Skip to main content

Case Study Three: Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Affect Theory, Genre, and the Example of Tragedy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism ((PSATLC))

  • 651 Accesses

Abstract

Miller’s Death of a Salesman provides a third example of the disgust-shame dyad and contamination scripts in a tragedy. Salesman shows the fullest integration of the protagonist’s personality with the play’s dramatic structure. Despite radical cultural-historical differences, tragedy again depends on disgust-shame scripts in the protagonist’s personality structure. Miller provides context in justifying the “tragedy of the common man.” Willy and Biff Loman’s mutually reflected (self-)disgust contamination scripts are mediated by shame damage-reparation scripts. Their conflict’s foundation is a “nuclear scene” and consequential “nuclear script.” For Tomkins, “nuclear scripts represent the tragic” vision of life because they lead people into self-destructive behaviours. Willy and Biff reveal actions that traditional psychoanalysis call unconscious motivations. Both, however, are fully conscious of their truth. In the end, as much as Biff and Willy reject one another due to moral-disgust contamination during the nuclear scene, so are they drawn to repair the damage by the attraction of their mutually remembered ideal. Willy’s tragedy is that he captures Biff’s love but too late.

… Your high-engendered battles ‘gainst a head

So old and white as this. O, ho! ‘tis foul

Shakespeare, King Lear

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an excellent overview of this debate, see Stephen Barker’s (1995) “The Crisis of Authenticity: Death of a Salesman and the Tragic Muse” and Terry Otten’s (2002) “Death of a Salesman.”

  2. 2.

    Miller responds to several types of these criticisms in his “Introduction to Collected Plays.”

  3. 3.

    This description is a good example of why Sedgwick and Frank call Tomkins’ writing style an “alchemy of the contingent” (1995, 6).

  4. 4.

    Overall, Schneider’s reading turns the play into Happy’s dream, as if “inside Hap’s head” rather than Willy’s. This is untenable, except perhaps as an over-determined Freudian transference. For additional Freudian readings, see Chester Eisinger’s (1970) “Focus on Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman: The Wrong Dreams” and Karl Harshbarger’s (1979) The Burning Jungle: An Analysis of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman.

Bibliography

  • Adamson, Joseph. 1997. Melville, Shame, and the Evil Eye: A Psychoanalytic Reading. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Stephen. 1995. The Crisis of Authenticity: Death of a Salesman and the Tragic Muse. In Approaches to Teaching Miller’s Death of a Salesman, ed. Matthew C. Roudane, 82–101. New York: Modern Language Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centola, Steven R. 2000. ‘The Condition of Tension’: Unity of Opposites as Dramatic Form and Vision in Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman. In ‘The Salesman Has a Birthday’: Essays Celebrating the Fiftieth Anniversary of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, ed. Stephen A. Marino, 53–64. New York: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Family Values in Death of a Salesman. In Willy Loman, ed. Harold Bloom, 55–64. Philadelphia: Chelsea House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisinger, Chester. 1970. Focus on Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman: The Wrong Dreams. In American Dreams, American Nights, ed. David Madden, 165–175. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, Paul, and Wallace Friesen. 1975. Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadomi, Leah. 2005. Fantasy and Reality: Dramatic Rhythm in Death of a Salesman. In Willy Loman, ed. Harold Bloom, 33–52. Philadelphia: Chelsea House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshbarger, Karl. 1979. The Burning Jungle: An Analysis of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. 1962. Hegel on Tragedy. Ed. and trans. by Anne and Henry Paolucci. Garden City: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. Werke 15: Vorlesungen über die Ästhetik III. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Gershen. 1992. Shame: The Power of Caring. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur. (1949) 1976. Death of a Salesman. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. Introduction to Collected Plays. In Death of a Salesman: Text and Criticism, ed. Gerald Weales, 135–171. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978a. Tragedy and the Common Man. In The Theatre Essays of Arthur Miller, ed. Robert A. Martin, 3–7. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978b. The Nature of Tragedy. In The Theatre Essays of Arthur Miller, ed. Robert A. Martin, 8–11. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978c. The Salesman Has a Birthday. In The Theatre Essays of Arthur Miller, ed. Robert A. Martin, 12–15. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978d. On Social Plays. In The Theatre Essays of Arthur Miller, ed. Robert A. Martin, 51–68. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978e. The Family in Modern Drama. In The Theatre Essays of Arthur Miller, ed. Robert A. Martin, 69–85. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Death of a Salesman at Fifty: Still ‘Coming Home to Roost’. In Willy Loman, ed. Harold Bloom, 133–162. Philadelphia: Chelsea House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, Donald. 1992. Shame and Pride: Affect, Sex, and the Birth of the Self. New York: W. W. Norton & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten, Terry. 2002. The Temptation of Innocence in the Dramas of Arthur Miller. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford University Press. 1989. Oxford English Dictionary, vol. 11, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Richard B. 1992. Tragedy and Tragic Theory: An Analytical Guide. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribkoff, Fred. 2000. Shame, Guilt, Empathy, and the Search for Identity in Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman. Modern Drama 43 (1): 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roudané, Matthew. 1987. Conversations with Arthur Miller. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Death of a Salesman and the Poetics of Arthur Miller. In The Cambridge Companion to Arthur Miller, ed. Christopher Bigsby, 60–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Celebrating Salesman. In ‘The Salesman Has a Birthday’: Essays Celebrating the Fiftieth Anniversary of Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, ed. Stephen A. Marino, 19–28. New York: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Daniel E. 1967. Play of Dreams. In Death of a Salesman: Text and Criticism, ed. Gerald Weales, 250–258. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, and Adam Frank. 1995. Shame and the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins. In Shame and Its Sisters, 1–28. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. 1958. In King Lear, ed. Alfred Harbage. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, Silvan S. 1962. Affect Imagery Consciousness: The Positive Affects. Vol. 1. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. Affect Imagery Consciousness: The Negative Affects. Vol. 2. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Affect Imagery Consciousness: The Negative Affects: Anger and Fear. Vol. 3. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Affect Imagery Consciousness: Cognition. Vol. 4. New York: Springer Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. In Exploring Affect, ed. E. Virginia Demos. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lucas, D.A. (2018). Case Study Three: Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman . In: Affect Theory, Genre, and the Example of Tragedy. Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94863-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics