Skip to main content

The Demographic Transition in the Nasa-Indigenous and Black Populations of Northern Cauca (Colombia)

Abstract

Northern Cauca in southwestern Colombia is a multi-ethnic-racial Andean region, inhabited by Indigenous (Nasa-Indigenous), Black and White-Mestizo populations. For the last three decades, this region has experienced a rapid process of modernization associated with a strong agribusiness development and an expansion of industrial maquila companies. Notwithstanding this trend, the Andean Indigenous peasant economy continues to be pivotal in the mountainous area of the region. This chapter presents a comparative analysis of fertility patterns among ethnic-racial minorities (Indigenous and Black) and White-Mestizo populations. It utilizes data from the 1993 and 2005 Colombian population censuses; the Colombian national register of households in poverty ; Colombian demographic and Cali household surveys from 2010 to 2015 and one Nasa-Indigenous household survey. In addition, it uses national statistics records of several countries and some data from specialized demographic studies of the World Bank and the United Nations from 2000 to 2015. Accordingly, an international comparison of fertilities among Colombian ethnic-racial minorities and their counterparts in other countries is possible. Conceptually, the chapter draws on insights from Johnstone’s work on Indigenous fertility transitions in developed countries and Caldwell’s transition theory to examine how the increasing levels of schooling and the changes in the occupational structure of this region are affecting the fertility transition of Indigenous and Black minorities.

Keywords

  • Fertility
  • Ethnic-racial groups
  • Nasa-Indigenous people
  • Black people
  • White-Mestizo population
  • Northern Cauca

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94869-0_2
  • Chapter length: 27 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-94869-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 2.1

Source Author’s elaboration based on IGAC mapping. IGAC: Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi

Fig. 2.2

Source Author’s estimates based on the Colombian 2005 census (DANE 2005)

Fig. 2.3

Source Author’s estimations based on the Colombian 2005 census (DANE 2005)

Fig. 2.4

Source Author’s estimates based on the 2005 census (DANE 2005), and the Nasa household survey , 2014/2015 (CIDSE 2016)

Fig. 2.5

Source Author’s estimates based on the 2005 census (DANE 2005), SISBEN III (DNP 2014), and NSHP 2014/2015 (CIDSE 2016)

Notes

  1. 1.

    For this chapter, the term “Mestizo” refers to those of mixed White European and South American Indigenous ancestry. The term “White-Mestizo” or “non-ethnic” population refers to the aggregate of people who in the Colombian case do not recognize themselves as Indigenous, or as Afro-descendant/Black or Mulatto or under another ethnic category. In other countries of Latin America, the “Mestizo” category exists separately from the White one. Unfortunately for Colombia this differentiation is not possible in census categories.

  2. 2.

    To avoid possible confusion, from here on, the department of Valle del Cauca is referred to as Valle.

  3. 3.

    The city of Cali has the highest concentration (in absolute terms) of Afro-descendants or Black people in Colombia. Furthermore, if northern Cauca and southern Valle are considered as belonging to the same area, this combined region would have the highest regional concentration of Black people in the whole country, as well as the third largest rural-urban concentration of Nasa-Indigenous people. At the 2005 Census, in this combined region of northern Cauca and southern Valle, the Black population made up about 35.0% of the entire population, with the Nasa-Indigenous another 6.0% and the White-Mestizo about 59.0%. At the national level, the percentages of the Black and Indigenous populations were considerably lower: Black 10.6%, Indigenous 3.3% and White-Mestizo 86.1%.

  4. 4.

    For the estimations of Total Fertility and age-specific rates of the Indigenous and Black populations, the methods of Coale and Trussell (1996) and of Stover and Kirmeyer (2007) were employed.

  5. 5.

    For the Indigenous and Black people, infant mortality rates were estimated using the procedures indicated by Sullivan (1972), Trussell (1975), and also Coale and Trussell (1996).

  6. 6.

    Ratio of children under 5 years of age per 1000 women of childbearing age.

  7. 7.

    See Urrea-Giraldo and Rodríguez-Sánchez (2014, pp. 13–14).

  8. 8.

    The 2005 census question on ethnic-racial information was: “According to your culture, people or physical features, do you recognize yourself as? 1. Indigenous 2. Rom 3. Raizal from the Archipelago of San Andrés 4. Palenquero from San Basilio 5. Black, mulatto, Afro-Colombian or Afro-descendant 6. None of the above.”

    If an interviewee chose “Indigenous”, then there was another question: “To which indigenous community do you belong?” Nowadays in Colombia, there are 102 Indigenous groups recognized by the National Constitution.

    The categories 3, 4 and 5 in Colombia are considered as Afro-descendants, generally accepted as meaning Black people.

    The category “None of the above” refers to people without ethnic or racial self-recognition (non-ethnic-racial belonging). Nevertheless, in several empirical studies—for example Urrea-Giraldo et al. (2014)—it has been demonstrated that more than 85% of people self-classified in this category (“None of the above”) were at the same time self-recognized as White or Mestizo, when the question was phrased in racial terms.

  9. 9.

    According to the 2005 census, this Indigenous community is the second largest Indigenous group in Colombia, with a total population of 195,400 people, which represents about 13.4% of the national Indigenous population (1,458,212 people in 102 Indigenous villages). Most of the Nasa-Indigenous people are settled in the department or province of Cauca: 173,125 people or 88.6% of the total Nasa people in Colombia. Of these, around 66% live in northern Cauca, of which 56.0% (63,987 people) are settled in the three municipalities with a predominantly Nasa population: Caldono, Jambaló, and Toribío.

  10. 10.

    The Embera people, studied by Arias-Valencia (2005), is an Indigenous people who inhabit the humid tropical rainforest of the Colombian Pacific region. It is an aboriginal group with very different sociodemographic patterns from the groups of the Colombian Andean region, such as Nasa, Misak, Coconuco, Yanacona, and Pasto. These five Andean groups have a peasant economy, based on small producers. On the other side, the same fertility differences can also be observed for the Wayuu people, who mostly live in a semi-desert region at sea level in the north of the country. According to the 2005 census, 78.6% of Colombian Aboriginal populations lived in rural areas, and less than 8.0% lived in large cities.

  11. 11.

    Author’s estimates based on the 2005 census data.

  12. 12.

    ECLAC: The United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. In Spanish it is CEPAL.

  13. 13.

    In 1993, Villa Rica was not yet a municipality, but this settlement has had, since its foundation, a Black majority.

  14. 14.

    An example is the Misak or Guambiano Indigenous community in Cauca. By 2005, Misak women had a Total Fertility of 3.16 births per woman and a health coverage of 80.8%. This contrasts with the TF of 4.51 and the 56.6% health coverage observed for the three Nasa-Indigenous municipalities in northern Cauca for that year. Thus, important differences in reproductive patterns and health coverage among Indigenous peoples in Cauca, as in other regions of Colombia, can be observed.

  15. 15.

    See Fig. 2.4, in the case of Nasa-Indigenous women in the three Indigenous municipalities. For Black women living in the Black municipalities the value is estimated from data reported by public health programmes of the department of Cauca.

  16. 16.

    SISBEN III’s register does not have a question of ethnic-racial self-recognition, as the Colombian population census has. Therefore, it is not possible to differentiate Black from White-Mestizo population. However, in the Black municipalities of Puerto Tejada and Villa Rica, almost all the population are Black.

  17. 17.

    In Colombia, the 2005 census corresponds to the census round of the 2000s in Latin America.

  18. 18.

    Resguardos: these were the lands that the Spanish Crown gave to the Indigenous peoples, and that lately several republican constitutions, particularly the one of 1991 (in Colombia), have acknowledged.

References

  • Arias-Valencia, M. M. (2005). Determinantes próximos de la fecundidad: comportamiento reproductivo de las indígenas Chamibida de Antioquia, Colombia. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 21(4), 1087–1098. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2005000400011.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C., Caldwell, B., Caldwell, P., McDonald, P. F., & Schindlmayr, T. (2006). Demographic transition theory. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL. (2014). Los pueblos indígenas en América Latina: Avances en el último decenio y retos pendientes para la garantía de sus derechos. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    Google Scholar 

  • CIDSE. (2016). Encuesta Piloto Experimental Nasa de Unidades Domésticas y Productivas, EPEN [Nasa-Indigenous survey of household and productive units, NSHP]: Micro data. Santiago de Cali: Centro de investigaciones y documentación socio-económica (CIDSE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A., & Trussell, J. (1996). The development and use of demographic models. Population Studies, 50(3), 469–484.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • DANE. (1993). Census, micro-data. Bogotá: Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE).

    Google Scholar 

  • DANE. (2005). Census, special procedures for ethnic-racial groups of micro-data. Bogotá: Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE).

    Google Scholar 

  • DANE. (2007). Colombia. Estimación de la Mortalidad 1985–2005, Conciliación Censal 1985–2005. Bogotá: Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE).

    Google Scholar 

  • DNP. (2014). Sistema de Identificación de Potenciales Beneficiarios de Programas Sociales—SISBEN III [Colombian national register of identification system for the selection of potential beneficiaries of social public programs]: Micro-data of Cauca and Valle departments. Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). https://www.sisben.gov.co/sisben/Paginas/Sisb%C3%A9n-III.aspx. Accessed October 1, 2018.

  • ECLAC. (2014). Guaranteeing Indigenous people’s rights in Latin America. Progress in the past decade and remaining challenges. Summary. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/37051/4/S1420782_en.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2018.

  • ECLAC, & UNFPA. (2007). Social panorama of Latin America 2006. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC); United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/1226/1/PSI2006.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2018.

  • Eriksen, T. H. (1993). Ethnicity and nationalism: Anthropological perspectives. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimond, E., & Robitaille, N. (2013). Early parenting in First Nations: Is there a link to community well-being? http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2013/aadnc-aandc/R3-171-2012-eng.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2018.

  • Halli, S. S., Trovato, F., & Driedger, L. (Eds.). (1990). Ethnic demography: Canadian immigrant, racial and cultural variations. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEI. (2007). II census of Indigenous communities of the Peruvian Amazon. XI population and housing census of Peru. Lima: Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática del Perú (INEI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, K. (2011). Indigenous fertility transitions in developed countries. New Zealand Population Review, 37, 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehohla, P. (2015). Census 2011: Fertility in South Africa. Statistics South Africa. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-01-63/Report-03-01-632011.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2018.

  • Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J. K., Curtin, S. C., & Mathews, T. J. (2011). Births: Final data for 2013. U.S. Department of Health; Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_01.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2018.

  • Ministerio de Trabajo. (2013). 2012–2013 Encuesta de Empleo y Calidad de Vida (EECV) en Cali [2012–2013 Survey of employment and quality of life in Cali]. https://planeacion.cali.gov.co/amda/index.php/catalog/1. Accessed October 1, 2018.

  • Paixão, M., Rosseto, I., Montonavele, F., & Carvano, L. M. (2010). Relatório anual das desigualdades raciais no Brasil, 2009–2010. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond Universitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piñeres-Petersen, M., & Ruiz-Salguero, M. (1998). Aspectos demográficos en comunidades indígenas de tres regiones de Colombia. Salud Pública de México, 40(4), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0036-36341998000400004.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Piñeres-Petersen, M., & Sabogal, L. E. (1999). Conocimientos, Actitudes y Prácticas en Salud en Comunidades Indígenas, Colombia, 1993–1994. Bogotá: División de Investigación Social en Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS), Ministerio de Salud, División de Biblioteca y Publicaciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Profamilia. (2011). Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud—ENDS 2010 [National demographic and health survey 2010]. Bogotá. www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/ED/GCFI/Base%20de%20datos%20ENDS%202010%20informe.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2018.

  • Profamilia. (2017). ENDS 2015. Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud 2015 Tomo I (National demographic and health survey 2015, NDHS 2015). Bogotá.

    Google Scholar 

  • SISPAE. (2004). Los Afroecuatorianos en cifras. Discriminación, exclusión según las estadísticas sociales del Ecuador. Quito: Sistema de Indicadores Sociales del Ecuador (SISPAE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa. (2010). Estimation of fertility from the 2007 community survey of South Africa. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-00-04/Report-03-00-042010.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2018.

  • Stover, J., & Kirmeyer, S. (2007). DemProj version 4. Programme informatique pour les projections démographiques. Système Spectrum des modèles politiques. Washington, DC: Spectrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. M. (1972). Models for the estimation of the probability of dying between birth and exact ages of early childhood. Population Studies, 26(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1972.10405204.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Telles, E. E., & Project on Ethnicity and Race in Latin America (Eds.). (2014). Pigmentocracies: Ethnicity, race, and color in Latin America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussell, J. (1975). A re-estimation of the multiplying factors for the brass technique for determining childhood survivorship rates. Population Studies, 29(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2173427.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Urrea-Giraldo, F. (2010). Patrones sociodemográficos de la región sur del Valle y norte del Cauca a través de la dimensión étnica-racial. In L. C. Castillo (Ed.), Etnicidad, Acción Colectiva y Resistencia: El norte del Cauca y el sur del Valle a comienzos del siglo XXI (pp. 25–124). Santiago de Cali: Programa Editorial Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad del Valle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrea-Giraldo, F. (2012). Transformaciones sociodemográficas y grupos socio-raciales en Cali a lo largo del siglo XX y comienzos del siglo XXI. In J. B. Garzón (Ed.), Historia de Cali, siglo XX: Tomo I: Espacio urbano (pp. 145–194). Santiago de Cali: Programa Editorial Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad del Valle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrea-Giraldo, F., & Botero-Arias, W. F. (2010). Patrones sociodemográficos diferenciales en Bogotá y Cali, con base en el censo 2005, y la presencia de clases medias negras en las dos ciudades. Sociedad y Economía, 18, 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrea-Giraldo, F., & Rodríguez, D. A. (2012). Transformaciones sociodemográficas y de condiciones de vida en dos pueblos indígenas y poblaciones negras en el norte del Cauca en el período intercensal 1993–2005. Colombia Médica, 43(2), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_acku_serial_hv640_4_a34_i684b_v2_1988.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Urrea-Giraldo, F., & Rodriguez-Sánchez, D. A. (2014). Collecting ethnic and racial data in censuses and surveys: The Latin American experience in the cases of Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Peru. Revista de História Comparada, 8(1), 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrea-Giraldo, F., Viáfara, L. C., & Viveros Vigoya, M. (2014). From whitened miscegenation to tri-ethnic multiculturalism. Race and ethnicity in Colombia. In E. E. Telles & Project on Ethnicity and Race in Latin America (Eds.), Pigmentocracies: Ethnicity, race, and color in Latin America (pp. 81–125). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrea-Giraldo, F., Castaño, J. A., & Quiroz, L. G. (2017). Mercado de trabajo, fuerza de trabajo y economía campesina indígena Nasa en tres municipios del norte del Cauca (Toribío, Jambaló y Caldono). Controversia, 2017(207), 114–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, P. (2010). Race and ethnicity in Latin America. London: Pluto Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (n.d.). Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator. Accessed September 21, 2018.

  • World Bank. (2017). World Bank country and lending groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519. Accessed September 27, 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Andrés Fernando Valencia for his insights and for improving the text in English. Also, the valuable assistance of Andres Felipe Candelo Álvarez whose expertise greatly assisted this research. Lastly, I appreciate the helpful discussions of the work with Christian Mauricio Chacua, Luis Gabriel Quiroz, and Angela Melissa Guzmán.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Urrea-Giraldo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex

Annex

See Tables 2.7 and 2.8.

Table 2.7 Sociodemographic and standard of living indicators for three Nasa-Indigenous municipalities and two Black municipalities of northern Cauca, compared to the Department of Cauca and Cali, 1993 and 2005
Table 2.8 Sociodemographic and living standards indicators for Nasa-Indigenous people of three northern Cauca municipalities by 2014/2015 versus Black, Indigenous and White-Mestizo (non-ethnic) populations in Cali by 2012/2013

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Urrea-Giraldo, F. (2019). The Demographic Transition in the Nasa-Indigenous and Black Populations of Northern Cauca (Colombia). In: Anson, J., Bartl, W., Kulczycki, A. (eds) Studies in the Sociology of Population. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94869-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94869-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94868-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94869-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)