Advertisement

Indicators and Goals for Sustainable Production Planning and Controlling from an Ergonomic Perspective

  • Maximilian ZarteEmail author
  • Agnes Pechmann
  • Isabel L. Nunes
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 781)

Abstract

The need for sustainable development has been widely recognized by governments and enterprises and has become a hot topic of various disciplines including ergonomics and industrial engineering. Sustainable development can only be achieved if impacts and benefits on current and future generations of humans are focused according to the three dimensions of sustainability. The paper provides an overview on indicators and goals for sustainable production planning and controlling (sPPC) processes in manufacturing companies from an Ergonomic perspective. This was done based on a root cause analysis. For the analysis, the main stakeholder groups for sPPC are identified, and sustainable indicators and goals are selected through a text review according to the interests of the stakeholder groups. The results can be used as basis to support and improve the outcome of the sPPC process discussions with company managers, experts and employees’ representatives.

Keywords

Sustainable Development Human Centered Development 

References

  1. 1.
    Radjiyev, A., Qiu, H., Xiong, S., Nam, K.: Ergonomics and sustainable development in the past two decades (1992-2011): research trends and how ergonomics can contribute to sustainable development. Appl. Ergon. 46, 67–75 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    WCED: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United Nations: Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. In: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, no. A/CONF.151/26, vol. 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elkington, J.: Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    IEA: IEA Executive Defines Ergonomics. On-Site Newsletter for the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thatcher, A.: Green ergonomics: definition and scope. Ergonomics 56(3), 389–398 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moldan, B., Janoušková, S., Hák, T.: How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: indicators and targets. Ecol. Indic. 17, 4–13 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joung, C.B., Carrell, J., Sarkar, P., Feng, S.C.: Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecol. Indic. 24, 148–157 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Global Footprint Network: Ecological Footprint. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/. Accessed 08 Feb 2018
  10. 10.
    ZSL: Living Planet Index. http://www.livingplanetindex.org/home/index. Accessed 08 Feb 2018
  11. 11.
    Popovic, T., Barbosa-Póvoa, A., Kraslawski, A., Carvalho, A.: Quantitative indicators for social sustainability assessment of supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 180, 748–768 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coskun, A., Zimmerman, J., Erbug, C.: Promoting sustainability through behavior change: a review. Des. Stud. 41, 183–204 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thatcher, A., Waterson, P., Todd, A., Moray, N.: State of science: ergonomics and global issues. Ergonomics 1–33 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilson, P.F., Dell, L.D., Anderson, G.F.: Root Cause Analysis: A Tool for Total Quality Management. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benoît-Norris, C., et al.: Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16(7), 682–690 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sutherland, J.W., et al.: The role of manufacturing in affecting the social dimension of sustainability. CIRP Annals – Manuf. Technol. 65(2), 689–712 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deutsche Bundesregierung: Deutsche NachhaltigkeitsstrategieGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    NIST: Sustainable Manufacturing Indicator Repository. http://www.mel.nist.gov/div826/msid/SMIR/index.html. Accessed 07 Feb 2018
  19. 19.
    United Nations: Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to Transform our World. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 08 Feb 2018
  20. 20.
    European agency for safety and health: European directives on safety and health at work. Accessed 23 Feb 2018Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    European Commission: Paris Agreement. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/paris_en. Accessed 23 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maximilian Zarte
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agnes Pechmann
    • 2
  • Isabel L. Nunes
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversidade Nova de LisboaCaparicaPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Applied Sciences Emden/LeerEmdenGermany
  3. 3.UNIDEMICaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations