Abstract
In this paper, the user requirements for future autonomous mobility services, i.e. autonomous ridesharing and the potential influence of gender are investigated following a two-tiered procedure. Subsequently to interviews, a questionnaire study including 893 participants was conducted, in which attitudes and requirements were evaluated. It turned out that users are generally open to the new mobility service. Factors of the journey itself, such as the determination of routes and co-passengers were perceived as important, whereas the vehicle equipment and the entertainment facilities were rather unimportant. In general, almost no willingness to pay surcharges for an additional individualization of the service was determined. While men and women differ in terms of readiness to use and evaluation of the service, no differences were found in the requirements for booking options and the willingness to pay.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Steg, L.: Can public transport compete with the private car? IATSS Res. 27(2), 27–35 (2003)
European Commission: Annual Accident Report 2017. European Road Safety Observatory. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/statistics/dacota/asr2017.pdf. Accessed 01 Mar 2018
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Joint science academies’ Statement: Global response to climate change. http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdf. Accessed 01 Mar 2018
Umweltbundesamt: Treibhausgas-Emissionen in Deutschland. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/klima/treibhausgas-emissionen-in-deutschland. Accessed 01 Mar 2018
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA): National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/811059. Accessed 01 Mar 2018
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA): National Automated Vehicles for Safety. https://www.nhtsa.gov/technology-innovation/automated-vehicles-safety#issue-road-self-driving. Accessed 01 Mar 2018
Bansal, P., Kockelman, K., Singh, A.: Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: an austin perspective. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 67, 1–14 (2016)
Stocker, A., Shaheen, S.: Shared automated mobility: early exploration and potential impacts. In: Road Vehicle Automation 4, pp. 125–139. Springer, Cham (2017)
Wielinski, G., Trépanier, M., Morency, C.: Electric and hybrid car use in a free-floating carsharing system. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 11, 161–169 (2016)
Chen, Y., Young, S., Qi, X., Gonder, J.: Estimate of fuel consumption and GHG emission impact from an automated mobility district. In: 2015 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), pp. 271–278. IEEE (2015)
Howard, D., Dai, D.: Public perceptions of self-driving cars: the case of Berkeley, California. In: 93rd Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers. TRB, Washington (2014)
Schmidt, T., Philipsen, R., Ziefle, M.: Safety First? - V2X – perceived benefits, barriers and trade-offs of automated driving. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems (VEHITS), pp. 39–46. SciTePress, Setúbal (2015)
Richardson, N., Doubek, F., Kuhn, K., Stumpf, A.: Assessing truck drivers’ and fleet managers’ opinions towards highly automated driving. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pp. 473–484. Springer, Cham (2016)
Rödel, C., Stadler, S., Meschtscherjakov, A., Tscheligi, M.: Towards autonomous cars. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI 2014, pp. 1–8. ACM, New York (2014)
Böhm, P., Kocur, M., Firat, M., Isemann, D.: Which factors influence attitudes towards using autonomous vehicles? In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct - AutomotiveUI 2017, pp. 141–145. ACM, New York (2017)
dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., Cecin, P.: The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transp. Policy 18, 217–227 (2011)
Beirão, G., Sarsfield Cabral, J.: Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp. Policy 14, 478–489 (2007)
Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., Hartig, T.: Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: a research review. Transp. Policy 25, 119–127 (2013)
Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: Motorists’ preferences for different levels of vehicle automation (2016). http://umich.edu/~umtriswt/PDF/SWT-2016-8.pdf. Accessed 01 Mar 2018
Hohenberger, C., Spörrle, M., Welpe, I.: How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 94, 374–385 (2016)
Neyer, F., Felber, J., Gebhardt, C.: Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft (technology commitment). Diagnostica 58, 87–99 (2012)
Wagenmakers, E., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J., Morey, R.: Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 35–57 (2017)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all participants for sharing opinions on a novel technology. Furthermore, thanks go to Susanne Gohr, Jennifer Kirstgen and Kevin Wegener for their research assistance, as well as to Philip Glass for inspiring the paper title.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Philipsen, R., Brell, T., Ziefle, M. (2019). Carriage Without a Driver – User Requirements for Intelligent Autonomous Mobility Services. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 786. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93884-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93885-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)