. (2000). Genotypic diversity and clone size in old-growth populations of coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens). Canadian Journal of Botany, 78, 1408–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Romme, W. H., Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H., et al. (1997). A rare episode of sexual reproduction in aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) following the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Natural Areas Journal, 17, 17–25.Google Scholar
  34. Sherry, R. A., Zhou, X., Gu, S., Arnone, J. A., III, Johnson, D. W., Schimel, D. S., Verburg, P. S. J., Wallace, L. L., & Luo, Y. (2011). Changes in duration of reproductive phases and lagged phenological response to experimental warming. Plant Ecology and Diversity, 4(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uchiyama, K., Goto, S., Tsuda, Y., et al. (2006). Genetic diversity and genetic structure of adult and buried seed populations of Betula maximowicziana in mixed and post-fire stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 237, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filippos A. Aravanopoulos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paraskevi G. Alizoti
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations