Advertisement

Deployment of Automated Trucking: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Johan Engström
  • Richard Bishop
  • Steven E. Shladover
  • Michael C. Murphy
  • Laurence O’Rourke
  • Tom Voege
  • Bob Denaro
  • Richard Demato
  • Divya Demato
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mobility book series (LNMOB)

Abstract

Based on the outcomes from the automated trucking breakout session at the 2017 Automated Vehicles Symposium, this Chapter reviews the current state-of-the-art of automated trucking applications and discusses key factors expected to influence their deployment. It is suggested that a key challenge for the deployment of automation in the trucking domain is that the business models are typically linked to specific and strongly heterogeneous transport operations, each of which associated with a specific set of deployment factors. To handle this complexity, strategic partnerships are expected to be formed between stakeholders, where business models and other deployment factors can be addressed jointly, and in a step-wise fashion, for specific automated trucking operations.

Keywords

Trucking Automation State-of-the-art Deployment Platooning Highway automation Business models Safety assurance regulation Public acceptance and trust Automation impacts on labor 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the panelists at 2017 AVS trucking breakout session, Bill Kahn (Peterbilt), Andrew Pilkington (Bendix), Steve Boyd (Peloton), Osman Altan (FHWA), Max Fuller (US Xpress), John Schroer (Tennessee DOT), Richard Makowski (Ohio DOT), Charlie Collins (Rep., Arkansas), Franklin Josey (Volvo), Alden Woodrow (Uber ATG), Kelly Regal (FMCSA), Greg Larson (Caltrans) and Bryan Jones (Martin Brower), as well as the audience for the lively discussions that were a key input to the present Chapter.

We also thank Byron Stanley (MIT Lincoln Laboratory), David Cist and Babak Memarzadeh (Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc.) for organizing a very interesting second deep dive on Localizing Ground Penetrating Radar for Robust Autonomous Lane-Keeping. However, since this session addressed enabling technology rather than deployment, it was not covered in the present Chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Fritz H, Bonnet C, Schiemenz H, Seeberger D (2004) Electronic tow-bar based platoon control of heavy duty trucks using vehicle—vehicle communication: practical results of the CHAUFFEUR2 project. ITS World Congress, Nagoya, Oct 2004Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonnet C, Fritz H (2000) Fuel consumption reduction in a platoon: experimental results with two electronically coupled trucks at close spacing. SAE Paper 2013-01-0767, 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McAuliffe BR, Lammert M, Lu X-Y, Shladover SE, Surcel M, Kailas A (2018) Influences on energy savings of heavy trucks using cooperative adaptive cruise control. SAE Paper 18AE-0271, SAE Congress, Detroit, MI, Apr 2018Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McAuliffe BR, Ahmadi-Baloutaki M, Croken M, Raeesi A (2017) Fuel-economy testing of a three-vehicle truck platooning system. NRC Report LTR-AL-2017-0008, National Research Council CanadaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu S-Y, Shladover SE (2017) Integrated ACC and CACC development for heavy-duty truck partial automation. In: American control conference, Seattle, WA, June 2017Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nowakowski C, Thompson D, Shladover SE, Kailas A, Lu X-Y (2016) Operational concepts for truck maneuvers with cooperative adaptive cruise control. Transportation Research Record No. 2559, pp 57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bevly D, Murray C, Lim A, Turochy R, Sesek R, Smith S, Humphreys L, Apperson G, Woodruff J, Gao S, Gordon M, Smith N, Watts A, Batterson J, Bishop R, Murray D, Torrey F, Korn A, Switkes J, Boyd S (2016) Heavy truck cooperative adaptive cruise control: evaluation, testing, and stakeholder engagement for near term deployment: phase one final report. Federal Highway Administration, Report, 2016Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bevly D, Murray C, Lim A, Turochy R, Sesek R, Smith S, Humphreys L, Apperson G, Woodruff J, Gao S, Gordon M, Smith N, Praharaj S, Batterson J, Bishop R, Murray D, Korn A, Switkes J, Boyd S, Kahn B (2017) Heavy truck cooperative adaptive cruise control: evaluation, testing, and stakeholder engagement for near term deployment: phase two final report. Federal Highway AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    www.eutruckplatooning.com. Accessed 2 Jan 2018
  10. 10.
    SAE (2016) J3016: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Society of Automotive EngineersGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Tsugawa S (2014) Results and issues of an automated truck platoon within the Energy ITS Project. In: 2014 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), June 8–11, Dearborn, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Fitzpatrick D, Cordahi G, O’Rourke L, Ross C, Kumar A, Bevly D (2016) Challenges to CV and AV applications in truck freight operations. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee JD, Wickens CD, Liu Y, Boyle LN (2017) Designing for people: an introduction to human factors engineering, 3rd edn. Createspace, Charleston, SCGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    International Transport Forum (ITF) (2017) Data-led governance of road freight transport—improving complianceGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    BLS (2017) Occupational employment statistics: May 2016 national occupational employment and wage estimates United States, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    International Transport Forum (ITF), Managing the Transition to Driverless Road Freight Transport, 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Engström
    • 1
  • Richard Bishop
    • 2
  • Steven E. Shladover
    • 3
  • Michael C. Murphy
    • 4
  • Laurence O’Rourke
    • 5
  • Tom Voege
    • 6
  • Bob Denaro
    • 7
  • Richard Demato
    • 8
  • Divya Demato
    • 8
  1. 1.Virginia Tech Transportation InstituteBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Bishop ConsultingHighlandUSA
  3. 3.University of California PATH ProgramRichmondUSA
  4. 4.Surface Mining and Technology Division, Caterpillar Inc.PeoriaUSA
  5. 5.ICFCambridgeUSA
  6. 6.International Transport Forum (ITF) of the OECDParisFrance
  7. 7.ITS Consultant and Motus VenturesGrand LakeUSA
  8. 8.GoodOpsNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations