The extensive literature on talent management is relatively silent when it comes to understanding power relations, and this chapter explores power dynamics in elitist talent programme. The argument draws heavily on Norbert Elias’s ideas of figurations and his analysis of Court Society which are coupled with Robert van Krieken’s recent analysis of celebrity society. After considering how power manifests in human resource development (HRD), the chapter unfolds connections between ancient court behaviour and contemporary organization. Behaviour in elite talent pools is likely to be self-regulating in ways that suit both ambitious individuals and senior managers. The analysis suggests that elite talent pools act in ways that paralyse rebellion from within by pitting ambitious individuals against each other.
- Celebrity society
- Talent management
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Habitus can be thought of as the embodied habits and manners of social structures, a psychological disposition.
Adamsen, B. (2016). Demystifying talent management: A critical approach to the realities of talent. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Al Ariss, A. (Ed.). (2014). Global talent management. London: Springer.
Collings, D. G., Mellahi, K., & Cascio, W. F. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of talent management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
De Broek, G., Meyers, M. C., & Dries, N. (2018). Employee reactions to talent management: Assumptions versus evidence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, 199–213.
de Swaan, A. (1990). The management of normality. London: Routledge.
Dolan, P., & Connolly, J. (Eds.). (2017). The social organization of marketing: A figurational approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Elias, N. (1983). The court society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Elias, N. (2000). On the process of civilization (The collected works of Norbert Elias). Dublin, Ireland: University College Dublin Press.
Elias, N. (2012) . On the process of civilization. Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Dublin, Ireland: University College Dublin Press.
Faulconbridge, J. R., Beaverstock, J. V., Hall, S., & Hewitson, A. (2009). The ‘war for talent’: The gatekeeper role of executive search firms in elite labour markets. Geoforum, 40, 800–808.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
Graffin, S. D., Wade, J., Porac, J., & McNamee, R. (2008). The impact of CEO status diffusion on the economic outcomes of other senior managers. Organization Science, 19(3), 457–474.
Groysberg, B. (2012). Chasing stars. The myth of talent and the portability of performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kamoche, K. (2000). Developing managers: The functional, the symbolic, the sacred and the profane. Organization Studies, 21(4), 747–777.
Kim, H., & Cervero, R. M. (2007). How power relations structure the evaluation process for HRD programmes. Human Resource Development International, 10(1), 5–20.
Lanham, R. A. (2006). The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lever, J. (2011). Urban regeneration partnerships: A figurational critique of governmentality theory. Sociology, 45(1), 86–101.
Lever, J. B., & Swailes, S. (2017). Ballet for the sun king: Power, talent and organization. In P. Dolan & J. Connolly (Eds.), The social organization of marketing: A figurational approach (pp. 143–169). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mabey, C., & Finch-Lees, T. (2010). Management and learning development. In A. Wilkinson, N. Bacon, T. Redman, & S. Snell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of human resource management (pp. 173–190). London: SAGE.
Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II. Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. Isis, 79, 606–628.
Meyers, M. C., De Boeck, G., & Dries, N. (2017). Talent or not: Employee reactions to talent designations. In D. G. Collings, K. Mellahi, & W. F. Cascio (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of talent management (pp. 169–192). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Newton, T., & Smith, D. (2002). Norbert Elias and the civilised organization. In A. van Iterson, M. Mastenbroek, T. Newton, & D. Smith (Eds.), The civilized organization: Norbert Elias and the future of organization studies (pp. vi–xxxviii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Ross, S. (2013). Talent derailment: A multi-dimensional perspective for understanding talent. Industrial & Commercial Training, 45(1), 12–17.
Ross, S. (2018). Is having talent enough? How leadership talent enacts success and why some leaders derail (PhD thesis). Nottingham Trent University.
Smith, D. (2002). The humiliating organization. The functions and dysfunctions of degradation. In A. van Iterson, W. Mastenbroek, T. Newton, & D. Smith (Eds.), The civilized organization. Norbert Elias and the future of organization studies (pp. 41–57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sofer, S. (2013). The courtiers of civilization: A study of diplomacy. Albany, NY: State University New York Press.
Sparrow, P., Scullion, H., & Tarique, I. (Eds.). (2014a). Strategic talent management: Contemporary issues in international context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sparrow, P., Scullion, H., & Tarique, I. (2014b). Multiple lenses on talent management: Definitions and contours of the field. In P. Sparrow, H. Scullion, & I. Tarique (Eds.), Strategic talent management: Contemporary issues in international context (pp. 36–69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stahl, M. J. (1983). Achievement, power and managerial motivation: Selecting managerial talent with the job choice exercise. Personnel Psychology, 36(4), 775–789.
Stewart, R. (1984). The nature of management? A problem for management education. Journal of Management Studies, 21(3), 323–330.
Swailes, S. (2013). The ethics of talent management. Business Ethics: A European Review, 22(1), 32–46.
Townley, B. (2005). Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. In C. Grey & H. Willmott (Eds.), Critical management studies: A reader (pp. 304–323). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Trehan, K., & Rigg, C. (2011). Theorising critical HRD: A paradox of intricacy and discrepancy. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(3), 276–290.
van den Brink, M., Fruytier, B., & Thunnissen, M. (2013). Talent management in academia: Performance systems and HRM policies. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(2), 180–195.
van Iterson, A., Mastenbroek, M., Newton, T., & Smith, D. (Eds.). (2002). The civilized organization: Norbert Elias and the future of organization studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
van Krieken, R. (1990). The organization and the soul: Elias and Foucault on discipline and the self. Archives Europeenes de Sociologie, 31(2), 350–371.
van Krieken, R. (1998). Norbert Elias (Key sociologists series). London/New York: Routledge.
van Krieken, R. (2006). The ethics of corporate legal personality. In S. R. Clegg & C. Rhodes (Eds.), Management ethics: Contemporary contexts (pp. 77–96). London: Routledge.
van Krieken, R. (2012). Celebrity society. London: Routledge.
Vince, R. (2014). What do HRD scholars and practitioners need to know about power, emotion and HRD? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(4), 409–420.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society (Vol. 1 and 2). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Weber, M. (1989). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Unwin-Hyman.
Willmott, H. (1987). Studying managerial work: A critique and a proposal. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 249–270.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lever, J., Swailes, S. (2019). Paralysing Rebellion: Figurations, Celebrity, and Power in Elite Talent Management. In: Adamsen, B., Swailes, S. (eds) Managing Talent. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95201-7_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-95200-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-95201-7