Abstract
In this design-based research project, a learning space management system was developed for the Valteri School Onerva in Central-Finland. The school represents a modern educational environment with open and adaptable learning spaces. The goal was to develop a software to support the stakeholders in organising flexible pedagogical activities and sharing pedagogical practices. To reach this goal, we utilised value-focused thinking as a requirements elicitation method, to identify the objectives that the stakeholders associate with the new environment. In the implementation phase, we organised participatory design workshops, to involve the stakeholders in decision-making, to ensure that the prototype development was proceeding according to their needs. As a result, we elaborate how we utilised value-focused thinking, what were the objectives that were identified, and how they were transformed into system requirements. Finally, we describe the first prototype of the learning space management system, which was developed using these requirements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Özen, A., Ergenekon, Y.: Activity-based intervention practices in special education. Educ. Sci.: Theor. Prac. 11, 359–362 (2011)
Alessandrini, A., Cappelletti, A., Zancanaro, M.: Audio-augmented paper for therapy and educational intervention for children with autistic spectrum disorder. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 72, 422–430 (2014)
Tuhkala, A., Isomäki, H., Hartikainen, M., Cristea, A., Alessandrini, A.: Identifying objectives for a learning space management system with value-focused thinking. In: Escudeiro, P., Costagliola, G., Zvacek, S., Uhomoibhi, J., McLaren, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU). SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Porto (2016)
Pacheco, C., Garcia, I.: A systematic literature review of stakeholder identification methods in requirements elicitation. J. Syst. Softw. 85, 2171–2181 (2012)
Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G., Iversen, O.S.: In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 74, 93–106 (2015)
Keeney, R.L.: Value-Focused Thinking: a Path to Creative Decision Making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1992)
Sanoff, H., Walden, R.: School environments. In: The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, pp. 276–294 (2012)
Kok, H.B., Mobach, M.P., Omta, O.S.: The added value of facility management in the educational environment. J. Facil. Manag. 9, 249–265 (2011)
Kumpulainen, K., Rajala, A.: Negotiating time-space contexts in students’ technology-mediated interaction during a collaborative learning activity. Int. J. Educ. Res. 84, 55–57 (2015)
Todhunter, B.J.: An examination of the views of key stakeholders on the development of learning spaces at a regional university. J. Facil. Manag. 13, 204–222 (2015)
Keppell, M., Riddle, M.: Distributed learning spaces: physical, blended and virtual learning spaces in higher education. In: Physical and Virtual Learning Spaces in Higher Education, pp. 1–20. IGI Global (2012)
Lievonen, M., Kinnunen, P.: Main features of an ideal learning space: a user-based description. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Architectural Research Symposium in Finland, p. 8 (2014)
Kumpulainen, K., Mikkola, A.: Researching learning across space and time in extended learning environments. In: PersPectives from Finland - Towards New Learning Environments, pp. 9–22. Juvenes Print - Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy (2014)
Kuuskorpi, M.: Future physical learning environment. User oriented flexible and changeable teaching spaces. Dissertation, University of Turku (2012)
Nevari, J.: Oivaltamo: avautuva oppimistila. Ph.D. thesis, Lahti University of Applied Sciences (2013)
Barki, H., Hartwick, J.: Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Q. 18, 59–82 (1994)
He, J., King, W.R.: The role of user participation in information systems development: implications from a meta-analysis. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 25, 301–331 (2008)
Mahmood, A.M., Burn, J., Gemoets, L., Jacquez, C.: Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 52, 751–771 (2000)
Harris, M.A., Weistroffer, H.R.: A new look at the relationship between user involvement in systems development and system success. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24, 739–756 (2009). Article 42
Abelein, U., Paech, B.: Understanding the influence of user participation and involvement on system success - a systematic mapping study. Empirical Softw. Eng. 20, 28–81 (2015)
McGill, T., Klobas, J.: User developed application success: sources and effects of involvement. Behav. Inf. Technol. 27, 407–422 (2008)
Iivari, J., Isomäki, H., Pekkola, S.: The user - the great unknown of systems development: reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement. Inf. Syst. J. 20, 109–117 (2010)
Kujala, S.: User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav. Inf. Technol. 22, 1–16 (2003)
Spinuzzi, C.: The methodology of participatory design. Tech. Commun. 52, 163–174 (2005)
Bjerknes, G., Bratteteig, T.: User participation and democracy: a discussion of Scandinavian research on system development. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 7, 73–98 (1995)
Ehn, P.: Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Ph.D. thesis, Umeå Universitat (1988)
Halskov, K., Hansen, N.B.: The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 74, 81–92 (2015)
Muller, M.J., Kuhn, S.: Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36, 24–28 (1993)
Sanders, E.B.N., Brandt, E., Binder, T.: A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, PDC 2010, p. 195. ACM Press, New York (2010)
Sanoff, H.: Special issue on participatory design. Des. Stud. 28, 213–215 (2007)
Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Ståhlbrost, A.: Participatory design: one step back or two steps forward? In: Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design, vol. 2008, pp. 102–111 (2008)
Benton, L., Vasalou, A., Khaled, R., Johnson, H., Gooch, D.: Diversity for design. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2014, pp. 3747–3756. ACM Press, New York (2014)
Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Keay-Bright, W.: Designing technology for children with special needs: bridging perspectives through participatory design. CoDesign 7, 1–28 (2011)
Guha, M.L., Druin, A., Fails, J.A.: Designing with and for children with special needs. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC 2008, p. 61. ACM Press, New York (2008)
Malinverni, L., MoraGuiard, J., Padillo, V., Mairena, M.a., Hervás, A., Pares, N.: Participatory design strategies to enhance the creative contribution of children with special needs. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children - IDC 2014, pp. 85–94. ACM Press, New York (2014)
Parnell, G.S., Hughes, D.W., Burk, R.C., Driscoll, P.J., Kucik, P.D., Morales, B.L., Nunn, L.R.: Invited review-survey of value-focused thinking: applications, research developments and areas for future research. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 20, 49–60 (2013)
Williams, R.M.: Change and stability in values and value systems: a sociological perspective. Underst. Hum. Values: Individ. Societal Values 1, 5–46 (1979)
Friedman, B.: Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3, 16–23 (1996)
Schwartz, S.H.: Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 25, 1–65 (1992)
Keeney, R.L.: Value-focused thinking: identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 92, 537–549 (1996)
Keeney, R.L.: Identifying, prioritizing, and using multiple objectives. EURO J. Decis. Process. 1, 45–67 (2013)
Sheng, H., Nah, F., Siau, K.: Strategic implications of mobile technology: a case study using value-focused thinking. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 14, 269–290 (2005)
Sheng, H., Siau, K., Nah, F.F.H.: Understanding the values of mobile technology in education. ACM SIGMIS Database 41, 25 (2010)
Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13, 3–21 (1990)
Morse, J.M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., Spiers, J.: Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 1, 13–22 (2002)
Cockton, G.: Value-centred HCI. In: Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - NordiCHI 2004, pp. 149–160. ACM Press, New York (2004)
Cockton, G.: Designing worth is worth designing. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Changing Roles - NordiCHI 2006, Number October, pp. 165–174. ACM Press, New York (2006)
Schwartz, S.H.: An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings Psychol. Culture 2, 1–20 (2012)
Isomursu, M., Ervasti, M., Kinnula, M., Isomursu, P.: Understanding human values in adopting new technology - a case study and methodological discussion. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 69, 183–200 (2011)
Iversen, O.S., Halskov, K., Leong, T.W.: Values-led participatory design. CoDesign 8, 87–103 (2012)
Isomäki, H.: The human modes of being in investigating user experience. In: Isomäki, H., Saariluoma, P. (eds.) Future Interaction Design II, pp. 191–207. Springer, London (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_10
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the Valteri School Onerva’s personnel for participating in the research project. We also thank Kirsi Heinonen, M.Sc., for assisting in the data collection. This research has been funded by the Valteri School Onerva and the University of Jyvaskyla, Faculty of Information Technology, under the projects entitled ONSPACE and ONSPACE2. The research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tuhkala, A., Isomäki, H., Hartikainen, M., Cristea, A., Alessandrini, A. (2018). Design of a Learning Space Management System for Open and Adaptable School Facilities. In: Escudeiro, P., Costagliola, G., Zvacek, S., Uhomoibhi, J., McLaren, B. (eds) Computers Supported Education. CSEDU 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 865. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94640-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94640-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94639-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94640-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)