Disrespectful Technologies: Social Norm Conflicts in Digital Worlds

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 794)


Social norms are the informal understandings that govern the behavior within a society and are crucial for the feeling of togetherness and social cohesion. However, technology-mediated behavior often stands in conflict (e.g., parallel smartphone use undermining the norm of full attention for the conversation partner). Under the umbrella term ‘disrespectful technologies’, the present research discusses potential conflicts between technology use and social norms. We present four general types of frequent social norm conflicts, illustrate these by examples from research in different fields of HCI and a user survey, and discuss possibilities to address these in design. Altogether, we see the integration of social norm considerations in the user centered design approach as a long-term goal in HCI, with important consequences on an individual and societal level.


Technology-mediated behavior Social interaction Social norms Social conflict Disrespectful technologies 



Part of this research has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), project Kommunikado (FKZ: 01IS15040D).


  1. 1.
    Turner, J.C.: Social Influence, vol. xvi. Thomson Brooks, Belmont (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Przybylski, A.K., Weinstein, N.: Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 30(3), 237–246 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Moncur, W., Orzech, K.M., Neville, F.G.: Fraping, social norms and online representations of self. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 125–131 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diefenbach, S., Christoforakos, L., Ullrich, D.: Digitale Disbalance - Herausforderungen der Smartphone-Ära. Wirtschaftspsychologie aktuell 17(3), 36–42 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sabra, J.B.: “I Hate When They Do That!” Netiquette in mourning and memorialization among Danish Facebook users. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 61(1), 24–40 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lofland, L.H.: The social shaping of emotion: the case of grief. Symb. Interact. 8, 171–190 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Voggeser, B.J., Singh, R.K., Göritz, A.S.: Self-control in online discussions: disinhibited online behavior as a failure to recognize social cues. Front. Psychol. 8, 2372 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, M.K., Takayama, L.: Now, i have a body: uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 33–42. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Preece, J.: Etiquette online: from nice to necessary. Commun. ACM 47(4), 56–61 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ars Technica Open Forum: How do you address someone in your reply to their emails?
  13. 13.
    Hassenzahl, M.: Experience design: technology for all the right reasons. Synth. Lect. Hum. Cent. Inform. 3(1), 1–95 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J.B., Jackson, D.D.: Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. WW Norton & Company, New York (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLudwig-Maximilians UniversityMunichGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Media InformaticsLudwig-Maximilians UniversityMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations