Machine Usability Effects on Preferences for Hot Drinks

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 775)


Research suggests that usability of a machine affects consumers’ preference for the machine. However, there is no research available to explain if evaluation of a product prepared using that machine, is likely to be impacted by the usability of the machine. In a controlled study using three trials, participants prepared hot beverages using two different beverage machines that also differed in their usability. In all three trials, machine usability, participants’ drink selections and evaluations of hot drinks prepared on the machines were measured. Our results indicate that machine usability influences consumers’ preference for the products prepared on these machines.


Machine usability Consumer behavior Product preferences End products 


  1. 1.
    Creusen, M.E., Schoormans, J.P.: The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 22(1), 63–81 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zajonc, R.B., Markus, H.: Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. J. Consum. Res. 9(2), 123–131 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Keinonen, T.: Expected usability and product preference. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 197–204. ACM, New York, August 1997Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akrimi, Y., Khemakhem, P.R.: An analysis of perceived usability, perceived interactivity and website personality and their effects on consumer satisfaction. Int. J. Manag. Excell. 2(3), 227–236 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koufaris, M.: Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(2), 205–223 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bai, B., Law, R., Wen, I.: The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: evidence from Chinese online visitors. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 27(3), 391–402 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steenkamp, J.B.E., Baumgartner, H.: The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. J. Consum. Res. 19(3), 434–448 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gardner, M.P.: Mood states and consumer behavior: a critical review. J. Consum. Res. 12(3), 281–300 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen, J., Pham, M., Andrade, E.: The nature and role of affect in consumer behavior (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Albert, A., Anderson, J.: On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models. Biometrika 71(1), 1–10 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grönroos, C.: Marketing services: the case of a missing product. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 13(4/5), 322–338 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bendapudi, N., Leone, R.P.: Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. J. Mark. 67(1), 14–28 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Troye, S.V., Supphellen, M.: Consumer participation in coproduction: “I made it myself” effects on consumers’ sensory perceptions and evaluations of outcome and input product. J. Mark. 76(2), 33–46 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wolf, M., McQuitty, S.: Understanding the do-it-yourself consumer: DIY motivations and outcomes. AMS Rev. 1(3–4), 154–170 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moisio, R., Arnould, E.J., Gentry, J.W.: Productive consumption in the class-mediated construction of domestic masculinity: Do-It-Yourself (DIY) home improvement in men’s identity work. J. Consum. Res. 40(2), 298–316 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations