Advertisement

Business Intelligence Architecture Informed by Organisational Semiotics

  • John EffahEmail author
  • Prince Kwame Senyo
  • Stephen Opoku-Anokye
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 527)

Abstract

This study draws on organisational semiotics and design science methodology informed by abductive reasoning to develop a business intelligence (BI) architecture. Organisational semiotics research has so far paid limited attention to BI in general and its architecture in particular. Moreover, BI research in information systems (IS) focuses largely on either technical or social activities. Organisational semiotics offers frameworks and model which can be used to develop a BI architecture with combined technical and social views. This study therefore develops a BI architecture based on knowledge hierarchy, semiotic framework, and semiotic activity hierarchy. The paper uses a manufacturing company’s BI experience as a case study to inform and evaluate the proposed architecture. The study’s contribution stems from its development of the organisational semiotics informed BI architecture and its implications for research and practice.

Keywords

Organisational semiotics Business intelligence Knowledge hierarchy Forma-informa-performa Semiotic framework 

References

  1. 1.
    Ackoff, R.L.: From data to wisdom. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 16(1), 3–9 (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baskarada, S., Koronios, A.: Data, information, knowledge, wisdom (DIKW): a semiotic theoretical and empirical exploration of the hierarchy and its quality dimension. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 18(1), 5–24 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beynon-Davies, P.: Formatics. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, Washington, 9–12 August 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: What is “information” beyond a definition? In: Thirty Sixth International Conferences on Information Systems, Forth Worth, pp. 1–20 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, H., Storey, V.C.: Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Q. 36(4), 1165–1188 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietz, J.: The deep structure of business processes. Commun. ACM 49(5), 59–64 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grossmann, W., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Fundamentals of Business Intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46531-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leismeister, J.: Collective intelligence. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 4(2), 245–248 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, K.: Requirements reengineering from legacy information systems using semiotic techniques. Syst. Signs Actions Int. J. Commun. Inf. Technol. Work 1(1), 38–61 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, K.: Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, K.: Semiotics in visualisation. In: 2014 9th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE), pp. 1–3 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, K., Li, W.: Organisational Semiotics for Business Informatics. Routeledge, London (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, K., Tan, C.: Semiotics in digital visualisation. In: Cordeiro, J., Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L., Camp, O., Filipe, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2014. LNBIP, vol. 227, pp. 3–13. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22348-3_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mingers, J.: Guidelines for Conducting Semiotic Research in Information Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Negash, S.: Business intelligence. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13, 177–195 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olszak, C.: Toward better understanding and use of business intelligence in organizations. Inf. Syst. Manag. 33(2), 105–123 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olszak, C., Ziemba, E.: Approach to building and implementing business intelligence systems. Interdiscip. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 2, 135–148 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rowley, J.: The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. J. Inf. Sci. 33(2), 163–180 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sahay, B.S., Ranjan, J.: Real time business intelligence in supply chain analytics. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 16(1), 28–48 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tan, C., et al.: Information architecture for healthcare organizations: the case of a NHS hospital in UK. In: ICIS 2013 Proceedings, pp. 1–11 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tan, C., Liu, K.: An organisational semiotics inspired information architecture: pervasive healthcare as a case study. In: ICISO 2013 – Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Informatics Semiotics in Organisations IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference, pp. 35–44 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Operations and Management Information SystemsUniversity of Ghana Business SchoolAccraGhana
  2. 2.Informatics Research Centre, Henley Business SchoolUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations