Advertisement

Observations and Reflections on Teaching Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses

  • Ottar L. OsenEmail author
  • Robin T. Bye
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 865)

Abstract

In this article, we make a number of observations and reflections based on our experience from many years of teaching courses in electrical and computer engineering bachelor programmes. We present important aspects of attendance, lectures, group work, and compulsory coursework, and how these can be addressed to improve student learning. Moreover, we discuss how to facilitate active learning activities, focussing on simple in-classroom activities and larger problem-based activities such as assignments, projects, and laboratory work, and highlight solving real-world problems by means of practical application of relevant theory as key to achieving intended learning outcomes. Our observations and reflections are then put into a theoretical context, including students’ approaches of learning, constructive alignment, active learning, and problem-based versus problem-solving learning. Next, we present and discuss the results from two recent student evaluation surveys, one for senior (final-year) students and one for junior (first- and second-year) students, and draw some conclusions. Finally, we add some remarks regarding our findings and point to future work.

Keywords

Active learning Problem-solving learning Assessment Engineering pedagogy and didactics Constructive alignment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Software and Intelligent Control (SoftICE) Laboratory is grateful for the financial support given by the Study Committee at NTNU in Ålesund through the educational research project Research-Based and Innovation-Driven Learning (FILA), grant no. 70440500.

References

  1. 1.
    Osen, O.L., Bye, R.T.: Reflections on teaching electrical and computer engineering courses at the bachelor level. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU (CSEDU 2017), pp. 57–68. INSTICC, SCITEPRESS (2017). Selected for Extended Publication in Springer Book Series Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Durden, G.C., Ellis, L.V.: The effects of attendance on student learning in principles of economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 85, 343–346 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Romer, D.: Do students go to class? Should they? J. Econ. Perspecti. 7, 167–174 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marburger, D.R.: Absenteeism and undergraduate exam performance. J. Econ. Educ. 32, 99–109 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marburger, D.R.: Does mandatory attendance improve student performance? J. Econ. Educ. 37, 148–155 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sotto, E.: When Teaching Becomes Learning: A Theory and Practice of Teaching. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bligh, D.A.: What’s the Use of Lectures?. Intellect Books, Bristol (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    van der Meer, A.L., van der Weel, F.R.: Only three fingers write, but the whole brain works: a high-density EEG study showing advantages of drawing over typing for learning. Front. Psychol. 8, 706 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson, J.R.: Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 8th edn. Worth Publishers, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clark, R.C., Nguyen, F., Sweller, J.: Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Westermann, K., Rummel, N.: Delaying instruction: evidence from a study in a university relearning setting. Instr. Sci. 40, 673–689 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Forsyth, D.R.: Group Dynamics. Cengage Learning, Boston (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pfaff, E., Huddleston, P.: Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. J. Mark. Educ. 25, 37–45 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chatman, J.A., Flynn, F.J.: The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Acad. Manag. J. 44, 956–974 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joyce, W.B.: On the free-rider problem in cooperative learning. J. Educ. Bus. 74, 271–274 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gynnild, V.: Læringsorientert eller eksamensfokusert? Nærstudier av pedagogisk utviklingsarbeid i sivilingeniørstudiet. Ph.D. thesis, NTNU (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marton, F.: Phenomenography – describing conceptions of the world around us. Instr. Sci. 10, 177–200 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., Dochy, F.: Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educ. Res. Rev. 5, 243–260 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marton, F., Booth, S.: Learning and Awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwaw (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prosser, M., Trigwell, K.: Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Society for Research in Higher Education and/Open University Press, Buckingham (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Case, J., Marshall, D.: Between deep and surface: procedural approaches to learning in engineering education contexts. Stud. High. Educ. 29, 605–615 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Entwistle, N., Ramsden, P.: Understanding Student Learning. Croom Helm, Beckenham (1983)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Entwistle, N., Ramsden, P.: Understanding Student Learning (Routledge Revivals). Routledge, Abingdon (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saeljo, R.: Learning in the Learner’s Perspective 1. Some Commonsense Conceptions. Report no 76, Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg (1979)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., Beaty, E.: Conceptions of learning. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 16, 457–474 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marshall, D., Summers, M., Woolnough, B.: Students’ conceptions of learning in an engineering context. High. Educ. 38, 291–309 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Biggs, J., Tang, C.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 4th edn. McGraw Hill/Open University Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Felder, R.M., Brent, R.: Understanding student differences. J. Eng. Educ. 94, 57–72 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lan, W.: The effects of self-monitoring on students’ course performance, use of learning strategies, attitude, self-judgment ability, and knowledge representation. J. Exp. Educ. 64, 101–116 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Borkowski, J., Thorpe, P.: Self-regulation and motivation: a life-span perspective on underachievement. In: Schunk, D., Zimmermann, B. (eds.) Self-regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues of Educational Applications, pp. 44–73. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1994)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gynnild, V., Holstad, A., Myrhaug, D.: Identifying and promoting self-regulated learning in higher education: roles and responsibilities of student tutors. Mentor. Tutoring: Partnersh. Learn. 16, 147–161 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane-Dick, D.: Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud. High. Educ. 31, 199–218 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gynnild, V., Holstad, A., Myrhaug, D.: Teaching as coaching: a case study of awareness and learning in engineering education. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 29, 1–17 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bye, R.T.: The teacher as a facilitator for learning: flipped classroom in a master’s course on artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education – Volume 1: CSEDU, pp. 184–195. INSTICC, SCITEPRESS (2017)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Prince, M.J.: Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223–231 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Andersen, H.L.: “Constructive alignment” og risikoen for en forsimplende universitetspædagogik. Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift 5 (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schroeder, C., Scott, T.P., Tolson, H., Huang, T.Y., Lee, Y.H.: A meta-analysis of national research: effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 44, 1436–1460 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M.P.: Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 111, 8410–8415 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Foldnes, N.: The flipped classroom and cooperative learning: evidence from a randomised experiment. Act. Learn. High Educ. 17, 39–49 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bowen, C.W.: A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. J. Chem. Educ. 77, 116 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., Smith, K.A.: Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. Interaction Book Co., Edina (1998)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Springer, L., Stanne, M., Donovan, S.: Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: a meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 69, 21–52 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hattie, J., Goveia, I.C.: Synlig læring: et sammendrag av mer enn 800 metaanalyser av skoleprestasjoner. Cappelen Damm akademisk (2013)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schaathun, W.A., Schaathun, H.G., Bye, R.T.: Aktiv læring i mikrokontrollarar. Uniped 38, 381–389 (2015). Special issue following MNT-konferansen, Bergen, Norway, 18–19 March 2015Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Software and Intelligent Control Engineering Laboratory, Department of ICT and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical EngineeringNTNU—Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyÅlesundNorway

Personalised recommendations