Skip to main content

Design of a Learning Space Management System for Open and Adaptable School Facilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computers Supported Education (CSEDU 2017)

Abstract

In this design-based research project, a learning space management system was developed for the Valteri School Onerva in Central-Finland. The school represents a modern educational environment with open and adaptable learning spaces. The goal was to develop a software to support the stakeholders in organising flexible pedagogical activities and sharing pedagogical practices. To reach this goal, we utilised value-focused thinking as a requirements elicitation method, to identify the objectives that the stakeholders associate with the new environment. In the implementation phase, we organised participatory design workshops, to involve the stakeholders in decision-making, to ensure that the prototype development was proceeding according to their needs. As a result, we elaborate how we utilised value-focused thinking, what were the objectives that were identified, and how they were transformed into system requirements. Finally, we describe the first prototype of the learning space management system, which was developed using these requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Özen, A., Ergenekon, Y.: Activity-based intervention practices in special education. Educ. Sci.: Theor. Prac. 11, 359–362 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alessandrini, A., Cappelletti, A., Zancanaro, M.: Audio-augmented paper for therapy and educational intervention for children with autistic spectrum disorder. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 72, 422–430 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuhkala, A., Isomäki, H., Hartikainen, M., Cristea, A., Alessandrini, A.: Identifying objectives for a learning space management system with value-focused thinking. In: Escudeiro, P., Costagliola, G., Zvacek, S., Uhomoibhi, J., McLaren, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU). SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Porto (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pacheco, C., Garcia, I.: A systematic literature review of stakeholder identification methods in requirements elicitation. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 2171–2181 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G., Iversen, O.S.: In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 74, 93–106 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Keeney, R.L.: Value-Focused Thinking: a Path to Creative Decision Making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sanoff, H., Walden, R.: School environments. In: The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, pp. 276–294 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kok, H.B., Mobach, M.P., Omta, O.S.: The added value of facility management in the educational environment. J. Facil. Manag. 9, 249–265 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumpulainen, K., Rajala, A.: Negotiating time-space contexts in students’ technology-mediated interaction during a collaborative learning activity. Int. J. Educ. Res. 84, 55–57 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Todhunter, B.J.: An examination of the views of key stakeholders on the development of learning spaces at a regional university. J. Facil. Manag. 13, 204–222 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keppell, M., Riddle, M.: Distributed learning spaces: physical, blended and virtual learning spaces in higher education. In: Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces in Higher Education, pp. 1–20. IGI Global (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lievonen, M., Kinnunen, P.: Main features of an ideal learning space: a user-based description. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Architectural Research Symposium in Finland, p. 8 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumpulainen, K., Mikkola, A.: Researching learning across space and time in extended learning environments. In: PersPectives from Finland - Towards New Learning Environments, pp. 9–22. Juvenes Print - Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuuskorpi, M.: Future physical learning environment. User oriented flexible and changeable teaching spaces. Dissertation, University of Turku (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nevari, J.: Oivaltamo: avautuva oppimistila. Ph.D. thesis, Lahti University of Applied Sciences (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barki, H., Hartwick, J.: Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Q. 18, 59–82 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He, J., King, W.R.: The role of user participation in information systems development: implications from a meta-analysis. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 25, 301–331 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahmood, A.M., Burn, J., Gemoets, L., Jacquez, C.: Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 52, 751–771 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris, M.A., Weistroffer, H.R.: A new look at the relationship between user involvement in systems development and system success. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 739–756 (2009). Article 42

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abelein, U., Paech, B.: Understanding the influence of user participation and involvement on system success - a systematic mapping study. Empirical Softw. Eng. 20, 28–81 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McGill, T., Klobas, J.: User developed application success: sources and effects of involvement. Behav. Inf. Technol. 27, 407–422 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Iivari, J., Isomäki, H., Pekkola, S.: The user - the great unknown of systems development: reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement. Inf. Syst. J. 20, 109–117 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kujala, S.: User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav. Inf. Technol. 22, 1–16 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Spinuzzi, C.: The methodology of participatory design. Tech. Commun. 52, 163–174 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bjerknes, G., Bratteteig, T.: User participation and democracy: a discussion of Scandinavian research on system development. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 7, 73–98 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ehn, P.: Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Ph.D. thesis, Umeå Universitat (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Halskov, K., Hansen, N.B.: The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 74, 81–92 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Muller, M.J., Kuhn, S.: Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36, 24–28 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanders, E.B.N., Brandt, E., Binder, T.: A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, PDC 2010, p. 195. ACM Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sanoff, H.: Special issue on participatory design. Des. Stud. 28, 213–215 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Ståhlbrost, A.: Participatory design: one step back or two steps forward? In: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design, vol. 2008, pp. 102–111 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Benton, L., Vasalou, A., Khaled, R., Johnson, H., Gooch, D.: Diversity for design. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2014, pp. 3747–3756. ACM Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Keay-Bright, W.: Designing technology for children with special needs: bridging perspectives through participatory design. CoDesign 7, 1–28 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Guha, M.L., Druin, A., Fails, J.A.: Designing with and for children with special needs. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC 2008, p. 61. ACM Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Malinverni, L., MoraGuiard, J., Padillo, V., Mairena, M.a., Hervás, A., Pares, N.: Participatory design strategies to enhance the creative contribution of children with special needs. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC 2014, pp. 85–94. ACM Press, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Parnell, G.S., Hughes, D.W., Burk, R.C., Driscoll, P.J., Kucik, P.D., Morales, B.L., Nunn, L.R.: Invited review-survey of value-focused thinking: applications, research developments and areas for future research. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 20, 49–60 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Williams, R.M.: Change and stability in values and value systems: a sociological perspective. Underst. Hum. Values: Individ. Societal Values 1, 5–46 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Friedman, B.: Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3, 16–23 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schwartz, S.H.: Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 25, 1–65 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Keeney, R.L.: Value-focused thinking: identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 92, 537–549 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Keeney, R.L.: Identifying, prioritizing, and using multiple objectives. EURO J. Decis. Process. 1, 45–67 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sheng, H., Nah, F., Siau, K.: Strategic implications of mobile technology: a case study using value-focused thinking. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 14, 269–290 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sheng, H., Siau, K., Nah, F.F.H.: Understanding the values of mobile technology in education. ACM SIGMIS Database 41, 25 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13, 3–21 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Morse, J.M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., Spiers, J.: Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 1, 13–22 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cockton, G.: Value-centred HCI. In: Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - NordiCHI 2004, pp. 149–160. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cockton, G.: Designing worth is worth designing. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Changing Roles - NordiCHI 2006, Number October, pp. 165–174. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schwartz, S.H.: An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings Psychol. Culture 2, 1–20 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Isomursu, M., Ervasti, M., Kinnula, M., Isomursu, P.: Understanding human values in adopting new technology - a case study and methodological discussion. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 69, 183–200 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Iversen, O.S., Halskov, K., Leong, T.W.: Values-led participatory design. CoDesign 8, 87–103 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Isomäki, H.: The human modes of being in investigating user experience. In: Isomäki, H., Saariluoma, P. (eds.) Future Interaction Design II, pp. 191–207. Springer, London (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the Valteri School Onerva’s personnel for participating in the research project. We also thank Kirsi Heinonen, M.Sc., for assisting in the data collection. This research has been funded by the Valteri School Onerva and the University of Jyvaskyla, Faculty of Information Technology, under the projects entitled ONSPACE and ONSPACE2. The research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ari Tuhkala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tuhkala, A., Isomäki, H., Hartikainen, M., Cristea, A., Alessandrini, A. (2018). Design of a Learning Space Management System for Open and Adaptable School Facilities. In: Escudeiro, P., Costagliola, G., Zvacek, S., Uhomoibhi, J., McLaren, B. (eds) Computers Supported Education. CSEDU 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 865. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94640-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94640-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94639-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94640-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics