Skip to main content

Quantifying the Contribution of Individual Display Features on Fixation Duration to Support Human-System Interface Design in Nuclear Power Plants

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 787))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The integration of new digital instrumentation and control (I&C) technologies like advanced human-system interfaces in U.S. nuclear power plant main control rooms is important for addressing long-term aging and obsolescence of existing I&C. Nonetheless, attention should be made to ensure these technologies reflect state-of-the-art human factors engineering (HFE) principles. Often, there is conflicting guidance from one guideline to another, requiring the analyst to make a judgment call on addressing these ‘tradeoffs.’ The objective of this research was to inform the analyst of these tradeoffs through an empirical investigation of how certain display features that characterize common HFE guidelines concerning visual clutter and saliency influence information processing in a naturalistic context. By understanding the unique contribution of each display feature using a multilevel model, the HFE analyst should have an understanding of the interrelations of each feature with its impact on cognitive processes. Results and implications are discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kovesdi, C.R., Joe, J.C., Boring, R.L.: A human factors engineering process to support human-system interface design in control room modernization. In: 10th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human Machine Interface Technologies, pp. 1843–1855 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines, NUREG-0700, Rev. 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kirwan, B., Ainsworth, L.K. (eds.): A Guide to Task Analysis: The Task Analysis Working Group. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kovesdi, C.R., Joe, J.C.: A review of human-system interface design issues observed during analog-to-digital and digital-to-digital migrations in U.S. nuclear power plants. In: 10th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human Machine Interface Technologies, pp. 1568–1580 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: IEEE Guide to the Evaluation of Human-System Performance in Nuclear Power Generating Stations (IEEE Std. 845-1999). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kantowitz, B.H.: Selecting measures for human factors research. Hum. Factors 34(4), 387–398 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G., Banbury, S., Parasuraman, R.: Engineering Psychology & Human Performance. Psychology Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jacob, R.J., Karn, K.S.: Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. Mind 2(3), 4 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cogn. Psychol. 8, 441–480 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kovesdi, C., Rice, B., Bower, G., Spielman, Z., Hill, R., LeBlanc, K.: Measuring Human Performance in Simulated Nuclear Power Plant Control Rooms Using Eye Tracking, INL/EXT-15- 37311. Revision 0 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg, J.H., Kotval, X.P.: Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 24(6), 631–645 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parasuraman, R., Rizzo, M. (eds.): Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., Nakano, L.: Measuring visual clutter. J. Vis. 7(2), 17 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Braseth, A.O., Nurmilaukas, V., Laarni, J.: Realizing the information rich design for the loviisa nuclear power plant. In: American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (NPIC&HMIT), vol. 6, May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lew, R., Ulrich, T.A., Boring, R.L.: Nuclear reactor crew evaluation of a computerized operator support system HMI for chemical and volume control system. In: International Conference on Augmented Cognition, pp. 501–513 (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Moffitt, K.: Evaluation of the fixation duration in visual search. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 27(4), 370–372 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Irwin, D.E., Zelinsky, G.J.: Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 64(6), 882–895 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Unema, P.J., Pannasch, S., Joos, M., Velichkovsky, B.M.: Time course of information processing during scene perception: the relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration. Vis. Cogn. 12(3), 473–494 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2015). https://www.R-project.org/

  20. Pau, G., Fuchs, F., Sklyar, O., Boutros, M., Huber, W.: EBImage - an R package for image processing with applications to cellular phenotypes. Bioinformatics 26(7), 979–981 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barthelme, S.: imager: Image Processing Library Based on ‘CImg’. R package version 0.40.2 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gama, J.: colorscience: Color Science Methods and Data. R package version 1.0.4

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ooms, J.: tesseract: Open Source OCR Engine for R. R package version 1.6 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barr, D.J.: Analyzing ‘visual world’ eye tracking data using multilevel logistic regression. J. Mem. Lang. 59(4), 457–474 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nuthmann, A.: Fixation durations in scene viewing: modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24(2), 370–392 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., R Core Team: nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-131 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nakagawa, S., Schielzeth, H.: A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4(2), 133–142 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hugo, J., Gertman, D.: A qualitative method to estimate HSI display complexity. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 45(2), 141–150 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

INL is a multi-program laboratory operated by Battelle Energy Alliance LLC, for the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517. This work of authorship was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights. The United States Government retains, and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. The INL issued document number for this paper is: INL/CON-17-43991.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Casey Kovesdi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature (outside the USA)

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kovesdi, C., Le Blanc, K., Spielman, Z., Hill, R., Oxstrand, J. (2019). Quantifying the Contribution of Individual Display Features on Fixation Duration to Support Human-System Interface Design in Nuclear Power Plants. In: Ahram, T. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 787. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94229-2_44

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics