Skip to main content

Using Photovoice with Ex-prisoners: An Exemplar

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter is drawn from the author’s Photovoice research project, Radically Rethinking Imprisonment, conducted with 12 former prisoners in South Australia. It demonstrates the breadth and depth of the images and narratives created by participants, showing how they took charge of the direction of the research, despite it being a researcher initiated project. Placed at its heart is the quality and significance of the ‘data’ through powerful imagery created by the participants. As active subjects, rather than passive objects of research, participants provided a considered account of their experiences as they produced new knowledge. Their data, in the form of photographs and accompanying narratives are profoundly personal while at the same time reflect common, shared experiences. The chapter concludes with a discussion about the transformative effect that participatory action research can have for researchers as well as participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The people that are given a custodial sentence tend to be from the precariat class. Guy Standing (2011) describes the precariat as being most likely to be: (1) poor; (2) unlikely to have quality legal representation; (3) have an addiction or poor mental health, and are unable to access holistic, publicly-funded treatment facilities; (4) have little formally recognised education; and (5) are unlikely to have held secure well-paid, meaningful work. As Standing argues, even when the precariat are not being held in a prison, they are already experiencing a broad loss of rights across civil, cultural, social, political and economic spheres, responsibility for which he places firmly with neoliberal ideologies.

  2. 2.

    Convict Criminology is an area of criminology led by former prisoners who, fed up with the ‘positivist, functionalist and labelling approaches’ found in mainstream criminology, decided to create a formal network that would critically challenge this approach. Members of the New School of Convict Criminology are criminalised men and women who have earned academic qualifications and contribute to scholarly research, writing and teaching from a ‘convict perspective’. For more see http://www.convictcriminology.org/about.htm.

  3. 3.

    An honorarium of AUD$40 in the form of a supermarket shopping voucher was paid at each of the three project steps; before the initial interview, upon completion of the photography phase and before our final interview.

  4. 4.

    A copy of the handbook is available in the following chapter, including two of the images she created.

References

  • Bagguley, P., & Mann, K. (1992). Idle thieving bastards? Scholarly representations of the ‘underclass’. Work, Employment & Society, 6(1), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque, NM: UNM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1984). ‘It’s great to have someone to talk to’: The ethics and politics of interviewing women. In C. Bell & H. Roberts (Eds.), Social researching: Politics, problems, practice (pp. 70–87). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fook, J. (2014). The meaning of animals in women’s lives: The importance of the ‘domestic’ realm to social work. In T. Ryan (Ed.), Animals in social work: Why and how they matter (pp. 18–31). Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarldorn, M. (2016a). Picturing creative approaches to social work research: Using photography to promote social change. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(4), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarldorn, M. (2016b). What can Ruby do with a camera? Ex-prisoners use Photovoice to reverse the rules of surveillance. Qualitative Social Work, 15(2), 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarldorn, M. (2018). Radically rethinking imprisonment: A Photovoice exploration of life in and after prison in South Australia. Doctoral thesis, Flinders University, South Australia. Available at https://theses.flinders.edu.au/view/90c3de9e-5a3f-4f64-8cc2-353aafdf04b7/1.

  • Jarldorn, M., & Deer. (2017). Participatory action research with ex-prisoners: Using Photovoice and one woman’s story told through poetry. Action Research (Online First).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1974). What works?—Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 30–61). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (2016). Interviewing women again: Power, time and the gift. Sociology, 50(1), 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, S., & Ross, J. (2001). Introducing the new school of convict criminology. Social Justice, 28(1), 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, S., & Ross, J. (2003). Convict perspective on the classification of prisoners. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(2), 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, B. (2016). Using the eye of the camera to bare racism: A Photovoice project. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(4), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J., & Solomon, J. (1995). What can a woman do with a camera? London: Scarlett Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The dangerous new class. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Burris, M. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health, Education & Behaviour, 24(3), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Jarldorn .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jarldorn, M. (2019). Using Photovoice with Ex-prisoners: An Exemplar. In: Photovoice Handbook for Social Workers. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94511-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94511-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94510-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94511-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics