Advertisement

Introducing the Strategy Lifecycle: Using Ontology and Semiotics to Interlink Strategy Design to Strategy Execution

  • Jamie CaineEmail author
  • Mark von Rosing
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 527)

Abstract

The ability of existing strategy concepts to analyse strategy, design strategy and execute strategy within organisations has an alarmingly poor historical track record. Based on the long-standing semiotics and ontology research work of the Global University Alliance (GUA) and its members, a Strategy Lifecycle is introduced. The Strategy Lifecycle, underpinned by ontology and semiotics incorporates all the constructs that can be found in the most popular strategy concepts and frameworks. It explains the value of the underlying strategy ontology and the relationship between the strategy meta model, the Strategy Lifecycle and various artefacts used around strategy work. The paper concludes with future scope and application that lies ahead for the Strategy Lifecycle.

Keywords

Strategy Lifecycle Strategy artefacts Strategy meta model Strategy semiotics Strategy ontology Strategy architecture 

References

  1. 1.
    Ansoff, H.I.: Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. McGraw-Hill, New York City (1965)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bridges Business Consultancy: Strategy implementation Survey Results (2016). http://www.implementation-hub.com/resources/implementation-surveys
  3. 3.
    Cândido, C., Santos, S.: Strategy implementation: what is the failure rate? J. Manag. Organ. 21, 237–262 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carucci, R.: Executives fail to execute strategy because They’re too internally focused (2017). https://hbr.org/2017/11/executives-fail-to-execute-strategy-because-theyre-too-internally-focused
  5. 5.
    Chandler, A.D.: Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1962)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Godfrey, R.D.: Strategic management: a critical introduction. Routledge, Abingdon/London/New York (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mellat-Parast, M., Golmohammadi, D., Mcfadden, K.L., Miller, J.W.: Linking business strategy to service failures and financial performance: empirical evidence from the U.S. domestic airline industry. J. Oper. Manag. 38, 14–24 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Oxford University Press: Strategy—definition of strategy in English by oxford dictionaries. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/strategy (2018)
  10. 10.
    Pettigrew, A.M., Thomas, H., Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A.M.: Handbook of Strategy and Management. SAGE, London (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sloan, A.P.: My Years with General Motors. Sidgwick and Jackson - Pan, London (1965)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith, R.R.: The Reality Test: Still Relying on Strategy?. Profile Books, London (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whittington, R.: What is Strategy - And Does it Matter. Thompson Learning, London (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    von Rosing, M., Urquhart, B., Zachman, J.: Using a business ontology for structuring artefacts: example - northern health. Int. J. Conceptual Struct. Smart Appl. 3, 42–85 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Porter, M.E.: How competitive forces shape strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev. 57, 137–145 (1979)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Porter, M.E.: The value chain and competitive advantage, pp. 50–66 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Porter, M.E.: What is Strategy? Harv. Bus. Rev. 74, 61 (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Prasad, A.: Strategy as “inferior” choice: a re-interpretation of porter’s “what is strategy?”. J. Manag. Res. 10, 15 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Valos, M.J., Bednall, D.H.B., Callaghan, B.: The impact of Porter's strategy types on the role of market research and customer relationship management. Mark. Intell. Plan. 25, 147–156 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cordeiro, J., Filipe, J.: The semiotic pentagram framework–a perspective on the use of semiotics within organisational semiotics (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Genesereth, M.R., Nilsson, N.J.: Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 58. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (1987)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giaretta, P., Guarino, N.: Ontologies and knowledge bases towards a terminological clarification. Towards Very Large knowl. Bases: Knowl. Build. Knowl. Shar. 25, 307–317 (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guarino, N.: Semantic matching: formal ontological distinctions for information organization, extraction, and integration. In: Pazienza, M.T. (ed.) SCIE 1997. LNCS, vol. 1299, pp. 139–170. Springer, Heidelberg (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63438-X_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    von Rosing, M., Laurier, W.: An introduction to the business ontology. Int. J. Conceptual Struct. Smart Appl. 3, 20–41 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    von Rosing, M., Laurier, W., Polovina, S.M.: (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    von Rosing, M., Arzumanyan, M., Zachman Sr., J.A.: The relationship between ontology and modelling concepts: example role oriented modelling. Int. J. Conceptual Struct. Smart Appl. 5, 25–47 (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    von Rosing, M.: The Complete Business Process Handbook Body of Knowledge from Process Modeling to BPM, vol. I. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Giannoulis, C., Petit, M., Zdravkovic, J.: Modeling business strategy: a meta-model of strategy maps and balanced scorecards, pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Klag, M., Langley, A.: Critical junctures in strategic planning: understanding failure to enable success. Organ. Dyn. 43, 274–283 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ComputingSheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK
  2. 2.The Global University AllianceBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations