Grover, L.K.: A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In: Proceedings of 28th STOC (1996)
Google Scholar
Magniez, F., Santha, M., Szegedy, M.: Quantum algorithms for the triangle problem. SIAM J. Comput. 37(2), 413–424 (2007)
MathSciNet
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Ozols, M., Roetteler, M., Roland, J.: Quantum rejection sampling. ACM Trans. Comput. Theory 5(3), 1–33 (2013)
MathSciNet
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H., Matsumoto, K., Tani, S.: Simpler exact leader election via quantum reduction. Chic. J. Theor. Comput. Sci. 2014(10) (2014)
Google Scholar
Berry, D.W., Childs, A.M., Cleve, R., Kothari, R., Somma, R.D.: Exponential improvement in precision for simulating sparse Hamiltonians. In: Proceedings of the 46th STOC (2014)
Google Scholar
Brassard, G., Høyer, P., Mosca, M., Tapp, A.: Quantum amplitude amplication and estimation. Contemp. Math. 305, 53–74 (2002)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Yoder, T.J., Low, G.H., Chuang, I.L.: Fixed-point quantum search with an optimal number of queries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 210501 (2014). https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.210501
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Lipton, R.J., Regan, K.W.: Quantum Algorithms via Linear Algebra: A Primer. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)
MATH
Google Scholar
Kawachi, A., Kawano, K., Le Gall, F., Tamaki, S.: Quantum query complexity of unitary operator discrimination. In: Cao, Y., Chen, J. (eds.) COCOON 2017. LNCS, vol. 10392, pp. 309–320. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62389-4_26
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Bera, D.: Detection and diagnosis of single faults in quantum circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 37(3), 587–600 (2018)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Acin, A.: Statistical distinguishability between unitary operations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(17), 177901 (2001)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Bennett, C.H., Bernstein, E., Brassard, G., Vazirani, U.: Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing. SIAM J. Comput. 26(5), 1510–1523 (1997)
MathSciNet
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Biham, E., Biham, O., Biron, D., Grassl, M., Lidar, D.A.: Grover’s quantum search algorithm for an arbitrary initial amplitude distribution. Phys. Rev. A 60(4), 2742 (1999)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Biham, E., Kenigsberg, D.: Grover’s quantum search algorithm for an arbitrary initial mixed state. Phys. Rev. A 66(6), 062301 (2002)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Høyer, P.: Arbitrary phases in quantum amplitude amplification. Phys. Rev. A 62(5), 052304 (2000)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
D’Ariano, G.M., Presti, P.L., Paris, M.G.: Using entanglement improves the precision of quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(27), 270404 (2001)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Duan, R., Feng, Y., Ying, M.: Entanglement is not necessary for perfect discrimination between unitary operations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(10), 100503 (2007)
MathSciNet
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Bera, D.: Amplitude amplification for operator identification and randomized classes. Technical report TR14-151. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (2018)
Google Scholar
Bera, D., Green, F., Homer, S.: Small depth quantum circuits. ACM SIGACT News 38(2), 35–50 (2007)
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Høyer, P., de Wolf, R.: Improved quantum communication complexity bounds for disjointness and equality. In: Alt, H., Ferreira, A. (eds.) STACS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2285, pp. 299–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45841-7_24
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Buhrman, H., de Wolf, R.: Communication complexity lower bounds by polynomials. In: Proceedings of the 16th CCC (2001)
Google Scholar