Skip to main content

Egress Model Testing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
SFPE Guide to Human Behavior in Fire

Abstract

This chapter is intended to provide guidance for egress model users regarding:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    And therefore the model itself.

  2. 2.

    In reality, every time a user configures a model s/he is effectively developing a new model; however, the distinction between model user and developer is maintained here for simplicity.

  3. 3.

    Or establish that these questions have already been asked.

  4. 4.

    Typically called agents.

  5. 5.

    It should be noted in real-incidents some evacuees may not be exposed to fire effluent and therefore may be similarly reliant upon notification as are evacuees during an egress drill.

  6. 6.

    Might be expanded to the more formal Delphi Method.

  7. 7.

    Importance of independence within each sample – different runs, summary stat comparison.

  8. 8.

    Statistical hypothesis tests mentioned above (e.g. chi-square and t-test) typically often employ a null hypothesis that make comparisons based on the assumption that the simulated and benchmark data sets are from the same population – the alternative hypothesis would then state that they are different in some way. As the simulation can only ever be a simplification of the real-world conditions, this null hypothesis is, by definition, false should real-world data be part of the comparison.

References

  1. R. Lovreglio, E. Ronchi and D. Borri, “The Validation of Evacuation Simulation Models through the Analysis of Behavioural Uncertainty,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 46, no. 37, pp. 166–174, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. E. Boyce, T. J. Shields and W. H. Silcock, “Toward the Characterization of Building Occupancies for Fire Safety Engineering: Capabilites of Disabled People Moving Horizontally and on an Incline,” Fire Techology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 51–67, Feburary 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. R. Galea, M. Sauter, S. Deere and L. Filippidis, “Investigating the Impact of Culture on Evacuation Behavior - A Turkish Data-Set,” Fire Safety Science, pp. 709–722, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. D. Averill, D. S. Mileti, R. D. Peacock, E. D. Kuligowski, N. Groner, G. Proulx, P. A. Reneke and H. E. Nelson, “Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergency Communication. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. M. V. Gwynne, “Optimizing Fire Alarm Notification for High Risk Groups: Notification Effectiveness for Large Groups,” prepared for The Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. L. Bryan, “An Examination and Analysis of the Dynamics of the Human Behavior in the MGM Grand Hotel Fire,” National Fire Protection Assoication, Quincy, MA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Grosshandler, N. Bryner, D. Madrzykowski and K. Kuntz, “Report of the Technical Investigation of the Station Nightclub Fire,” National Insititute of Standards and Technology, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. D. Kuligowski, “Terror Defeated: Occupant Sensemaking, Decision-making and Protective Action in the 2001 World Trade Center Disaster,” University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. M. V. Gwynne, E. D. Kuligowski and D. Nilsson, “Representing Evacuation Behaviour in Engineering Terms,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 133–150, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. M. V. Gwynne and E. R. Rosenbaum, “Employing the Hydraulic Model in Assessing Emergency Movement,” in SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 5th edition, Chapter 59, Gaithersburg, Maryland: Society of Fire Protection Engineers, 2016, pp. 2115–2151.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Proulx, “Evacuation Time and Movement in Apartment Buildings,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 229–246, December 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. D. Kuligowski and S. M. V. Gwynne, “What a User Should Know When Selecting an Evacuation Model,” Fire Protection Engineering, no. 28, pp. 30–35, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, “AIAA Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations,” Reston, VA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Lord, B. J. Meacham and A. Moore, “Guide for Evaluating the Predictive Capabilities of Computer Egress Models,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. K. Bharathy and B. G. Silverman, “Validating Agent Based Social Systems Models,” in 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, Baltimore, MD, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. G. Sargent, “Verification and Validation of Simulation Models,” in Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, Baltimore, MD, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. G. Sargent, “A New Statistical Procedure for Validation of Simulation and Stochastic Models,” Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. G. Sargent, “Some Approaches and Paradigms for Verifying and Validating Simulation Models,” in Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. P. Kleijnen, “Theory and Methodology: Verification and Validation of Simulation Models,” European Journal of Operation Research, vol. 82, pp. 145–162, 1995.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. M. D. Petty, “Calculating and Using Confidence Intervals for Model Validation,” in Proceedings of the Fall 2012 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. J. White, A. Rassweiler, J. F. Samhouri, A. C. Stier and C. White, “Ecologists Should Not Use Statistical Significance Tests to Interpret Simulation Model Results,” Oikos, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. D. Petty, “Advanced Topics in Calculating and Using Confidence Intervals for Model Validation,” in Proceedings of the Spring 2013 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, San Diego, CA, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. D. Petty, “Verification, Validation, and Accreditation,” in Modeling and Simulation Fundamentals: Theoretical Underpinnings and Practical Domains, J. A. Sokolowski and C. M. Banks, Eds., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010, pp. 325–372.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. W. E. Baker and M. S. Taylor, “A Nonparametric Statistical Approach to the Validation of Computer Simulation Models,” US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. K. Dey, “Lessons Learned in the ICFMP Project for Verification and Validation of Computer Models for Nuclear Plant Fire Safety Analysis,” in Ninth International Conference on Performance-Based Codes and Fire Safety Design Methods, Hong Kong, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. K. Mok and W. K. Chow, “"Verification and Validation" in Modeling Fire by Computational Fluid Dynamics,” International Journal on Architectural Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 58–67, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Rein, E. Abecassis and R. Carvel, Eds., The Dalmarnock Fire Tests: Experiments and Modelling, University of Edinburgh: School of Engineering and Electronics, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. Abecassis-Empis, P. Reszka, A. Cowlard, H. Biteau, S. Welch, G. Rein and J. L. Torero, “Characterization of Dalmarnock Fire Test One,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1334–1343, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. G. Rein, J. L. Torero, W. Jajn, J. Stern-Gottfried, N. L. Ryder, S. Desanghere, M. Làzaro, F. Mowrer, A. Coles, D. Joyeux, D. Alvear, J. A. Capote, A. Jowsey, C. Abecassis-Empis and P. Reszka, “Round-Robin Study of a Prior Modelling Predictions of The Dalmarnock Fire Test One,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 590–602, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. E. Ronchi, E. D. Kuligowski, P. A. Reneke, R. D. Peacock and D. Nilsson, “The Process of Verification and Validation of Building Fire Evacuation Models,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. R. Galea, The Validation of Evacuation Models, CMS Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Kinsey, G. Walker, N. Swailes and N. Butterworth, “MassMotion: The Verification and Validation of MassMotion for Evacuation Modelling,” Arup, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  33. International Maritime Organization, “Guidelines for Evacuation Analysis for New and Existing Passenger Ships,” London, U.K., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  34. W. Radax and B. Rengs, “Prospects and Pitfalls of Statistical Testing: Insights from Replicating the Demographic Prisoner's Dilemma,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 1, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  35. International Standards Organization, “Fire Safety Engineering - Assessment, Verification and Validation of Calculation Methods,” Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. L. Best, “Tragedy in Kentucky,” Fire Journal, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 41–44, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. L. Bryan, “Human Behavior in the Westchase Hilton Hotel Fire,” Fire Journal, vol. 77, pp. 78–85, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Parke, S. M. V. Gwynne, E. R. Galea and P. Lawrence, “Validating the Building EXODUS Evacuation Model using Data from a Unannounced Trial Evacuation,” in Proceeding of the Second International Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, University of Greenwich, U.K., 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  39. S. Schmidt and E. Galea, Behaviour - Security - Culture Human Behaviour in Emergencies and Disasters: A Cross-Cultural Investigation, Pabst Science Publishers, 2013, p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. P. A. Loannidis, “Why Most Published Research Findings are False,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 696–701, August 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  41. I. I. Sandra, “Model's Validation for Complex Real-Time Systems,” Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Västerås, Sweden, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  42. E. R. Galea, L. Filippidis, S. Deere, R. Brown, I. Nicholls, Y. Hifi and N. Besnard, “The SAFEGUARD Validation Data-Set and Recommendations to IMO to Update MSC/Circ. 1238,” in Safeguard Passenger Evacuation Seminar, London, UK, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  43. R. D. Peacock, P. A. Reneke, W. D. Davis and W. W. Jones, “Quantifying Fire Model Evaluation using Functional Analysis,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 33, pp. 167–184, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. E. R. Galea, S. Deere, R. Brown and L. Filippidis, “An Experimental Validation of an Evacuation Model using Data Sets Generated from Two Large Passenger Ships,” in Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012, U. Weidmann, U. Kirsch and M. Schreckenberg, Eds., Springer International Publishing, 2013, pp. 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. M. Law, “How to Build Valid and Credible Simulation Models,” in Proceedings of the 2009 Winder Simulation Conference, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  46. D. A. Cook and J. A. Skinner, “How to Perform Credible Verification, Validation, and Accreditation for Modeling and Simulation,” The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, pp. 20–24, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Guidelines for Substantiating a Fire Model for a Given Application, Bethesda, Maryland, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Richiardi, R. Leombruni, N. Saam and M. Sonnessa, “A Common Protocol for Agent-Based Social Simulation,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9, no. 1, January 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  49. R. J. Malak and C. J. Paredis, “Foundations of Validating Reusable Behavioral Models in Engineering Design Problems,” in Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  50. O. Balci, R. E. Nance, J. D. Arthur and W. F. Ormsby, “Expanding our Horizons in Verification, Validation and Accreditation Research and Practice,” in Winter Simulation Conference, Blacksburg, VA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  51. R. G. Sargent, “Some Subjective Validation Methods using Graphical Displays of Data,” in Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  52. R. G. Sargent, “A Tutorial on Verification and Validation of Simulation Models,” in Proceedings of the 1984 Winter Simulation Conference, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  53. M. D. Petty, “Modeling and Validation Challenges for Complex Systems,” in The Proceedings of the Spring 2012 Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  54. G. Proulx, “Occupant Behavior and Evacuation during the Chicago Cook County Administration Building Fire,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 283–309, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. H. Jiang, S. M. V. Gwynne, E. Galea, P. Lawrence, F. Jia and I. H, “The Use of Evacuation Simulation, Fire Simulation and Experimental Fire Data in Forensic Fire Analysis,” in Second Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, University of Greenwich, U.K., 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  56. D. A. Purser, “Fire Safety and Evacuation Implications from Behaviours and Hazard Development in Two Fatal Care Home Incidents,” Fire and Materials, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 430–452, June 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. S. M. V. Gwynne and D. L. Boswell, “Pre-Evacuation Data Collected from a Mid-Rise Evacuation Exercise,” Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5–29, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. G. Proulx, “Lessons Learned On Occupants' Movement Times and Behaviour During Evacuation Drills,” in Proceedings from the Seventh International Interflam Conference, London, U.K., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  59. J. A. Kopec, P. Finès, D. G. Manuel, D. L. Buckeridge, W. M. Flanagan, J. Oderkirk, M. Abrahamowicz, S. Harper, B. Sharif, A. Okhmatovskaia, E. C. Sayre, M. M. Rahman and M. C. Wolfson, “Validation of Population-Based Disease Simulation Models: A Review of Concepts and Methods,” BMC Public Health, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  60. A. H. Feinstein and H. M. Cannon, “Fidelity, Verifiability, and Validity of Simulation: Constructs for Evaluation,” Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, vol. 28, pp. 57–67, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  61. E. McCrum-Gardner, “Which is the Correct Statistical Test to Use?,” British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 38–41, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. O. Balci and R. G. Sargent, “A Methodology for Cost-risk Analysis in the Statistical Validation of Simulation Models,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 190–197, 1 April 1981.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. W. Jahn, G. Rein and J. L. Torero, “The Effect of Model Parameters on the Simulation of Fire Dynamics,” Fire Safety Science, vol. 9, pp. 1341–1352, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Society of Fire Protection Engineers

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Society of Fire Protection Engineers. (2019). Egress Model Testing. In: SFPE Guide to Human Behavior in Fire. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94697-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94697-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94696-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94697-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics