Skip to main content

Reframing Campus Climate Data to Advocate for Institutional Transformation, Praxis, and Activism for LGBQQ+ College Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evaluating Campus Climate at US Research Universities

Abstract

In this chapter, Hoffman and Pryor use SERU data to show how LGBQQ+ students perceive campus climate and propose ways scholars and practitioners might reframe these data to advocate for institutional transformation and imagine new ways of being for LGBQQ+ students. The authors use the traditionally heterogendered institution critical conceptual framework to show how a reliance on institutions as the solutions to LGBQQ+ students’ problems may, in fact, constrain ways of being for students and inadvertently uphold existing hierarchies of gender and sexuality. We advocate for scholars and practitioners to use campus climate data to push for institutional transformation, improve praxis, and create avenues for activism that extend beyond the walls of the institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baez, B. (2007). Thinking critically about the “critical”: Quantitative research as social critique. New Directions for Institutional Research, 133, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilodeau, B. (2009). Genderism: Transgender students, binary systems and higher education. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst, C. J. (2014). Campus activism in the 21st century: A historical framing. New Directions for Higher Education, 167, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. D., Clarke, B., Gortmaker, V., & Robinson-Keilig, R. (2004). Assessing campus climate for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (GLBT) students using a multiple perspectives approach. Journal of College Student Development, 45(1), 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos, M., & Cole, D. (2015). Disentangling the impact of diversity courses: Examining the influence of diversity course content on students’ civic engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 56(8), 794–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, S. (2011a). Factor structure and reliability of the 2011 SERU/UCUES questionnaire core: SERU project technical report. Berkeley: Center for Studies of Higher Education, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, S. (2011b). No evidence of substantive non-response bias for the 2011 administration: SERU project technical report. Berkeley: Center for Studies of Higher Education, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education. (2015). CAS professional standards for higher education (9th ed.). Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, J. A., Thomson, G., & Zhao, C.-M. (2012). The learning outcomes race: The value of self-reported gains in large research universities. Higher Education, 64, 317–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, N. J., & Broido, E. M. (1999). Coming out in college residence halls: Negotiation, meaning making, challenges, supports. Journal of College Student Development, 40(6), 658–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, L. E. (2012). The context of creating space: Assessing the likelihood of college LGBT center presence. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, J. C. (2017). Considerations for queer as a sexual identity classification in education survey research. Journal of College Student Development, 58(7), 1113–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, J. C., & Rankin, S. R. (2015). Making the grade? Classroom climate for LGBTQ students across gender conformity. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 52(2), 190–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, J. C., Hart, J., Metcalfe, A. S., & Fellabaum-Toston, J. (in press). Methodological troubles with gender and sex in higher education survey research. Review of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, J. C., Rankin, S., Beemyn, G., & Windmeyer, S. (2017). Improving the campus climate for LGBTQ students using the campus pride index. New Directions for Student Services, 159, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, M., & Kern-Daniels, R. (1977). Toward a sociological theory of gender and sex. The American Sociologist, 12(4), 182–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. R., & Hurtado, S. (2007). Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional transformation. In S. R. Harper & L. D. Patton (Eds.), Responding to the realities of race on campus. New directions for student services (Vol. 120, pp. 7–24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. L., & Fellabaum, J. (2008). Analyzing campus climate studies: Seeking to define and understand. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(4), 222–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, C. (1996). The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. Sociological Theory, 12(2), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, C. (2002). Heterosexuality: It’s just not natural! In D. Richardson & S. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of lesbian and gay studies (pp. 73–82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, S. V. (2012). Constructing outsiders: The discursive framing of access in university diversity policies. The Review of Higher Education, 35(2), 149–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, M. (2014). Debt to society: Accounting for life under capitalism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marine, S. B. (2011). Stonewall’s legacy: Bisexual, gay, lesbian, and transgender students in higher education: AEHE (Vol. 152). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R., & Hatemi, P. K. (2011). Distinguishing sex and gender. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(1), 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolazzo, Z. (2016). “Just go in looking good”: The resilience, resistance, and kinship-building of trans* college students. Journal of College Student Development, 57(5), 538–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, L. D. (2010). Cultural centers in higher education: Perspectives on identity, theory, and practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, M. J., & Hoffman, G. D. (2015). Traditionally heterogendered institutions: Discourses surrounding LGBTQ college students. Journal for LGBT Youth, 12(1), 64–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. T. (2015). Out in the classroom: Transgender student experiences at a large public university. Journal of College Student Development, 56(5), 438–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. T. (2018). Visualizing queer spaces: LGBTQ students and the traditionally heterogendered institution. Journal of LGBT Youth, 15(1), 32–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. T., & Hoffman, G. D. (2017). Navigating the traditionally heterogendered institution: Resistance strategies from the field. Poster presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education annual meeting, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. T., Ta, D., & Hart, J. (2016). Searching for home: Transgender students and experiences with residential housing. College Student Affairs Journal, 34(2), 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, S. R. (2003). Campus climate for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people: A national perspective. New York, NY: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, S., & Reason, R. (2008). Transformational tapestry model: A comprehensive approach to transforming campus climate. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(4), 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, S., Weber, G., Blumenfield, W., & Frazer, S. (2010). 2010 state of higher education for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. Charlotte, NC: Campus Pride.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, K. A. (2010). LGBT and queer research in higher education: The state and status of the field. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, R. A. (1998). Freedom’s web: Student activism in an age of cultural diversity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (1993). Feminism and geography: The limits of geographical knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanlo, R. L., Rankin, S., & Schoenberg, R. (Eds.). (2002). Our place on campus: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender services and programs in higher education. Westwood, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stage, F. K. (2007). Answering critical questions using quantitative data. New Directions for Institutional Research, 13, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. L. (2017, November). Identity-based campus centers as power(full) places? Prospects for Liberatory Praxis. Symposium presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education annual meeting, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayhorn, T. L. (2012). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro, A. (2012). Campus microclimates for LGBT faculty, staff, and students: An exploration of the intersections of social identity and campus roles. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 49(4), 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. R., Howell, M. L., Silverschanz, P., & Yu, L. (2012). “That’s so gay!”: Examining the covariates of hearing this expression among gay, lesbian, and bisexual college students. Journal of American College Health, 60(6), 429–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. R., Kulick, A., & Atteberry, B. (2015). Protective factors, campus climate, and health outcomes among sexual minority college students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 8(2), 73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoffman, G.D., Pryor, J.T. (2018). Reframing Campus Climate Data to Advocate for Institutional Transformation, Praxis, and Activism for LGBQQ+ College Students. In: Soria, K. (eds) Evaluating Campus Climate at US Research Universities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94836-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94836-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94835-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94836-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics