Abstract
Uterine and penile transplantation are emerging as the latest forms of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) and may help meet the needs of individuals struggling with devastating infertility and genitourinary deficits. The conditions leading to absolute uterine infertility and penile amputation have profound implications for the patient’s sense of identity, body image, quality of life, and capacity for intimacy. Although the worldwide experience with these forms of VCA is limited, encouraging outcomes in several cases have been noted. The optimal psychosocial assessment of these patients is likely to contain elements similar to solid organ and other VCA patient evaluations with modifications relevant to fertility, donor, and partner factors involved. Ethical considerations related to exposing a fetus to immunosuppressive medications, risk of graft loss, and the plan to remove the graft after child birth for uterine transplantation are all areas of active discussion in VCA and transplant ethics communities. This chapter will review the reproductive VCA experience and discuss the psychosocial assessment for these patients.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
https://www.unos.org/transplantation/history. Available from: https://www.unos.org/transplantation/history.
Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H, Kvarnström N, Mölne J, Dahm-Kähler P, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385(9968):607–16.
Diaz-Garcia C, Akhi S, Wallin A, Pellicer A, Brannstrom M. First report on fertility after allogenic uterus transplantation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1491–4.
Fegeeh W, Raffa H, Jabbad H, Marzouki A. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;76(3):245–51.
Erman Akar M, Ozkan O, Aydinuraz B, Dirican K, Cincik M, Mendilcioglu I, et al. Clinical pregnancy after uterus transplantation. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1358–63.
Brännström M, Johannesson L, Dahm-Kähler P, Enskog A, Mölne J, Kvarnström N, et al. First clinical uterus transplantation trial: a six-month report. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1228–36.
Milliez J. Uterine transplantation FIGO committee for the ethical aspects of human reproduction and women’s health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106(3):270.
Arian SE, Flyckt RL, Farrell RM, Falcone T, Tzakis AG. Characterizing women with interest in uterine transplant clinical trials in the United States: who seeks information on this experimental treatment? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(2):190–1.
Johannesson L, Wallis K, Koon EC, McKenna GJ, Anthony T, Leffingwell SG, et al. Living uterus donation and transplantation: experience of interest and screening in a single center in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(3):331e1–7.
Rodrigue JR, Tomich D, Fleishman A, Glazier AK. Vascularized composite allograft donation and transplantation: a survey of public attitudes in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(10):2687–95.
Saso S, Clarke A, Bracewell-Milnes T, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Thum MY, et al. Survey of perceptions of health care professionals in the United Kingdom toward uterine transplant. Prog Transplant. 2015;25(1):56–63.
Wennberg AL, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Milsom I, Brannstrom M. Attitudes towards new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: a survey in women 30-39 years of age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(1):38–44.
Olbrisch M, Levenson J, Hamer R. The PACT: a rating scale for the study of clinic decision-making in psychosocial screening of organ transplant candidates. Clin Transpl. 1989;3:164–9.
Futterman A, Wellisch D, Bond G, Carr C. The psychosocial levels system. A new rating scale to identify and assess emotional difficulties during bone marrow transplantation. Psychosomatics. 1991;32(2):177–86.
Twillman R, Manetto C, Wellisch D, Wolcott D. The transplant evaluation rating scale. A revision of the psychosocial levels system for evaluating organ transplant candidates. Psychosomatics. 1993;34(2):144–53.
Maldonado J, Dubois H, David E, Sher Y, Lolak S, Dyal J, et al. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT): a new tool for the psychosocial evaluation of pre-transplant candidates. Psychosomatics. 2012;53(2):123–32.
Goetzmann L, Ruegg L, Stamm M, Ambühl P, Boehler A, Halter J, et al. Psychosocial profiles after transplantation: a 24-month follow-up of heart, lung, liver, kidney and allogeneic bone-marrow patients. Transplantation. 2008;86(5):662–8.
Owen J, Bonds C, Wellisch D. Psychiatric evaluations of heart transplant candidates: predicting post-transplant hospitalizations, rejection episodes, and survival. Psychosomatics. 2006;47(3):213–22.
Shapiro P, Williams D, Foray A, Gelman I, Wukich N, Sciacca R. Psychosocial evaluation and prediction of compliance problems and morbidity after heart transplantation. Transplantation. 1995;60(12):1462–6.
Iacoviello B, Shenoy A, Braoude J, Jennings T, Vaidya S, Brouwer J, et al. The live donor assessment tool: a psychosocial assessment tool for live organ donors. Psychosomatics. 2015;56(3):254–61.
Johannesson L, Jarvholm S. Uterus transplantation: current progress and future prospects. Int J Womens Health. 2016;8:43–51.
Hitschfeld M, Schneekloth T, Kennedy C, Rummans T, Niazi S, Vasquez A, et al. The psychosocial assessment of candidates for transplantation: a cohort study of its association with survival among lung transplant recipients. Psychosomatics. 2016;57(5):489–97.
Jowsey-Gregoire S, Kumnig M. Standardizing psychosocial assessment for vascularized composite allotransplantation. 2016;21(5). Available from: www.co-transplantation.com
Järvholm S, Johannesson L, Clarke A, Brännström M. Uterus transplantation trial: psychological evaluation of recipients and partners during the post-transplantation year. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(4):1010–5.
Ejzenberg D, Mendes L, Haddad L, Baracat E, D’Albuquerque L, Andraus W. Uterine transplantation: a systematic review. Clinics. 2016;71(11):679–83.
Blume C, Pischke S, von Versen-Hoynck F, Gunter HH, Gross MM. Pregnancies in liver and kidney transplant recipients: a review of the current literature and recommendation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(8):1123–36.
Lavoue V, Vigneau C, Duros S, Boudjema K, Leveque J, Piver P, et al. Which donor for uterus transplants: brain-dead donor or living donor? A systematic review. Transplantation. 2017;101(2):267–73.
Kvarnström N, Järvholm S, Johannesson L, Dahm-Kähler P, Olausson M, Brännström M. Live donors of the initial observational study of uterus transplantation—psychological and medical follow-up until 1 year after surgery in the 9 cases. Transplantation. 2017;101(3):664–70.
Petrini C, Gainotti S, Morresi A, Costa A. Ethical issues in uterine transplantation: psychological implications and informed consent. Transplant Proc. 2017;49:707–10.
Api M, Boza A, Ceyhan M. Could the female-to-male transgender population be donor candidates for uterus transplantation? Turkish J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;14(4):233–7.
Schol I, Ko D, Cetrulo CJ. Genitourinary vascularized composite allotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2017;22(5):484–9. Epub ahead of print
Cetrulo CL Jr, Li K, Salinas HM, Treiser MD, Schol I, Barrisford GW, et al. Penis transplantation: first US experience. Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):983–8.
Grady D. ‘Whole again’: A vet maimed by an I.E.D. receives a transplanted penis. New York Times [serial on the Internet]. 2018 Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/23/health/soldier-penis-transplant-ied.html
Lucas PA, Page PR, Phillip RD, Bennett AN. The impact of genital trauma on wounded servicemen: qualitative study. Injury. 2014;45(5):825–9.
van der Merwe A, Graewe F, Zuhlke A, Barsdorf NW, Zarrabi AD, Viljoen JT, et al. Penile allotransplantation for penis amputation following ritual circumcision: a case report with 24 months of follow-up. Lancet. 2017;390(10099):1038–47.
Caplan A, Kimberly L, Parent B, Sosin M, Rodriguez E. The ethics of penile transplantation: preliminary recommendations. Transplantation. 2017;101:1200–5.
Rasper A, Terlecki R. Ushering in the era of penile transplantation. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(2):216–21.
Kumnig M, Jowsey-Gregoire S. Key psychosocial challenges in vascularized composite allotransplantation. World J Transplant. 2016;6(1):91–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ament, A., Jowsey-Gregoire, S.G. (2019). Psychological and Psychosocial Aspects of Uterine and Penile Transplantation. In: Sher, Y., Maldonado, J. (eds) Psychosocial Care of End-Stage Organ Disease and Transplant Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94914-7_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94914-7_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94913-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94914-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)