Advertisement

How Collaboration and Digitization Transform Large Project Business

  • Klaus Backhaus
  • Ulf König
Chapter
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

This paper addresses collaboration and digitization as two omnipresent phenomena in the specific context of large project business (LPB). In order to understand the necessary change processes, we first give deeper insights into the characteristics of LPB and the drivers due to which collaboration has become a key issue in this industry. Subsequently, we analyze the joint effect that collaboration and digitization have on the LPB business model. Contrary to common misperceptions claiming these trends to be relevant only for B2C industries, we show that there are just as strong and fast consequences in the B2B sector, especially in LPB.

References

  1. Alexa. (2017). The top 500 sites on the web. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from https://www.alexa.com/topsites.
  2. Backhaus, K., Bröker, O., Brüne, P., & Gausling, P. (2013). Digitale Medien in B2B-Beschaffungsprozessen - eine explorative Untersuchung. Working Paper No. 52, Institut für Anlagen und Systemtechnologien, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster.Google Scholar
  3. Backhaus, K., Brüne, P. A., & Wiegand, N. (2013). Auftragsfinanzierung und Financial Engineering. In M. Kleinaltenkamp, W. Plinke, & I. Geiger (Eds.), Auftrags- und Projektmanagement (pp. 137–173). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Backhaus, K., & Gnam, P. (1999). Vertragsmanagement im internationalen Anlagengeschäft. Berlin: unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. Backhaus, K., & Molter, W. (1984). Auswirkungen verwirkter Pönale - Finanzielle Konsequenzen alternativer interner Haftungsregelungen bei konsortial errichteten Industrieanlagen. ZfbF, 36(3), 183–199.Google Scholar
  6. Backhaus, K., & Uekermann, H. (1990). Projektfinanzierung: eine Methode zur Finanzierung von Großprojekten. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 19(3), 106–112.Google Scholar
  7. Backhaus, K., & Voeth, M. (2014). Industriegütermarketing. München: Verlag Franz Vahlen GmbH.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emiliani, M. L. (2000). Business-to-business online auctions: Key issues for purchasing process improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(4), 176–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Encyclopedia Britannica. (2007). Wiki. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from https://www.britannica.com/topic/wiki.
  10. Faratina, P., Sierra, C., & Jennings, N. R. (2002). Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence, 142(2), 205–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gershgorn, D. (2017). How a poker-playing AI is learning to negotiate better than any human. Retrieved November 07, 2017, from https://qz.com/907896/how-poker-playing-ai-libratus-is-learning-to-negotiate-better-than-any-human/.
  12. Google. (2017). Google Docs—Create and edit documents online, for free. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from https://www.google.com/docs/about/.
  13. Günter, B. (2013). Projektkooperationen. In M. Kleinaltenkamp, W. Plinke, & I. Geiger (Eds.), Auftrags- und Projektmanagement (pp. 383–422). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta, J. N. D. (1997). Association for Information Systems Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, 15–17 August 1997. Indianapolis (pp. 417–419).Google Scholar
  15. Häberle, S. (2002). Handbuch der Außenhandelsfinanzierung. München, Wien: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hassan, Q. F. (2011). Demystifying cloud computing. The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 16–21.Google Scholar
  17. Hsu, F.-h. (2002). Behind deep blue. Building the computer that defeated the world chess champion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Igbaria, M., & Tan, M. (1998). The virtual workplace. London: Idea group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. The Journal of Law & Economics, 21(2), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleinaltenkamp, M. (2001). Business-to-business-marketing. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, M. R. (2014). Leading virtual project teams: Adapting leadership theories and communications techniques to 21st century organizations. Boca Raton: Auerbach Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The wiki way: Collaboration and sharing on the internet: Quick collaboration on the web. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  23. Lin, R., & Kraus, S. (2010). Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015). Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: A research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maccoby, M. (1991). Closing the motivation gap. Research-Technology Management, 34(1), 50–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, M. (2012). B2B digital marketing: Using the web to market directly to business. Indianapolis: Que Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oracle. (2016). How do general contractors find their subcontractors and why should you care? Retrieved November 7, 2017, from http://www.texturacorp.com/bidmanagement-blog/how-do-general-contractors-find-their-subcontractors-and-why-should-you-care/.
  29. Plinke, W. (1997). Grundlagen des Geschäftsbeziehungsmanagements. In W. Plinke & M. Kleinaltenkamp (Eds.), Geschäftsbeziehungsmanagement im Technischen Vertrieb (pp. 1–62). Berlin.Google Scholar
  30. Richter, H. P. (2001). Investitionsgütermarketing: Business-to-Business-Marketing von Industriegüterunternehmen. München: Fachbuchverlag Leipzig.Google Scholar
  31. Rohrbach, B. (1969). Kreativ nach Regeln – Methode 635, eine neue Technik zum Lösen von Problemen. Absatzwirtschaft, 12(19), 73–76.Google Scholar
  32. Ros, R., & Sierra, C. (2006). A negotiation meta strategy combining trade-off and concession moves. Autonomous agent and multiagent systems, 12(2), 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sashi, C. M., & O’Leary, B. (2002). The role of Internet auctions in the expansion of B2B markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(2), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siepert, H.-M. (1987). Multinationale Anbietergemeinschaften in der Exportfinanzierung. In K. Backhaus & H.-M. Siepert (Eds.), Auftragsfinanzierung im internationalen Anlagengeschäft (pp. 145–162). Stuttgart: Poeschel Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Smeltzer, L. R., & Carr, A. S. (2002). Reverse auctions in industrial marketing and buying. Business Horizons, 45(2), 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spice, B., & Allen, G. (2017). Upping the ante: Top poker pros face off vs. artificial intelligence. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2017/january/poker-pros-vs-AI.html.
  38. The Economist. (2009). The virtual organization. Retrieved November 7, 2017, from http://www.economist.com/node/14301746.
  39. Yang, Y., Falcao, H., Delicado, N., & Ortony, A. (2014). Reducing mistrust in agent-human negotiations. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 29(2), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang, Y., Singhal, S., & Yunjie, X. (2014). Alternate strategies for a win-win seeking agent in agent-human negotiations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(3), 223–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zeng, D., & Sycara, K. (1998). Bayesian learning in negotiation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 48(1), 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WWU - University of MuensterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations