Advertisement

Advancing Environmental Health Literacy Through Community-Engaged Research and Popular Education

  • Catalina Garzón-GalvisEmail author
  • Michelle Wong
  • Daniel Madrigal
  • Luis Olmedo
  • Melissa Brown
  • Paul English
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the process of increasing and sustaining environmental health literacy (EHL) within communities impacted by environmental hazards and associated health conditions through the comprehensive engagement of community members in environmental health research and education projects. The chapter discusses the use of popular education approaches to facilitate more effective collaboration and optimize mutual co-learning among community members and their project partners. It also explores how, by using this approach, community members can contribute their own knowledge and awareness of environmental and health conditions to advance the research and education process, thereby increasing the EHL of their academically-credentialed partners.

Examples from several community-engaged research and education projects are shared to illustrate the versatility of these approaches as a means of raising EHL in a variety of contexts, including researcher-initiated scientific studies, community-initiated trainings, and co-initiated research projects. The case studies demonstrate how popular education and community-engaged research approaches can contribute to building and sustaining more equitable partnerships between impacted communities and their partners (who may be based in varied institutional settings such as academia, government agencies, and nonprofit organizations), with an emphasis on mutual co-learning and knowledge co-creation among community and academically-credentialed partners as key drivers of increased EHL.

Keywords

Community-based participatory research Community-engaged research Community engagement Community participation Knowledge co-creation Mutual co-learning Popular education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our colleagues from project partner organizations involved in the case studies highlighted in this chapter for reviewing and contributing their ideas to help shape earlier drafts: Kimberly Harley, Katherine Kogut, and James Nolan of the UC Berkeley Center for Environmental Research and Children’s Health (CERCH); and Adenike Adeyeye, Brian Beveridge, Paul Cummings, Joel Ervice, Frank Gallo, Ms. Margaret Gordon, Michael Kent, Anna Lee, and Jill Ratner of the Ditching Dirty Diesel Collaborative (DDD). We’d also like to thank the Community Steering Committee and the entire project team of the Imperial Air Project at CEHTP, CCV, UW, UCLA, and GWU. Liam O’Fallon and Symma Finn at National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences and Rick Kreutzer at California Department of Public Health provided insightful comments on previous chapter drafts. Lastly, we extend our heartfelt appreciation to all the community members and project participants who shared the experiences, knowledge, and leadership that made the content of this chapter possible, though the views expressed in this chapter and any errors are of course our own.

References

  1. (ARB), California Air Resources Board. (1998). Proposed identification of diesel exhaust as a toxic air contaminant - initial statement of reasons. Sacramento: California Environmental Protection Agency Retrieved from https://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/dieseltac/staffrpt.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. (ARB), California Air Resources Board. (2005). ARB begins enforcement of its new idling rule. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency Retrieved from https://www.arb.ca.gov/newsrel/nr013105.htm.Google Scholar
  3. (ARB), California Air Resources Board. (2006). Quantification of the health impacts and economic valuation of air pollution from ports and goods movement in California. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency Retrieved from https://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/gmerp/plan/appendix_a.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. (ARB), California Air Resources Board. (2012). Air quality trend summaries. Retrieved from http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/trends/trends1.phpGoogle Scholar
  5. (CACWNY), Clean Air Coalition of Western New York. (2012). Gearing up for action training. Retrieved from https://www.cacwny.org/2012/12/gearing-up-for-action-training/Google Scholar
  6. (CBE), Communities for a Better Environment. (2010a). East Oakland diesel truck survey report. Retrieved from Oakland, CA.: http://www.cbecal.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Diesel-truck-study-FINAL-092710.pdf
  7. (CBE), Communities for a Better Environment. (2010b). East Oakland particulate matter 2.5 community air monitoring research report. Retrieved from Oakland, CA: http://www.cbecal.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/East-Oakland-PM-Monitoring-Report-FINAL-2010.pdfGoogle Scholar
  8. (CEHTP), California Environmental Health Tracking Program. (2017). California environmental health tracking program. Retrieved from http://www.cehtp.orgGoogle Scholar
  9. (DDD), Ditching Dirty Diesel Collaborative. (2014). Anti-idling toolkit for schools. Oakland: DDD.Google Scholar
  10. (DDD), Ditching Dirty Diesel Collaborative. (2016). Making a good move for health: A health impact assessment of selected strategies in the Alameda County goods movement plan. Retrieved from Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
  11. (DDD), Ditching Dirty Diesel Collaborative. (2017). A history of success – Anti-idling. Retrieved from http://www.ditchingdirtydiesel.org/about/success-anti-idlingGoogle Scholar
  12. (DDD), Ditching Dirty Diesel Collaborative, & (PI), Pacific Institute. (2006). Paying with our health: The real cost of freight transport in California. Retrieved from Oakland, CAGoogle Scholar
  13. (DDD), Ditching Dirty Diesel Collaborative, & (PI), Pacific Institute. (2010). Gearing up for action: A curriculum guide for freight transport justice. Retrieved from Oakland, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. (DDD), Ditching Dirty Diesel Collaborative, & (PI), Pacific Institute. (2011). At a crossroads in our region’s health: Freight transport and the future of community health in the San Francisco Bay Area. Retrieved from OaklandGoogle Scholar
  15. (EBASE), East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy, & (PI), Pacific Institute. (2009). Taking a toll: The high cost of health, environment, and worker impacts of the Oakland port trucking system (1893790193). Retrieved from Oakland, CA: http://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/taking_a_toll3.pdf
  16. (WOEIP), West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project, & (PI), Pacific Institute. (2003). Clearing the air: Reducing diesel pollution in West Oakland. Retrieved from Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Abma, T. A., Cook, T., Rämgård, M., Kleba, E., Harris, J., & Wallerstein, N. (2017). Social impact of participatory health research: Collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization. Educational Action Research, 25(4), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Anderson, J. O., Thundiyil, J. G., & Stolbach, A. (2012). Clearing the air: A review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health. Journal of Medical Toxicology, 8(2), 166–175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-011-0203-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Balazs, C. L., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2013). The three R’s: How community based participatory research strengthens the rigor, relevance and reach of science. Environmental Justice, 6(1), 9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2012.0017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Banks, S., Armstrong, A., Carter, K., Graham, H., Hayward, P., Henry, A., et al. (2013). Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science, 8(3), 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brown, P. (1995). Race, class, and environmental health: A review and systematization of the literature. Environmental Research, 69(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brown, P., Mayer, B., Zavestoski, S., Luebke, T., Mandelbaum, J., McCormick, S., & Lyson, M. (2011). The health politics of asthma: environmental justice and collective illness experience. In Contested illnesses: Citizens, science, and health social movements. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals, updated tables, February 2015. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from Atlanta, GA: https://www.cdc.gov/biomonitoring/pdf/FourthReport_UpdatedTables_Feb2015.pdf.
  25. Chavez, V., Duran, B., Baker, Q. E., Avila, M. M., & Wallerstein, N. (2008). The dance of race and privilege in CBPR. Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (pp. 91–105).Google Scholar
  26. Cole, L. W., & Foster, S. R. (2001). From the ground up: Environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  27. De Leña, A. (2013). What’s Freight Got To Do With It? Retrieved from Oakland, CA: http://pacinst.org/whats-freight-got-to-do-with-it/Google Scholar
  28. Di, Qian, Wang, Yan, Zanobetti, A., Wang, Yun, Koutrakis, P., Choirat, C.,. .. Schwartz, J. D. (2017). Air pollution and mortality in the Medicare population. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(26), 2513–2522.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. English, P. B., Olmedo, L., Bejarano, E., Lugo, H., Murillo, E., Seto, E., et al. (2017). The Imperial County community air monitoring network: A model for community-based environmental monitoring for public health action. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(7), 074501.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eskenazi, B., Bradman, A., Gladstone, E. A., Jaramillo, S., Birch, K., & Holland, N. (2003). CHAMACOS, a longitudinal birth cohort study: Lessons from the fields. Journal of Children’s Health, 1(1), 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Finn, S., & O’Fallon, L. (2017). The emergence of environmental health literacy—From its roots to its future potential. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125(4), 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed, (pp. 65–80, Myra Bergman Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  33. Garzón, C. (2010). Training the trainers on using popular education to demystify freight transport. Retrieved from Oakland, CA: http://pacinst.org/media-center/online-updates/november-2010-online-update/
  34. Garzón, C. (2014). Community workshop on taking action to improve indoor and outdoor air quality. Retrieved from http://pacinst.org/about-us/programs/community-strategies-for-sustainability-and-justice/cssj-program-monthly-updates/Google Scholar
  35. Garzón, C., Dominie, W., & Gordon, M. (2014). Pollution-free housing for all: Coalition-based research, education, and advocacy for healthier housing in transportation and land use planning in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environmental Justice, 7(6), 186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gonzalez, R. (2014). Popular education practices for community organizing. Retrieved from http://www.facilitatingpower.com/popular_education_for_community_organizingGoogle Scholar
  37. Gonzalez, P. A., Minkler, M., Garcia, A. P., Gordon, M., Garzon, C., Palaniappan, M., et al. (2011). Community-based participatory research and policy advocacy to reduce diesel exposure in West Oakland, California. American Journal of Public Health, 101(Suppl 1), S166–S175.  https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2010.196204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harley, K. G., Kogut, K., Madrigal, D. S., Cardenas, M., Vera, I. A., Meza-Alfaro, G., et al. (2016). Reducing phthalate, paraben, and phenol exposure from personal care products in adolescent girls: Findings from the HERMOSA intervention study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(10), 1600–1607.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hergenrather, K. C., Rhodes, S. D., Cowan, C. A., Bardhoshi, G., & Pula, S. (2009). Photovoice as community-based participatory research: A qualitative review. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33(6), 686–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., Becker, A. B., Allen, A., GUZ-MAN, J. R., et al. (2008). Critical issues in developing and following CBPR principles (pp. 47–66).Google Scholar
  41. Liebman, A. K., Juarez, P. M., Leyva, C., & Corona, A. (2007). A pilot program using promotoras de salud to educate farmworker families about the risk from pesticide exposure. Journal of Agromedicine, 12(2), 33–43.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J096v12n02_04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Madrigal, D., Salvatore, A., Casillas, G., Casillas, C., Vera, I., Eskenazi, B., & Minkler, M. (2014). Health in my community: Conducting and evaluating PhotoVoice as a tool to promote environmental health and leadership among Latino/a youth. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 8(3), 317–329.  https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2014.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Madrigal, D. S., Minkler, M., Parra, K. L., Mundo, C., Gonzalez, J. E., Jimenez, R., et al. (2016). Improving Latino Youths’ environmental health literacy and leadership skills through participatory research on chemical exposures in cosmetics: The HERMOSA study. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 36(4), 231–240.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684x16657734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(6), 684–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Minkler, M., Wallace, S. P., & McDonald, M. (1994). The political economy of health: A useful theoretical tool for health education practice. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 15(2), 111–126.  https://doi.org/10.2190/t1y0-8aru-rl96-lpdu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Minkler, M., Garcia, A. P., Williams, J., LoPresti, T., & Lilly, J. (2010). Si se puede: Using participatory research to promote environmental justice in a Latino community in San Diego, California. Journal of Urban Health, 87(5), 796–812.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9490-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Muhammad, M., Garzón, C., Perez, A., & West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project (2017). Understanding contemporary racism, power and privilege and their impacts on CBPR. In Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: Advancing Social and Health Equity (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Neighborhood House of North Richmond (NHNR) and Pacific Institute (PI). (2005). Deluged by Diesel: Healthy Solutions for West County. Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
  49. Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nutbeam, D. (2008). The evolving concept of health literacy. Social Science & Medicine, 67(12), 2072–2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Fallon, L. R., & Dearry, A. (2001). Commitment of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to community-based participatory research for rural health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(Suppl 3), 469–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paradies, Y., Ben, J., Denson, N., Elias, A., Priest, N., Pieterse, A.,. .. Gee, G. (2015). Racism as a determinant of health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 10(9), e0138511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sadd, J., Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., Matsuoka, M., Prichard, M., & Carter, V. (2014). The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the ground-truth: Methods to advance environmental justice and researcher–community partnerships. Health Education & Behavior, 41(3), 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, H. (2011). Building a research and outreach partnership to improve Latino community health in Charlotte-Mecklenburg: Geographers, doctors, and community members. Charlotte: UNC Charlotte Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  55. Sullivan, J., & Lloyd, R. S. (2006). The forum theatre of Augusto Boal: A dramatic model for dialogue and community-based environmental science. Local Environment, 11(6), 627–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. United States Census Bureau. (2010). US Census Bureau Quick Facts: Imperial County. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/06025,0636294,00
  57. Vaduganathan, M., De Palma, G., Manerba, A., Goldoni, M., Triggiani, M., Apostoli, P., et al. (2016). Risk of cardiovascular hospitalizations from exposure to coarse particulate matter (PM10) below the European Union safety threshold. American Journal of Cardiology, 117(8), 1231–1235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wallerstein, N., & Bernstein, E. (1988). Empowerment education: Freire’s ideas adapted to health education. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2008). The theoretical, historical, and practice roots of CBPR. Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes, 2nd ed., 25–46.Google Scholar
  60. Wiggins, N. (2011). Popular education for health promotion and community empowerment: A review of the literature. Health Promotion International, 27(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dar046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. World Health Organization (WHO). (2014). Burden of disease from ambient air pollution for 2012. World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  62. Wright, K. N., Williams, P., Wright, S., Lieber, E., Carrasco, S. R., & Gedjeyan, H. (2011). Ties that bind: Creating and sustaining community-academic partnerships. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 4, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catalina Garzón-Galvis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michelle Wong
    • 1
  • Daniel Madrigal
    • 1
  • Luis Olmedo
    • 2
  • Melissa Brown
    • 3
  • Paul English
    • 1
  1. 1.California Environmental Health Tracking ProgramRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Comite Civico del ValleBrawleyUSA
  3. 3.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations