Skip to main content

Pilot Homicide-Suicide: A System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) of Germanwings GWI18G

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 786))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2695 Accesses

Abstract

Pilot homicide-suicides occur very rarely in commercial aviation. Nonetheless, when a crash like Germanwings flight 4U9525 has occurred, the stakeholders take action to improve current standards to help prevent new cases. The EASA-led task-force has proposed several recommendations. The System Theoretic Accident Process Analysis (STPA) of the accident investigates how European countermeasures have been improved the system at different levels. The new minimum cockpit occupancy of two personnel was tied to a safety and risk assessment by the operator whereas the cockpit door design was not changed. On a higher level a psychological health assessment for initial medicals class 1 has been added. Pilot support programs, an improvement of aeromedical services and a random drugs/alcohol screening complement the actions is being undertaken. Conflicts with privacy laws and medical confidentiality could not be solved entirely and are still being debated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wu, A.C., Donnelly-McLay, D., Weisskopf, M.G., McNeely, E., Betancourt, T.S., Allen, J.G.: Airplane pilot mental health and suicidal thoughts: a cross-sectional descriptive study via anonymous web-based survey. Environ. Health 15, 121 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. International Civil Aviation Organization: Manual of Civil Aviation Medicine. Doc. International Civil Aviation Organization, Montréal, Canada (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kenedi, C., Friedman, S.H., Watson, D., Preitner, C.: Suicide and murder-suicide involving aircraft. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 87, 388–396 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. http://news.aviation-safety.net/2015/03/26/list-of-aircraft-accidents-and-incidents-deliberately-caused-by-pilots/

  5. Aerial Accident Investigation Committee: Japan Airlines Corporation belongs to Douglas DC–61 Type JA 8061 Tokyo International Airport (Haneda) Offshore Navigation May 16, 1982. Ministry of Transport (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saleva, O., Putkonen, H., Kiviruusu, O., Lönnqvist, J.: Homicide–suicide—an event hard to prevent and separate from homicide or suicide. Forensic Sci. Int. 166, 204–208 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Panczak, R., Geissbühler, M., Zwahlen, M., Killias, M., Tal, K., Egger, M.: Homicide-suicides compared to homicides and suicides: systematic review and meta-analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 233, 28–36 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. International Civil Aviation Organization: Annex 11 – Air Traffic Services. International Organization of Civil Aviation, Montreal (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Evans, A.D.B.: Aeromedical risk: a numerical approach. In: Gradwell, D.P., Rainford, D.J. (eds.) Ernsting’s Aviation and Space Medicine, pp. 373–384. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell, S.J., Evans, A.D.B.: Flight safety and medical incapacitation risk of airline pilots. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 75, 260–268 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. European Aviation Safety Agency: Acceptable Means of Compliance and Guidance Material to Part-MED. European Aviation Safety Agency, Cologne (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Airbus: A318/A319/A320/A321 Flight Crew Operating Manual. Airbus S.A.S., Blagnac Cedex, France (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leveson, N.G.: A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42, 237–270 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leveson, N.G.: Engineering A Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Allison, C.K., Revell, K.M., Sears, R., Stanton, N.A.: Systems theoretic accident model and process (STAMP) safety modelling applied to an aircraft rapid decompression event. Saf. Sci. 98, 159–166 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Plioutsias, A., Karanikas, N.: Using STPA in the evaluation of fighter pilots training programs. Procedia Eng. 128, 25–34 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fleming, C.H., Leveson, N.G.: Improving hazard analysis and certification of integrated modular avionics. J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst. 11, 397–411 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chatzimichailidou, M.M., Karanikas, N., Plioutsias, A.: Application of STPA on small drone operations: a benchmarking approach. Procedia Eng. 179, 13–22 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu, Y., Zhang, S.-G., Tang, P., Gong, L.: STAMP-based safety control approach for flight testing of a low-cost unmanned subscale blended-wing-body demonstrator. Saf. Sci. 74, 102–113 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishimatsu, T., Leveson, N.G., Thomas, J.P., Fleming, C.H., Katahira, M., Miyamoto, Y., Ujiie, R., Nakao, H., Hoshino, N.: Hazard analysis of complex spacecraft using systems-theoretic process analysis. J. Spacecraft Rockets 51, 509–522 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leveson, N.G.: Technical and managerial factors in the NASA challenger and columbia losses: looking forward to the future. In: Kleinman, D.L., Cloud-Hansen, K.A., Matta, C., Handelsman, J. (eds.) Controversies in Science and Technology, From Climate to Chromosomes, vol. 2, pp. 237–261. Mary Ann Liebert, New Rochelle (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abdulkhaleq, A., Lammering, D., Wagner, S., Röder, J., Balbierer, N., Ramsauer, L., Raste, T., Boehmert, H.: A systematic approach based on STPA for developing a dependable architecture for fully automated driving vehicles. Procedia Eng. 179, 41–51 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Siegel, A.W., Schraagen, J.M.C.: Beyond procedures: team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience. Saf. Sci. 91, 181–191 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rasmussen, J.: Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27, 183–213 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rasmussen, J.: The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decisionmaking and system management. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 15, 234–243 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leveson, N.G.: Rasmussen’s legacy: a paradigm change in engineering for safety. Appl. Ergon. 59, 581–591 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Čepin, M.: Event tree analysis. In: Čepin, M. (ed.) Assessment of Power System Reliability, pp. 89–99. Springer-Verlag, London (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-688-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, W.S., Grosh, D.L., Tillman, F.A., Lie, C.H.: Fault tree analysis, methods, and applications: a review. IEEE Trans. Reliabil. R-34, 194–203 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Geymar, J.A.B., Ebecken, N.F.F.: Fault-tree analysis: a knowledge-engineering approach. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 40, 37–45 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jordi, D.A., Fthenakis, V., Vílcheza, J.A., Arnaldosa, J.: Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review. J. Hazard. Mater. 53, 19–32 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la sécurité de l’aviation civile: Final Report: Accident on 24 March 2015 at Prads-Haute-Bléone (Alpes-de-Haute-Provence, France) to the Airbus A320-211 registered D-AIPX operated by Germanwings (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wiewiórowski, W.R.: EASA notification for prior checking “European Aero-Medical Repository” (EAMR) project. In: European Aviation Safety, A. (ed.), Bruessels, Belgium (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Agency, E.A.S.: Action Plan for the Implementation of the Germanwings Task Force Recommendations. European Aviation Safety Agency, Cologne (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. European Aviation Safety Agency: Task Force on Measures Following the Accident of Germanwings Flight 9525: Final Report. European Aviation Safety Agency, Cologne, Germany (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. European Aviation Safety Agency: Minimum Cockpit Occupancy. Safety Information Bulletin. European Aviation Safety Agency, Cologne, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. European Aviation Safety Agency: Aircrew medical fitness: Implementation of the recommendations made by the EASA-led Germanwings Task Force on the accident of the Germanwings Flight 9525. Opinion No. 14/2016, vol. 14/2016. European Aviation Safety Agency, Cologne, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. European Aviation Safety Agency: Update of Part-MED (Annex IV to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011). Opinion No. 09/2016. European Aviation Safety Agency, Cologne, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. European Aviation Safety Agency: Authorised persons in the flight crew compartment. In: Safety Information Bulletin. European Aviation Safety Agency, Cologne (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. European Aviation Safety Agency: 2-persons in the cockpit SIB recommendation No. 2015-04: Summary of survey results on “Assessment of effectiveness of 2-persons-in-the-cockpit recommendation included in EASA SIB 2015–04”. Cologne, Germany (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Low, H.: Germanwings Crash: Have Cockpit Doors Changed?. BBC News Magazine, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Movsesian, S.: Enhanced Security Flight Deck Doors – Commercial Airplanes. SAE Technical Paper, vol. 2002-01-2998 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Guo, Y., Ji, M., You, X., Huang, J.: Protective effects of emotional intelligence and proactive coping on civil pilots. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 88, 858–865 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li, G., Baker, S.P., Qiang, Y., Rebok, G.W., McCarthy, M.L.: Alcohol violations and aviation accidents: findings from the U.S. mandatory alcohol testing program. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 78, 510–513 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Federal Aviation Administration. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/avs/offices/aam/drug_alcohol/

  45. Clark, J.M.: Assuring safer skies?: a survey of aeromedical issues post-germanwings. J. Air Law Commer. 81, 351–376 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Oehler, T.: Die ärztliche Schweigepflicht–neue Grenzen nach dem Germanwings-Absturz. Flugmedizin Tropenmedizin Reisemedizin 24, 118–121 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cockpit, V.: Positionspapier der Vereinigung Cockpit zur Veröffentlichung der EASA “Taskforce on Measures Follwing the Accident of Germanwings Flight 9525”. Vereinigung Cockpit, Frankfurt am Main (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Schmid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schmid, D. (2019). Pilot Homicide-Suicide: A System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) of Germanwings GWI18G. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 786. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93884-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93885-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics