Skip to main content

Looking for Additional Data Sources for HRA: Microworlds and Beyond

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 778))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Human error is attributed as the cause of 50–90% of all accidents and incidents. One of the method-types that try to estimate or predict human error is human reliability analysis (HRA). This paper explores how microworlds - graphically rich and complex rule governed virtual worlds that users immersed themselves in – can be used in HRA. The main focus is research microworlds, but also microworlds made for recreational purposes (i.e. video games) are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Whittingham, R.B.: The Blame Machine: Why Human Error Causes Accidents. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Helmreich, R.L., Merritt, A.C., Wilhelm, J.A.: The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 9, 19–32 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reason, J.: The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 327, 475–484 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vinnem, J.E., Seljelid, J., Haugen, S., Sklet, S., Aven, T.: Generalized methodology for operational risk analysis of offshore installations. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 223, 87–97 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meshkati, N.: Human factors in large-scale technological systems’ accidents: Three Mile Island, Bhopal. Chernobyl. Organ. Environ. 5, 133–154 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kemeny, J.: Saving the American democracy: the lessons of Three Mile Island. Technol. Rev. 83, 65–75 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Perrow, C.: Organization, 1–22 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rogovin, M.: Three mile island: a report to the commission and to the public, vol. 1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skogdalen, J.E., Vinnem, J.E.: Quantitative risk analysis offshore—human and organizational factors. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96, 468–479 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guldenmund, F.: The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Saf. Sci. 34, 215–257 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guldenmund, F.W.: The use of questionnaires in safety culture research – an evaluation. Saf. Sci. 45, 723–743 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao, S.: Safety culture and accident analysis--a socio-management approach based on organizational safety social capital. J. Hazard. Mater. 142, 730–740 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Milch, V., Laumann, K.: Interorganizational complexity and organizational accident risk: a literature review. Saf. Sci. 82, 9–17 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reason, J.: Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Swain, A.D.: Human reliability analysis: need, status, trends and limitations. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 29, 301–313 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Laumann, K.: Criteria for qualitative methods in Human Reliability Analysis. Rev.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laumann, K., Blackman, H.S., Rasmussen, M.: Challenges with data for human reliability analysis (HRA). In: Proceedings of ESREL 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Swain, A.D., Guttmann, H.E.: Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final Report. U.S. NRC, Washington, DC (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Hallbert, B., Boring, R.L., Gertman, D., Dudenhoeffer, D., Whaley, A., Marble, J., Joe, J., Lois, E.: Human Event Repository and Analysis (HERA) System. Overview, Washington, DC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. James Chang, Y., Bley, D., Criscione, L., Kirwan, B., Mosleh, A., Madary, T., Nowell, R., Richards, R., Roth, E.M., Sieben, S., Zoulis, A.: The SACADA database for human reliability and human performance. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 125, 117–133 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirwan, B., Basra, G., Taylor-Adams, S.E.: CORE-DATA: a computerised human error database for human reliability support. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, 1997. “Global Perspectives of Human Factors in Power Generation”, Orlando, FL (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Forester, J., Dang, V.N., Bye, A., Lois, E., Massaiu, S., Broberg, H., Braarud, P.Ø., Boring, R.L., Mannisto, I., Liao, H., Julius, J., Parry, G., Nelson, P.: The International HRA Empirical Study: Lessons Learned from Comparing HRA Methods Predictions to HAMMLAB Simulator Data (NUREG-2127). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boring, R.L., Forester, J.A., Bye, A., Dang, V.N., Lois, E.: Lessons learned on benchmarking from the international human reliability analysis empirical study. In: Proceedings of the Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 2010), Seattle, WA, June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dang, V.N., Bye, A., Lois, E., Forester, J.A., Kolaczkowski, A.M., Braarud, P.Ø.: Benchmarking HRA methods against simulator data—design and organization of the Halden empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 9), Hong Kong, China (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Boring, R.L., Mandelli, D., Joe, J., Smith, C., Groth, K.: Light water reactor sustainability program: a research roadmap for computation-based human reliability analysis (INL/EXT-15-36051). Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rasmussen, M., Standal, M.I., Laumann, K.: Task complexity as a performance shaping factor: a review and recommendations in standardized plant analysis risk-human reliability analysis (SPAR-H) adaption. Saf. Sci. 76, 228–238 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Laumann, K., Rasmussen, M.: Experience and training as performance-shaping factors in human reliability analysis. In: Walls, L., Revie, M., Bedford, T. (eds.) Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the 26th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2016, Glasgow, Scotland, 25–29 September 2016. CRC Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laumann, K., Rasmussen, M.: Suggested improvements to the definitions of Standardized Plant Analysis of Risk-Human Reliability Analysis (SPAR-H) performance shaping factors, their levels and multipliers and the nominal tasks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 145, 287–300 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boring, R., Kelly, D., Smidts, C., Mosleh, A., Dyre, B.: Microworlds, Simulators, and Simulation: Framework for a Benchmark of Human Reliability Data Sources. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM-11), Helsinki, Finland (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bye, A., Laumann, K., Taylor, C., Rasmussen, M., Øie, S., van de Merwe, K., Øien, K., Boring, R.L., Paltrinieri, N., Wærø, I., Massaiu, S., Gould, K.: The Petro-HRA Guideline (IFE/HR/F-2017/001). Institute for Energy Technology, Halden, Norway (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Williams, J.C., Bell, J.L.: Consolidation of the human error assessment and reduction technique. In: Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the 26th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2016, Glasgow, Scotland, 25–29 September 2016, pp. 883–889 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Williams, J.C.: A User Manual for the HEART. DNV Technica Ltd., Stockport (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Williams, J.C.: A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance. In: Conference Record for 1988 IEEE Fourth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, pp. 436–450. IEEE (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Turkle, S.: The Second Self: The Human Spirit in a Computer Culture. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Omodei, M.M., Wearing, A.J.: The Fire Chief microworld generating program: an illustration of computer-simulated microworlds as an experimental paradigm for studying complex decision-making behavior. Behav. Res. Methods Instr. Comput. 27, 303–316 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brehmer, B., Dörner, D.: Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study. Comput. Human Behav. 9, 171–184 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Funke, J.: Microworlds based on linear equation systems: A new approach to complex problem solving and experimental results. In: The Cognitive Psychology of Knowledge, pp. 313–330 (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H.W., Reither, F., Stäudel, T.: Lohhausen: Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität. Huber, Bern, Germany (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dörner, D.: On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. Simul. Games 11, 87–106 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Orchanian, L.C., Smahel, T.P., Howie, D.E., Vicente, K.J.: DURESS II user’s manual: A thermal-hydraulic process simulator for research and teaching. Cognit. Eng. Lab., Toronto (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ulrich, T.A., Lew, R., Werner, S., Boring, R.L.: Rancor: a gamified microworld nuclear power plant simulation for engineering psychology research and process control applications. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 61, 398–402 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ulrich, T., Boring, R.L., Lew, R.: Extrapolating nuclear process control microworld simulation performance data from novices to experts - a preliminary analysis. In: Proceedings of AHFE 2018, Orlando, FL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson, K., Bedwell, W.L., Lazzara, E.H., Salas, E., Burke, C.S., Estock, J.L., Orvis, K.L., Conkey, C.: Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes: review and research proposals. Simul. Gaming 40, 217–266 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirillov, A.V., Vinichenko, M.V., Melnichuk, A.V., Melnichuk, Y.A., Vinogradova, M.V.: Improvement in the learning environment through gamification of the educational process. Math. Educ. 11, 2071–2085 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”. In: Proceedings 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, MindTrek 2011, vol. 9 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mishra, P., Foster, A.N.: The claims of games: a comprehensive review and directions for future. In: 18th International Conference of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE 2007), pp. 1–10 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Theodore, S.: Why have video game budgets skyrocketed in recent years? https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/10/31/why-have-video-game-budgets-skyrocketed-in-recent-years/#6f28b8373ea5

  48. Rasmussen, M., Boring, R.L.: The implementation of complexity in computation-based human reliability analysis. In: Walls, L., Revie, M., Bedford, T. (eds.) Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice. Proceedings of the 26th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2016, Glasgow, Scotland, 25–29 September 2016. CRC Press, Croydon (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bye, A., Lois, E., Dang, V.N., Parry, G., Forester, J., Massaiu, S., Boring, R.L., Braarud, P.Ø., Broberg, H., Julius, J.: International HRA Empirical Study–Phase 2 Report: Results from Comparing HRA Method Predictions to Simulator Data from SGTR Scenarios (NUREG/IA-0216, Vol. 2). U.S. NRC, Washington, DC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rasmussen, M., Boring, R.L., Ulrich, T., Ewing, S.M.: The virtual human reliability analyst. In: Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Steam: Steam & Game Stats. http://store.steampowered.com/stats/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Rasmussen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rasmussen, M., Laumann, K., Boring, R. (2019). Looking for Additional Data Sources for HRA: Microworlds and Beyond. In: Boring, R. (eds) Advances in Human Error, Reliability, Resilience, and Performance. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 778. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94391-6_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94391-6_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94390-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94391-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics