Skip to main content

Research on Visual Sensing Capability Difference Between Designers and Non-designers Based on Difference Threshold Measurement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 775))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1058 Accesses

Abstract

It is often found that designers are more sensitive to subtle differences in shape and forms. it seems easier for them to find these subtle differences than ordinary people. Can some of the designer’s professional training enhance people’s visual sensing capability? Based on this hypothesis, this study attempts to measure visual difference thresholds of two groups of design majors and non design majors. In the study, two groups of subjects were randomly selected among the 18–25 year old college students. A group of 20 students who had received design training for at least half a year (Design-group for short, DG). The other group of 25 students who did not have any design training (Non-design group for short, NDG). Then, based on the method of constant stimuli, a cell phone icon was chosen as standard stimulus whose size varied according to the percentage change. The subjects would compare and judge the change of the icon’s size and the visual difference thresholds of the two groups were aquired. Finally, we conducted a questionnaire survey on all the subjects to investigate the types of visual training that they had received to figure out the possible factors which might enhance the designers’ visual sensing capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guo, X.Y., Yang, Z.L.: Experimental Psychology. People’s Education Press, Beijing (2004). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, S.: Basic Psychology, pp. 248–257. Educational Science Press, Beijing (2001). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kantowitz, B.H., Roediger, H.L., Elmes, D.G.: Experimental Psychology, pp. 208–211. West Publishing Company, St. Paul (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hu, Z.-J.: The method of constant stimuli. J. Mu Dan Jiang Normal Coll. (Philos. Soc. Sci. Ed.) (3), 79–80 (1995). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richard, J.G., Philip, G.Z.: Psychology and Life. Allyn and Bacon, A Pearson Education Company, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, X.: A research on human perception of the area of the BasicGeometry. Institute of Industrial Design, Yunlin National University of Science and Technology, Taiwan (2004). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, G., Yu, S., Chu, J.: Practical significance and accomplishment method for innovative design of scaled-down Ming and Qing Dynasty furniture with Tenon and Mortise structure. J. Northwest For. Univ. 24(1), 170–172 (2008). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, J., Yu, S., Yang, G., Zhang, X.: Difference threshold of proportion of a human being on configuration. Mech. Sci. Technol. Aerosp. Eng. 30(5), 767–769 (2011). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, Z.-Q.: Traditional psychophysics method and signal detection theory. J. Liaoning Teach. Coll. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 29(5), 73–75 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Key R & D program “R & D of Multifunction Cane and Beet Harvest Technology and Equipment” (2016YFD0701200), Sub-project “Research on Key Technologies of Efficient Harvesting and Intelligent control for Cane and Beet Efficient Harvesting Equipments” (2016YFD0701201) and “The research and development of the intelligent fining production management technology and equipment for livestock and poultry breeding” (2017YFD0701605-2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sha Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, S., Li, R., Dai, J. (2019). Research on Visual Sensing Capability Difference Between Designers and Non-designers Based on Difference Threshold Measurement. In: Ayaz, H., Mazur, L. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 775. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94866-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics