Advertisement

An Investigation of Key Factors Influencing Aircraft Comfort Experience

  • Wenhua LiEmail author
  • Jianjie Chu
  • Bingchen Gou
  • Hui Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 794)

Abstract

Comfort has been an increasingly important issue in air travel. Passenger comfort is clearly a key variable in research on user acceptance of transportation systems, and it is related to passenger’s satisfaction and the willingness to fly again. After realizing its importance in capturing and retaining customers, a growing number of airlines are focusing on comfort. How to improve the experience of passenger comfort has become a major strategic goal for the airline management. This paper regards the passenger comfort in the aircraft cabin during the flight as an experience shaped by interaction between individual and the flight contextual situation. The aim of this study is prioritizing the factors affecting the passenger comfort experience, and sorts these factors into different categories. Firstly, the paper undertakes a systematic literature review to distinguish key critical factors affecting the aircraft passenger comfort, then classifies the factors into five categories by Kano model. At last, the managerial implication is given based on the result. The findings of this research provide important implications for the designers and airline managers and help them better understand the passenger comfort experience. The result can be used as a reference of symmetrically designing the aircraft interior and reasonably allocating the human and material resource.

Keywords

Comfort Air travel Passenger experience Kano 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express special thanks to the participating passengers for their time and efforts. The authors would like to acknowledge support for this work from civil aircraft special scientific research program, China (Grant No. MJ-2015-F-018). The study is partly supported by the 111 Project, Grant No. B13044.

References

  1. 1.
    Richards, L.G.: On the psychology of passenger comfort. In: Oborne, D.J., Levis, J.A. (eds.) Human Factors in Transport Research, vol. 2, pp. 15–23. Academic Press, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Slater, K.: Human Comfort. CC Thomas, Springfield (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Looze, M.P., Kuijt-Evers, L.F.M., Van Dieën, J.: Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics 46, 985–997 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, L., Helander, M.G., Drury, C.G.: Identifying factors of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Hum. Factors 38, 377–389 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vink, P., Overbeeke, C.J., Desmet, P.M.A.: Comfort Experience. In: Vink, P. (ed.) Comfort and Design - Principles and Good Practice, pp. 1–12. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luttmann, A., Schmidt, K.-H., Jäger, M.: Working conditions, muscular activity and complaints of office workers. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 40, 549–559 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moes, N.C.C.M.: Analysis of sitting discomfort, A review. In: Bust, P.D., McCabe, P.T. (eds.) Contemporary Ergonomics 2005, pp. 200–204. Taylor & Francis, London (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vink, P., Hallbeck, S.: Editorial: Comfort and discomfort studies demonstrate the need for a new model. Appl. Ergon. 43, 271–276 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Da Silva, L., Bortolotti, S.L.V., Campos, I.C.M., Merino, E.A.D.: Comfort model for automobile seat. Work 41, 295–302 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kolich, M.: A conceptual framework proposed to formalize the scientific investigation of automobile seat comfort. Appl. Ergon. 39, 15–27 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patel, H., D’Cruz, M.: Passenger-centric factors influencing the experience of aircraft comfort. Transp. Rev. 38, 252–269 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, J., Yu, S., Chu, J., Gou, B.: Identifying and analyzing critical factors impacting on passenger comfort employing a hybrid model. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. 27, 289–305 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahmadpour, N., Robert, J.M., Pownall, B.: The dynamics of passenger comfort experience understanding the relationship between passenger and the aircraft cabin interior. In: The International Conference of Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute, CASI Aero, Toronto, pp. 1–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, W., Yu, S., Pei, H., Zhao, C., Tian, B.: A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality. J. Air Transp. Manag. 60, 49–64 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vink, P., Bazley, C., Kamp, I., Blok, M.: Possibilities to improve the aircraft interior comfort experience. Appl. Ergon. 43, 354–359 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vink, P., Van Mastrigt, S.: The aircraft interior comfort experience of 10,032 passengers. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, pp. 579–583 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenhua Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jianjie Chu
    • 1
  • Bingchen Gou
    • 1
  • Hui Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Shaanxi Engineering Laboratory for Industrial DesignNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations