Advertisement

Does It Pay to Be Socially Responsible for Construction Companies?

  • Anupam NandaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 527)

Abstract

Within the built environment, the Engineering and Construction (E&C) companies are very natural resource-intensive in terms of their business operations. In this paper, we focus on publicly listed E&C companies and analyse the role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities on their corporate financial performance. The analytical framework is built around the economic theory of private provision of public goods. A basic Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is used to empirically examine the testable hypothesis with a panel data comprising 17 major E&C companies with monthly data over 2000-13. The results indicate that CSR activities can influence financial performance significantly after controlling for the firm size variable. We make use of several measures of CSR activities to test robustness. The broad results are robust to a range of alternative model specifications.

Keywords

Built environment Corporate social responsibility CAPM 

References

  1. 1.
    Bagnoli, M., Watts, S.: Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 12(3), 419–445 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maxwell, J., Lyon, T., Hackett, S.: Self-regulation and social welfare: the political economy of corporate environmentalism. J. Law Econ. 43(2), 583–618 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.: Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strateg. Manag. J. 21(5), 603–609 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.: Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26, 117–127 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., Wright, P.: Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J. Manag. Stud. 43, 1–18 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stanwick, P., Stanwick, S.: The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: an empirical examination. J. Bus. Ethics 17(2), 195–204 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roberts, P., Dowling, G.: Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 23(12), 1077–1093 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Margolis, J., Elfenbein, H., Walsh, J.: Does It Pay to be Good? A Meta-Analysis and Redirection of Research on the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Mimeo, Harvard Business School, Boston (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Beurden, P., Goessling, T.: The worth of values – a literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. J. Bus. Ethics 82(2), 407–424 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones, P., Comfort, D., Hiller, D.: Corporate social responsibility and the UK construction industry. J. Corp. Real Estate 8(3), 134–150 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao, Z., Zhao, X., Davidson, K., Zuo, J.: A corporate social responsibility indicator system for construction enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 29–30, 277–289 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sharpe, W.: Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Finan. 19, 425–442 (1964)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lintner, J.: The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev. Econ. Stat. 47, 13–37 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cardebat, J., Sirven, N.: What corporate social responsibility reporting adds to financial return? J. Econ. Inter. Finan. 2(2), 020–027 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hausman, J.: Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6), 1251–1271 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Henley Business SchoolUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations