Skip to main content

Further Closure Properties of Input-Driven Pushdown Automata

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems (DCFS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10952))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper investigates the closure of the language family defined by input-driven pushdown automata (IDPDA) under the following operations: insertion \(ins(L, K)=\{xyz \mid xz \in L, \, y \in K\}\), deletion \(del(L, K)=\{xz \mid xyz \in L, \, y \in K\}\), square root \(\sqrt{L}=\{w \mid ww \in L\}\), and the first half \(\frac{1}{2}L=\{u \mid \exists v: |u|=|v|, \, uv \in L\}\). For K and L recognized by nondeterministic IDPDA, with m and with n states, respectively, insertion requires \(mn+2m\) states, as long as K is well-nested; deletion is representable with 2n states, for well-nested K; square root requires \(n^3-O(n^2)\) states, for well-nested L; the well-nested subset of the first half is representable with \(2^{O(n^2)}\) states. Without the well-nestedness constraints, non-closure is established in each case.

A. Okhotin—Supported by Russian Science Foundation, project 18-11-00100.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alur, R., Madhusudan, P.: Visibly pushdown languages. In: ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2004), Chicago, USA, 13–16 June 2004, pp. 202–211 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1007352.1007390

  2. Alur, R., Madhusudan, P.: Adding nesting structure to words. J. ACM 56(3) (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1516512.1516518

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. von Braunmühl, B., Verbeek, R.: Input driven languages are recognized in \(\log n\) space. Ann. Discret. Math. 24, 1–20 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(08)73072-X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Domaratzki, M.: State complexity of proportional removals. J. Autom. Lang. Comb. 7(4), 455–468 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Esparza, J., Ganty, P., Kiefer, S., Luttenberger, M.: Parikh’s theorem: a simple and direct automaton construction. Inf. Process. Lett. 111(12), 614–619 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2011.03.019

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Goč, D., Palioudakis, A., Salomaa, K.: Nondeterministic state complexity of proportional removals. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 25(7), 823–836 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129054114400103

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Haines, L.H.: On free monoids partially ordered by embedding. J. Comb. Theory 6, 94–98 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9800(69)80111-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Han, Y.-S., Ko, S.-K., Ng, T., Salomaa, K.: State complexity of insertion. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 27(7), 863–878 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129054116500349

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Han, Y.-S., Ko, S.-K., Salomaa, K.: State complexity of deletion and bipolar deletion. Acta Informatica 53(1), 67–85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00236-015-0245-y

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Han, Y.-S., Salomaa, K.: Nondeterministic state complexity of nested word automata. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410, 2961–2971 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2009.01.004

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Higman, G.: Ordering by divisibility in abstract algebras. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s3–2(1), 326–336 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Gruber, H., Holzer, M., Kutrib, M.: More on the size of Higman-Haines sets: effective constructions. Fundamenta Informaticae 91(1), 105–121 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2009-0035

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Karandikar, P., Niewerth, M., Schnoebelen, Ph.: On the state complexity of closures and interiors of regular languages with subwords and superwords. Theor. Comput. Sci. 610(A), 91–107 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2015.09.028

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. van Leeuven, J.: Effective construction in well-partially-ordered free monoids. Discrete Math. 21(3), 237–252 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(78)90156-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Maslov, A.N.: Estimates of the number of states of finite automata. Soviet Math. Dokl. 11, 1373–1375 (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehlhorn, K.: Pebbling mountain ranges and its application to DCFL-recognition. In: de Bakker, J., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 1980. LNCS, vol. 85, pp. 422–435. Springer, Heidelberg (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-10003-2_89

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Okhotin, A.: On the state complexity of scattered substrings and superstrings. Fundamenta Informaticae 99(3), 325–338 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2010-252

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Okhotin, A.: Input-driven languages are linear conjunctive. Theor. Comput. Sci. 618, 52–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2016.01.007

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: Complexity of input-driven pushdown automata. SIGACT News 45(2), 47–67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2636805.2636821

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: Descriptional complexity of unambiguous input-driven pushdown automata. Theor. Comput. Sci. 566, 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2014.11.015

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: State complexity of operations on input-driven pushdown automata. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 86, 207–228 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2017.02.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: Edit distance neighbourhoods of input-driven pushdown automata. In: Weil, P. (ed.) CSR 2017. LNCS, vol. 10304, pp. 260–272. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58747-9_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K.: The quotient operation on input-driven pushdown automata. In: Pighizzini, G., Câmpeanu, C. (eds.) DCFS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10316, pp. 299–310. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60252-3_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Piao, X., Salomaa, K.: Operational state complexity of nested word automata. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410, 3290–3302 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2009.05.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Salomaa, K.: Limitations of lower bound methods for deterministic nested word automata. Inf. Comput. 209, 580–589 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2010.11.021

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Seiferas, J.I., McNaughton, R.: Regularity-preserving relations. Theor. Comput. Sci. 2(2), 147–154 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(76)90030-X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Salomaa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Okhotin, A., Salomaa, K. (2018). Further Closure Properties of Input-Driven Pushdown Automata. In: Konstantinidis, S., Pighizzini, G. (eds) Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems. DCFS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10952. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94631-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94631-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94630-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94631-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics