Advertisement

Uncovering Failures of Game Design for Educational Content (and How to Fix Them)

  • Kay BerklingEmail author
  • Heiko Faller
  • Micha Piertzik
  • Wolmet Barendregt
  • Laura Benton
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 865)

Abstract

More than 800 users from a cross-section of ages and gender were asked about the games they play and what motivates them to play these. The answers were cross-matched with game features. Based on this match and subjective answers of those surveyed, a pattern emerges for the essential ingredients of addictive games across these demographics, as well as an anti-pattern. With the derived pattern and anti-pattern several games and real-world scenarios can be designed and existing ones analyzed. Examples show how the pattern or anti-pattern can be applied and elucidate which key ingredients tend to be missing.

Keywords

Games Content Design Addiction Education Gamification Analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Barendregt, W., Lindström, B., Rietz-Leppänen, E., Holgersson, I., Ottosson, T.: Development and evaluation of fingu: A mathematics ipad game using multi-touch interaction. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children. pp. 204–207. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berkling, K.: Connecting peer reviews with students’ motivation - onboarding, motivation and blended learning. In: Helfert, M., Restivo, M.T., Zvacek, S., Uhomoibhi, J.O. (eds.) CSEDU 2015 - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Volume 2, Lisbon, Portugal, 23–25 May, 2015. pp. 24–33. SciTePress (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berkling, K., Faller, H., Piertzik, M.: Avoiding failure in modern game design with academic content - A recipe, an anti-pattern and applications thereof. In: Escudeiro, P., Costagliola, G., Zvacek, S., Uhomoibhi, J.O., McLaren, B.M. (eds.) CSEDU 2017 - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Volume 2, Porto, Portugal, April 21–23, 2017. pp. 25–36. SciTePress (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berkling, K., Pflaumer, N.: Phontasia - a phonics trainer for German spelling in primary education Singapore, September 19, 2014. In: Berkling, K., Giuliani, D., Potamianos, A. (eds.) The 4st Workshop on Child, Computer and Interaction, WOCCI 2014, Singapore, September 19, 2014. pp. 33–38. ISCA (2014), http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/wocci_2014/wc14_033.html
  5. 5.
    Berkling, K., Pflaumer, N., Lavalley, R.: German phonics game using speech synthesis - a longitudinal study about the effect on orthography skills Education, SLaTE 2015, Leipzig, Germany, September 4–5, 2015. In: Workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education. SLaTE, vol. 6, pp. 167–172. ISCA(ISCA) International Speech Communication Association (2015). http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/slate_2015/sl15_167.html
  6. 6.
    Berkling, K., Thomas, C.: Gamification of a software engineering course and a detailed analysis of the factors that lead to it’s failure. In: Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2013 International Conference on. pp. 525–530. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berkling, K., Zundel, A.: Change management: overcoming the challenges of introducing self-driven learning. iJEP 5(4), 38–46 (2015). http://www.online-journals.org/index.php/i-jep/article/view/4945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bianco, A.T., Higgins, E.T., Klem, A.: How fun/importance fit affects performance: relating implicit theories to instructions. Pers. Soci. Psychol. Bull. 29(9), 1091–1103 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyle, E.A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T.M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., Lim, T., Ninaus, M., Ribeiro, C., Pereira, J.: An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Comput. Educ. 94, 178–192 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Campbell, I.: Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Stat. Med. 26(19), 3661–3675 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., Angelova, G.: Gamification in Education: a systematic mapping Study. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18(3), 75–88 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickey, M.D.: K-12 teachers encounter digital games: a qualitative investigation of teachers’ perceptions of the potential of digital games for K-12 education. Interact. Learn. Environ. 23(4), 485–495 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J.H., Tosca, S.P.: Understanding video Games: The Essential Introduction, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hanus, M.D., Fox, J.: Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: a longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Comput. Educ. 80, 152–161 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holgersson, I., Barendregt, W., Rietz, E., Ottosson, T., Lindström, B.: Can children enhance their arithmetic competence by playing a specially designed computer game? Cursiv, DK, 18, 177–188. Institut for Didaktik, Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsskole, Aarhus Universitet (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koivisto, J., Hamari, J.: Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Comput. Hum. Behav. 35, 179–188 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koster, R.: A Theory of Fun for Game Design, 2nd edn. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Malone, T.W., Lepper, M.R.: Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude Learn. Instr. 3(1987), 223–253 (1987)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naaji, A., Mustea, A., Holotescu, C., Herman, C.: How to mix the ingredients for a blended course recipe. BRAIN Broad Res. Artif. Intell. Neurosci. 6(1–2), 106–116 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neuman, D.: The Origin of Arithmetic Skills: A Phenomenographic Approach (1987)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nicholson, S.: A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L.C. (eds.) Gamification in Education and Business, pp. 1–20. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Novak, E., Johnson, T.E., Tenenbaum, G., Shute, V.J.: Effects of an instructional gaming characteristic on learning effectiveness, efficiency, and engagement: using a storyline for teaching basic statistical skills. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(3), 523–538 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ryan, D.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 54–67 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salen, K.: Quest to Learn: Developing the School for Digital Kids. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation reports on digital media and learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schuler, H., Funke, U., Baron-Boldt, J.: Predictive Validity of school grades-a meta-analysis. Appl. Psychol. 39(1), 89–103 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Sousa Borges, S., Durelli, V.H.S., Reis, H.M., Isotani, S.: A systematic mapping on gamification applied to education. In: Cho, Y., Shin, S.Y., Kim, S., Hung, C.C., Hong, J. (eds.) the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 216–222 (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Squire, K.: From content to context: videogames as designed experience. Educ. Researcher 35(8), 19–29 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stott, A., Neustaedter, C.: Analysis of gamification in education. Surrey, BC, Canada 8 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suarez Caraballo, L.M.: Using online mathematics skills games to promote automaticity. Ph.D. thesis, Cleveland State University (01012014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Hirn, J.O.W., Schuler, H.: Meta-analysis of the relationship between the big five and academic success at university. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/J. Psychol. 215(2), 132–151 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Weigand, S., Schuler, H.: Die Validität von Schulnoten zur Vorhersage des Studienerfolgs - eine Metaanalyse 1Dieser Beitrag entstand im Kontext des Projekts “Eignungsdiagnostische Auswahl von Studierenden”, das im Rahmen des Aktionsprogramms “StudierendenAuswahl” des Stifterverbands für die Deutsche Wissenschaft und der Landesstiftung Baden-Württemberg durchgeführt wird. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 21(1), 11–27 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vallerand, R.J., Gauvin, L.I., Halliwell, W.R.: Negative effects of competition on children’s intrinsic motivation. J. Soc. Psychol. 126(5), 649–656 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vaz de Carvalho, C., Escudeiro, P., Coelho, A. (eds.): SGAMES 2016. LNICST, vol. 176. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51055-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wiggins, B.E.: An overview and study on the use of games, simulations, and gamification in higher education. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. 6(1), 18–29 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kay Berkling
    • 1
    Email author
  • Heiko Faller
    • 1
  • Micha Piertzik
    • 1
  • Wolmet Barendregt
    • 2
  • Laura Benton
    • 3
  1. 1.Computer ScienceCooperative State University of Baden WürttembergKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Divison of Learning Communication and ICTUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.UCL Institute of Education, UCL Knowledge LabUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations