Advertisement

Comparison Among Standard Method, Dedicated Toolbox and Kinematic-Based Approach in Assessing Risk of Developing Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders

  • Stefano Elio LenziEmail author
  • Carlo Emilio Standoli
  • Giuseppe Andreoni
  • Paolo Perego
  • Nicola Francesco Lopomo
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 795)

Abstract

OCRA (Occupational Repetitive Action) index is one of the most used method for supporting risk assessment in tasks requiring manual handling of low loads at high frequency. One of the main drawbacks of this method is that the operator analyses the activities by observing videos. This kind of procedure is inherently not objective and operator-dependent. To overcome these limitations, we developed a toolbox to support the analysis with contextual noting and wearable sensors kinematic data. Three expert operators were asked to evaluate seven videos with and without the aid of the developed toolbox. Results underlined a high inter (R2 mean 0.4) and intra-operator variability (posture time percentage and technical actions (TAs) count mean errors respectively 7.44%, 4 TAs) when using the only video-based approaches. On the contrary, research outcomes showed that the introduction of wearable device allow to overcome these issues and to reduce noticeably the evaluation time (−98%).

Keywords

Occupational ergonomics Wearable systems Upper limb musculoskeletal disorders Movement analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    ISO 11228:2007(E). Ergonomics - Manual handling, 01 April 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colombini, D., Occhipinti, E.: L’Analisi e la gestione del rischio nel lavoro manuale ripetitivo: Manuale per l’uso del sistema OCRA per la gestione del rischio da sovraccarico biomeccanico in lavori semplici e complessi. Franco Angeli, Milano (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McAtamney, L., Corlett, E.N.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of world-related upper limb disorders. Appl. Ergon. 24, 91–99 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spielholz, P., Silverstein, B., Morgan, M., Checkoway, H., Kaufman, J.: Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors. Ergonomics 44(6), 588–613 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    David, G.C.: Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup. Med. 55(3), 190–199 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Elio Lenzi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlo Emilio Standoli
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Andreoni
    • 2
  • Paolo Perego
    • 2
  • Nicola Francesco Lopomo
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’InformazioneUniversità degli Studi di BresciaBresciaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di DesignPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations