Wild Fruit Tree Species of Montenegrin Forests

  • Milić ČurovićEmail author
  • Miodrag Jovančević
  • Jasmina Balijagić
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 65)


Wild fruit woody species without any doubt present an essential element of biodiversity of Montenegrin forests. The aim of this paper was to examine the geographical distribution of these species as a basic precondition for their monitoring and protection. According to the National Forest Inventory in Montenegro, there are seven wild fruit tree species present: chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.), Turkish hazelnut (Corylus colurna L.), walnut (Juglans regia L.), wild apple (Malus sylvestris Mill.), wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) and wild pears (Pyrus communys L. and Pyrus amigdaliformis Vill.). Seven analyzed species are spread over an area of 9498 ha which takes up 0,69% of the territory of Montenegro. Most common wild fruit tree species in Montenegro are wild pear, wild cherry and wild apple. The highest values of average timber dimensions show wild cherry, chestnut and Turkish hazelnut. Further analysis of the distribution according to the altitude shows which species are located mainly on terrains of lower altitude and which species spread mainly at altitudes above 800 m and how altitude influenced the diversity of these species. Distribution and main characteristics of Montenegrin wild fruit tree species shows potential for establishment of collecting site areas as first step of in situ conservation.


Wild fruit Forest Tree species Montenegro 


  1. Curovic, M., & Spalevic, V. (2010, March 9–10). Climate changes impacts on forests in Montenegro mitigation and adaptation. In International conference – Forest ecosystems and climate changes (pp. 283–287). Belgrade: IUFRO, EFI, Institute of Forestry Belgrade.Google Scholar
  2. Ducci, F., & Vannuccini M. (2006). Definition of provenance regions for chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and flowering ash (Fraxinus ornus L.) in Tuscany. In Bozzano, et al. (Eds.), Noble hardwoods network (pp. 43–51). Report of the sixth (9–11 June 2002, Alter do Chão, Portugal) and seventh meetings (22–24 April 2004, Arezzo, Italy).Google Scholar
  3. Ducci, F., Germani, A., Janin, G., Proietti, R., & Signorini, G. (2006). Clone selection for wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) with special reference to some traits used. In Bozzano, et al. (Eds.), Noble hardwoods network (pp. 53–61). Report of the sixth (9–11 June 2002, Alter do Chão, Portugal) and seventh meetings (22–24 April 2004, Arezzo, Italy).Google Scholar
  4. Eichhorn, M. P., Paris, P., Herzog, F., Incoll, L. D., Liagre, F., Mantzanas, K., Mayus, M., Moreno, G., Papanastasis, V. P., Pilbeam, D. J., Pisanelli, A., & Dupraz, C. (2006). Silvoarable systems in Europe – Past, present and future prospects. Agroforestry Systems, 67, 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fernández-Martínez, M., Vicca, S., Janssens, I. A., Espelta, J. M., & Peñuelas, J. (2017). The role of nutrients, productivity and climate in determining tree fruit production in European forests. New Phytologist, 213(2), 669–679, 11p. Scholar
  6. Gixhari, B., Dias, S., Hodaj, B., Ismaili, H., & Vrapi, H. (2014). Geo-information analysis of fruit trees species in Albania. Agriculture & Forestry, 60(1), 63–74.Google Scholar
  7. Huntley, B., & Birks, H. J. B. (1983). An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe: 0–13000 years ago (pp. 238–242). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Jolivet, C., Höltken, A. M., Liesebach, H., Steiner, W., & Degen, B. (2011). Spatial genetic structure in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.): I. variation among natural populations of different density. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 7(2), 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jovančević, M., & Vujanić-Varga, D. (1997). Karakteristike populacije Pyrus sp. u području Bijelog Polja. Contemporary Agriculture, Novi Sad, 3–4, 101–108.Google Scholar
  10. Jovančević, M., & Balijagic, J. (2009). Characteristics of walnut population (Juglans regia L.) in the area of Andrijevica, Berane, Bijelo Polje and Rozaje. Contemporary Agriculture, 58(3–4), 129–135.Google Scholar
  11. Jovančević, M., Šebek, G., & Balijagić, J. (1999). Biological gharacteristic of pear (Pyrus comuunis L. ) in dependence of the height above the sea level. Contemporary Agriculture, 48, 5–6 str 75–78. Novi Sad.Google Scholar
  12. Kleinschmit, J., Stephan, B. R., Liesebach, M., Schiite, G., & Steinhoff, S. (1996, March 24–27). Noble hardwood species in Germany: Occurrence and gene conservation measures. In Turok, et al. (Eds.), Noble hardwoods network. Report of the first meeting, Escherode, Germany (pp. 101–111).Google Scholar
  13. Kobliha, J. (2002). Wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) breeding program aimed at the use of this tree in the Czech forestry. Journal of Forest Science, 48(5), 202–218.Google Scholar
  14. Korać, M., Cerović, S., Gološin, B., & Miletić R. (1990) Population variability of domestic Walnut and selection results. Jugoslovensko Voćarstvo, Čačak, 94, 3–10.Google Scholar
  15. Lazarevic, J. (2012). Genetic resources in the forestry sector of Montenegro. Agriculture & Forestry, 57(1), 51–71.Google Scholar
  16. MARD (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Montenegro). (2013). The first national forest inventory of Montenegro (pp. 1–347). Podgorica.Google Scholar
  17. Miranda, R. A. (1996, March 24–27). Noble hardwoods in Spain: Conservation of genetic resources. In Turok, et al. (Eds.), Noble hardwoods network. Report of the first meeting, Escherode, Germany (pp. 23–25).Google Scholar
  18. Odalovic, A., Prenkic, R., Dubak, D., Jovancevic, M., Cizmovic, M., & Radunovic, M. (2013). Effect of ecological conditions on expression of biopomological characteristics of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in natural populations of Montenegro. Genetika, 45(1), 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Orlovic, S., Matovic, N., & Pilipovic, A. (2006). Noble hardwoods in Serbia and Montenegro. In Bozzano, et al. (Eds.), Noble Hardwoods Network. Report of the sixth (9–11 June 2002, Alter do Chão, Portugal) and seventh meetings (22–24 April 2004, Arezzo, Italy) (pp. 21–24).Google Scholar
  20. Šebek, G. (2013). Morphological characteristics of fruits of selected types of wild apples (Malus silvestris L.) in the area of Bijelo Polje. Agriculture & Forestry, 59(2), 167–173.Google Scholar
  21. Šijačić-Nikolić, M., & Milovanović, J. (2007). Conservation and sustainable use of forest genetic resources. Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry, Belgrade, 95, 7–21.Google Scholar
  22. Villani, F., Eriksson, G., Bucci, G., Aravanoupoulos, P., Botta, R., Diamandis, S., Fernandez Lopez, J., Garrod, G., Robin, C., Romane, F., Russell, K., Vannini, A., Akkak, A., Alizoti, E., Barreneche, T., Blanco Silva, R., Buck, E., Casasoli, M., Cherubini, M., Drouzas, A., Grandjanny, M., Grossman, A., Kremer, A., Lauteri, M., Marinoni, D., Mattioni, C., Mavrogiannis, M., Monteverdi, C., Perlerou, H., Pliura, A., Sansotta, A., Scarpa, R., Spalato, F., Vettraino, A., & Zas, R. (2006). Complexity of gene resources conservation and utilisation of a differently managed multipurpose tree species (Castanea sativa Mill.): what, where and how to conserve. Advances in Horticultural Science, 20(1, Special issue on Chesnut (2006)), 117–129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Milić Čurović
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miodrag Jovančević
    • 1
  • Jasmina Balijagić
    • 1
  1. 1.Biotechnical FacultyUniversity of MontenegroPodgoricaMontenegro

Personalised recommendations