Advertisement

The Social Layer of Stampers Ladder: A Systematic Approach to the Soft Edge of Organizational Transformations

  • Auke J. J. van BreemenEmail author
  • Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 527)

Abstract

The social layer of Stampers ladder addresses the problem of responsible agents interacting with each other. It is the layer at which in organizations decisions are made and transformations negotiated. The method we present supports this human interplay. It combines principles of actualism, ontology charts, the knowledge in Formation process model and the Cynefin framework to gather and combine quantitative data with qualitative data, expressing attitudes and perceptions in meaningful diagrammatic representations of business processes. The analytic tool Sensemaker can be used to support decision making.

Keywords

Actualism Ontology chart Cynefin Knowledge in Formation (KiF) Stakeholder focused modelling Process Qualitative and quantitative data Peircean semiotics 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Gazendam, H., Liu, K.: The evolution of organizational semiotics; a brief review of the contribution of ronald stamper. In: Liu, J.F.K. (ed.) Studies in Organisational Semiotics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, S., Li, W., Liu, K.: Assessing pragmatic interoperability of information systems from a semiotic perspective. In: Liu, K., Gulliver, S.R., Li, W., Yu, C. (eds.) ICISO 2014. IAICT, vol. 426, pp. 32–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55355-4_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, S., Li, W., Liu, K.: Assessing pragmatic interoperability for process alignment in collaborative working environment. In: Liu, K., Nakata, K., Li, W., Galarreta, D. (eds.) ICISO 2015. IAICT, vol. 449, pp. 60–69. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16274-4_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weaver, W.: The mathematical theory of communication. In: Shannon, C. Some Recent Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1949) 1998Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldkuhl, G., Ågerfalk, P.J.: Actability; a way to understand information systems pragmatics. In: Liu, K., Clarke, R.J., Andersen, P.B., Stamper, R.K. (eds.) Coordination and Communication Using Signs: Studies in Organisational Semiotics. INOD, vol. 2, pp. 85–113. Springer, Boston (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0803-8_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oppl, S., Hoppenbrouwers, S.: Scaffolding stakeholder-centric enterprise model articulation. In: Horkoff, J., Jeusfeld, Manfred A., Persson, A. (eds.) PoEM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 267, pp. 133–147. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48393-1_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonacin, R., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Liu, K.: From ontology charts to class diagrams: semantic analysis aiding systems design. In: ICEIS, no. 3, pp. 389–395 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurtz, C.F., Snowden, D.J.: The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM Syst. J. 42(3), 462–483 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farkas, J.I., Sarbo, J.J.: A logical ontology. In: Stumme, G. (ed.) Working with Conceptual Structures: Contributions to ICCS 2000, pp. 138-151. Shaker Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany (2000). 2(5), 99–110 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sarbo, J.J., Farkas, J.I., van Breemen, A.J.J.: Knowledge in Formation: A Computational Theory of Interpretation. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17089-8CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Breemen, A.J.J.: Quality of service in the long tail: narratives and the exploitation of soft metadata. In: Liu, K., Gulliver, S.R., Li, W., Yu, C. (eds.) ICISO 2014. IAICT, vol. 426, pp. 22–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55355-4_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, K.: Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering. Cambridge University Press (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Auke J. J. van Breemen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen
    • 2
  1. 1.KiF-adviesNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Bibo TrainingenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations