Advertisement

An Abductive Process of Developing Interactive Data Visualization: A Case Study of Market Attractiveness Analysis

  • Qi LiEmail author
  • Kecheng Liu
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 527)

Abstract

Data visualization has been widely utilized in various scenarios in data analytics for business purposes, especially helping novice readers make sense of complex dataset with interactive functions. However, due to an insufficient theoretical understanding of the process of developing interactive functions and visual presentations, interactive data visualization tools often display all available automatic graphing functions in front of users, instead of guiding them to choose a visualization based on their demands. Thus, this paper is intended to construct a process of developing interactive visualization with a specific focus on enabling the interoperation between design and interpretation. Stemmed from organizational semiotics, an abductive process will be portrayed in this paper to interpret the process of developing interactive data visualization. Especially the interactive functions will be employed in an iterative process, where producers can be aware of and respond to readers’ information demands on semantic, pragmatic and social levels.

Keywords

Interactive data visualization Organizational semiotics Abductive reasoning process 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, M., Ebert, D., Hagen, H., et al.: Data, information, and knowledge in visualization. Comput. Graph Appl. IEEE 29, 12–19 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2010.179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Segel, E., Heer, J.: Narrative visualization: telling stories with data. Vis. Comput. Graph 16(6), 1139–1148 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, K., Tan, C.: Semiotics in visualisation. In: 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS 2014, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 5–7 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tableau: Visual Analysis Best Practices, p. 41 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gartner: Magic quadrant for business intelligence and analytics platforms, pp. 1–126. Gartner (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004
  6. 6.
    Shneiderman, B.: The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium Visual Language, pp. 336–343 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1109/vl.1996.545307
  7. 7.
    Strecker, J.: Data visualization in review: summary. In: Evaluating IDRC results-communicating research for influence, IDRC (2012). https://idlbnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/49286/1/IDL-49286.pdf
  8. 8.
    SAS: Data visualization: making big data approachable and valuable. Whitepaper, Source IDG Research Services, April 2012Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, Y., Liu, D., Qu, H., et al.: A guided tour of literature review: facilitating academic paper reading with narrative visualization. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium Visual Information Communication Interact - VINCI 2016, pp. 17–24 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2968220.2968242
  10. 10.
    Stamper, R.K.: Information, Organisation and Technology: Studies in Organisational Semiotics. Springer, Boston (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1655-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, K., Li, W.: Organisational Semiotics for Business Informatics. Taylor & Francis, London (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stamper, R., Liu, K., Hafkamp, M., Ades, Y.: Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organizations - a semiotic approach to information systems design. Behav. Inf. Technol. 19, 15–27 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1080/014492900118768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friendly, M.: Brief history of data visualization. Handbook of Data Visualization. Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics, pp. 15–56. Springer, Berlin (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33037-0_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, K., Tan, C.: Semiotics in digital visualisation. In: Cordeiro, J., Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L., Camp, O., Filipe, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2014. LNBIP, vol. 227, pp. 3–13. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22348-3_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stamper, R.K.: Information in Business and Administrative Systems. Wiley, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tufte, E.R.: Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chi, E.H., Riedl, J.T.: An operator interaction framework for visualization systems. In: 1998 Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 63–70 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kovács, G., Spens, K.M.: Abductive reasoning in logistics research. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 35, 132–144 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510590318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dubois, A., Gadde, L.E.: Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. J. Bus. Res. 55, 553–560 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00195-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ho, Y.C.: Abduction? Deduction? Induction? Is there a logic of exploratory data analysis ? In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting American Educational Research Association, p. 28 (1994). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.135.3507&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  21. 21.
    Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philisophical, and Computational Foundations, p. 594. Brooks/Cole, Belmont (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kolko, J.: Abductive thinking and sensemaking: the drivers of design synthesis. Des. Issues 26, 15–28 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arrighi, C., Ferrario, R.: Abductive Reasoning, pp. 1–16. Interpretation and Collaborative Processes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tan, C., Liu, K.: An organisational semiotics inspired information architecture: pervasive healthcare as a case study. In: ICISO 2013 - Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Informatics Semiotics Organisation IFIP WG81 Work Conference, pp. 35–44 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kodagoda, N., Attfield, S., Wong, B.L., et al.: Using interactive visual reasoning to support sense-making: implications for design. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph 19, 2217–2226 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, Q., Liu, K.: Interactive data visualisation: facilitate the accountability disclosure through the lens of organisational semiotics. In: International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations, pp. 133–142. Springer, (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Informatics Research Center, Henley Business SchoolUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations