Advertisement

Balanced Scorecard Quality Information Dashboards Model for Competitive Business Advantage

  • Wiwit SuksangaramEmail author
  • Kritchana Wongrat
  • Sopaporn Klamsakul
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 807)

Abstract

The results showed that: (1) information Technology alliance of balanced scorecard to make a difference in the business. A total of 66 to share the information for senior executives of eight of the information technology executive with a total of 20 patents and information for management at the number 38 and by the many more who do not accept the information as significant. Statistic of 0.05.

All of this evidence. The innovative concept is considered in the analysis and design information that is appropriate for the agency. Creating a competitive advantage by using IT as a business tool. Using IT queue. To solve business problems, including quality tools. Air Quality Methodology Balance Scorecard. The integration of information science. Including analysis and design of information systems for organizations. And computer tools, including design input – processing –released. Correlation analysis of the information contained in each (stepwise Refinement) by the model information. That represents the relationship in the form of tables. Three-dimensional matrix, the people who want to bring this concept to the development of Information systems should understand before applying to the agency’s next.

Keywords

Balanced scorecard Quality information technology Dashboards 

References

  1. 1.
    Sungrung, P.: Production management. Suan Dusit Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Publications the President and Fellows of Harvard College (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chookittikul, J.: Quality information technology. Computer and Advanced Technology, 8th edn., vol. 8, pp. 8–9. Phetchaburi Thailand (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asosheh, A., Nalchigar, S., Jamporazmey, M.: Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 37 5931–5938 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rajesh, R., Pugazhendhi, S., Ganesh, K., Ducq, Y., Lenny Koh, S.C.: Generic balanced scorecard framework for third party logistics service provider. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140, 269–282 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kadarova, J., Durkacova, M., Kalafusova, L.: Balanced scorecard as an issue taught in the field of industrial engineering. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 143, 174–179 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amado, C.A.F., Santos, S.P., Marques, P.M.: Integrating the data envelopment analysis and the balanced scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment. Omega 40, 390–403 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jalaliyoon, N., Bakar, N.A., Taherdoost, H.: Propose a methodology to implement balanced scorecard for operational appraisal of industrial groups. In: The 7th International Conference Interdisciplinary in Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 659–666 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laudon, K.C., Laudon, J.P.: Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm, 9th edn. Person Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wiwit Suksangaram
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kritchana Wongrat
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sopaporn Klamsakul
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer BusinessPhetchaburi Rajabhat UniversityPhetchaburiThailand
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationPhetchaburi Rajabhat UniversityPhetchaburiThailand

Personalised recommendations