Advertisement

A Framework to Evaluate Semiotic Interoperability for Information Sharing

  • Shixiong LiuEmail author
  • Weizi Li
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 527)

Abstract

Interoperability is the ability of entities in organisation to work together that covers aspects ranging from the technical to the business level. Over the last decades, the interoperability concept and its context have been changing rapidly. It expands from the largely IT-focused area to business-focused area. The evaluation of interoperability is a rising concern in various research domains. There is increasing number of researchers that have been started concentrating on not just digital aspects, but also business related, human related, and social environment related aspects. Our previous investigation reveals in that interoperability issues from those perspectives are becoming a rising concern. When we study information sharing and business collaboration within organisations, the business activities and operations in organisation, which directly affect business performance, are driven by business processes. Therefore, the interoperability between business processes is the key to information sharing assurance. This paper proposes a framework from a new perspective - semiotics perspective, for enhancing interoperability evaluation. The framework derives from a feasibility study that investigates interoperability barriers in organisation. The framework offers the capabilities of analysing, measuring, and assessing the interoperability between business processes.

Keywords

Interoperability evaluation Semiotic interoperability Information sharing Business process 

References

  1. Barbarito, F., Pinciroli, F., Mason, J., Marceglia, S., Mazzola, L., Bonacina, S.: Implementing standards for the interoperability among healthcare providers in the public regionalized healthcare information system of the Lombardy region. J. Biomed. Inform. 45(4), 736–745 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2012.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boonstra, A., Broekhuis, M., Van Offenbeek, M., Wortmann, H.: Strategic alternatives in telecare design: developing a value-configuration-based alignment framework. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 20(2), 198–214 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, D., Doumeingts, G., Vernadat, F.: Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: past, present and future. Comput. Ind. 59(7), 647–659 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.12.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clabby, J.: Web Services Explained: Solutions and Applications for the Real World. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2003)Google Scholar
  5. EN/ISO I9439: Enterprise integration—framework for enterprise modelling. Work report (2003)Google Scholar
  6. Gazendam, H., Liu, K.: The evolution of organisational semiotics: a brief review of the contribution of Ronald Stamper. In: Studies in Organisational Semiotics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Gregory, S., Dixon, A., Ham, C.: Health policy under the coalition government: a mid-term assessment Editors. The King’s Fund (2012)Google Scholar
  8. Kaye, D.: Loosely Coupled: The Missing Pieces of Web Services. RDS Press, RDS Strategies LLC, Marin County (2003)Google Scholar
  9. Li, W.: The architecture and implementation of digital hospital - information system integration for seamless business process. Ph.D. thesis. Univerity of Reading (2010)Google Scholar
  10. Li, W., Liu, K., Liu, S.: Semiotic interoperability - a critical step towards systems integration. In: International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval and the International Conference on Knowledge, Management and Information Sharing, 19–22 September 2013, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal, pp. 508–513 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. Liu, K.: Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543364CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, K., Sun, L., Tan, S.: Modelling complex systems for project planning: a semiotics motivated method. Int. J. Gen Syst. 35(3), 313–327 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu, S., Li, W., Liu, K., Han, J.: Evaluation frameworks for information systems integration: from a semiotic lens. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, Reading, UK, pp. 1333–1340 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. Liu, S., Li, W., Liu, K.: Pragmatic oriented data interoperability for smart healthcare information systems. In: The 14th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, Chicago, USA (2014)Google Scholar
  15. Liu, S., Liu, K., Li, W.: Assessing pragmatic interoperability for process alignment in collaborative working environment. In: Proceedings of the 16th IFIP WG 8.1 International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations, ICISO 2015, Toulouse, France, 19–20 March, pp. 60–69 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. Meyers, B., Morris, E.: Proceedings of the System of Systems Interoperability Workshop, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, CMU/SEI-2003-TN-016, pp. 1–37 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. Panian, Z.: Why enterprise system integration is inevitable? WSEAS Trans. Bus. Econ. 2006, 590–595 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. Saag, K.G., Mohr, P.E., Esmail, L., Mudano, A.S., Wright, N., Beukelman, T., Tunis, S.R.: Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of pragmatic clinical trials in older adults in the United States. Contemp. Clin. Trials 33(6), 1211–1216 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2012.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seawright, J., Gerring, J.: Case selection techniques in case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Polit. Res. Q. 61(2), 294–308 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stamper, R.: Information in Business and Administrative Systems. Batsford, London (1973). http://www.getcited.org/pub/101449585
  21. Zutshi, A., Grilo, A., Jardim-Goncalves, R.: The business interoperability quotient measurement model. Comput. Ind. 63(5), 389–404 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Informatics Research CentreUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations