Skip to main content

Friedman and Hayek’s Converging Ideas on Freedom and the State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hayek: A Collaborative Biography

Part of the book series: Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics ((AIEE))

Abstract

The concept of freedom is one of the central issues in philosophy and politics. In the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, the concept that prevailed in the mainstream was largely defined according to the principles of the ‘free’ market economy. This chapter focuses on the concept of freedom as formulated by Friedrich von Hayek and Milton Friedman, which was largely derived from the neoclassical economic approach. The key component of their respective concepts of freedom was labelled negative freedom (or ‘freedom from’) by Sir Isaiah Berlin in his Four Essays on Liberty. While defended a limited state role in securing freedom and the private spheres of individuals, Hayek did not condemn the human rights abuses or coercive practices carried out during General Pinochet brutal dictatorship. Both Friedman and Hayek formulated conceptions of freedom that primarily revolve around the concepts of economic freedom and negative freedom. Advocates of positive freedom viewed distributive justice as an important concept in creating the conditions required for positive freedom. The respective ideas of freedom formulated by Friedman and Hayek only attained the level of abstract freedom—a minimalist form. Their advocacy of applying the ‘free’ market economic approach to different branches of social and political life has produced many catastrophic outcomes, including the exploitation of natural resources and human beings, the degradation and pollution of the environment, economic crises and war. The period that witnessed the most significant application of the ideas of ‘free’ market capitalism in the concept of freedom represents a regression in the development of self-understanding and self-realization. Friedman and Hayek’s ideas pertaining to freedom should, therefore, be discarded from political, economic, social and philosophical discourse and debates, because this minimal form of freedom promotes freedom for modern elites while delivering unfreedom for the rest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Backhouse, R. E. (2006). Hayek on Money and the Business Cycle. In E. Feser (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hayek (pp. 34–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, N. P. (1994). The Road to Freedom: Hayek’s Social and Economic Philosophy. In J. Birner and R. Van Zijp (Eds.), Hayek, Co-ordination and Evolution: His Legacy in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas (pp. 141–163). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1969). Four Essays on Liberty. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (2006). Hayek and Market Socialism. In E. Feser (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hayek (pp. 51–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (2004). Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B., & Montes, L. (2014a, August). Friedrich Hayek and His Visits to Chile (CHOPE Working Paper No. 2014-12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B., & Montes, L. (2014b, September 26). Friedrich Hayek and His Visits to Chile. Review of Austrian Economics. First Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B., & Montes, L. (2015). Friedrich Hayek and His Visits to Chile. Review of Austrian Economics, 28(3), 261–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenstein, A. O. (2003). Friedrich Hayek: A Biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1990). The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory. In J. Elster & A. Hylland (Eds.), Foundation of Social Choice Theory (pp. 102–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrant, A., McPhail, E., & Berger, S. (2012). Preventing the “Abuses” of Democracy: Hayek, the “Military Usurper” and Transitional Dictatorship in Chile? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 71(3), 513–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feser, E. (2006). The Cambridge Companion to Hayek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, K. (2009). The Influence of Neoliberals Before During and After Pinochet. In P. Mirowski & D. Plehwe (Eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. F. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. F. (1981a). Market Mechanism and Central Economic Planning. Washington, DC: The American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. F. (1981b). The Invisible Hands of Economics and Politics. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. F., & Friedman, R. D. (1980). Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. F., & Friedman, R. D. (1998). Two Lucky People: Memoirs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1984). On Negative and Positive Liberty. In Z. Pelczynski & J. Gray (Eds.), Conception of Liberty in Political Philosophy (pp. 321–348). London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacohen, M. H. (2000). Karl Popper: The Formative Years, 1902–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1948). Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1967). Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge and K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1979). Law, Legislation and Liberty, Volume 3: The Political Order of a Free People. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1989). Hayek on Hayek. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1991). Economic Freedom. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1994). The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (2007). The Road to Serfdom Texts and Documents the Definitive Edition (B. Caldwell, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (2011). The Constitution of Liberty: The Definitive Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, C. M. (1984). A Philosophy of Individual Freedom: The Political Thought of F. A. Hayek. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. (2010). Hayek’s The Constitution of Liberty: An Account of Its Argument. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, P. (2009). The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Marketing of The Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1951 [1932]). Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis (J. Kahane, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. H. (2014). Economics as Religion: From Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research. (1984). Politics and Tyranny: Lessons in Pursuit of Freedom by Milton Friedman. San Francisco, CA: Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. J. (1999). Revoking the Moral Order: The Ideology of Positivism and the Vienna Circle. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (1996). Freedom as Antipower. Ethics, 106(3), 576–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant, R. (1994). Hayek on Social Justice: A Critique. In J. Birner & R. Van Zijp (Eds.), Hayek, Co-ordination and Evolution: His Legacy in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas (pp. 164–177). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranelagh, J. (1991). Thatcher’s People. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayack, E. (1987). Not So Free to Choose: The Political Economy of Milton Friedman and Ronald Reagan. New York: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, C. (2013). Nietzsche’s Marginal Children: On Friedrich Hayek: How Did the Conservative Ideas of Friedrich Hayek and the Austrian School Become Our Economic Reality? By Turning the Market into the Realm of Great Politics and Morals. The Nation, 27 May. http://www.thenation.com/article/174219/nietzsches-marginal-children-friedrich-hayek#ixzz2ZTvhL6s7.

  • Robin, C. (2015). Wealth and the Intellectuals: Nietzsche, Hayek, and the Austrian School of Economics. In R. Leeson (Ed.), Hayek: A Collaborative Biography: Part V Hayek’s Great Society of Free Men. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoble, A. J. (2006). Hayek the Philosopher of Law. In E. Feser (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hayek (pp. 171–181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty. In Philosophical Papers (pp. 211–229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173490.009.

  • Tribe, K. (2009). Liberalism and Neoliberalism in Britain. In P. Mirowski & D. Plehwe (Eds.), The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Marketing of The Neoliberal Thought Collective (pp. 68–97). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Overtveldt, J. (2007). The Chicago School: How the University of Chicago Assembled the Thinkers who Revolutionized Economics and Business. Chicago: Agate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birsen Filip .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Filip, B. (2018). Friedman and Hayek’s Converging Ideas on Freedom and the State. In: Leeson, R. (eds) Hayek: A Collaborative Biography. Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95219-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95219-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95218-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95219-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics